Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sea Life Flourishes in the Gulf
National Review Online ^ | November 15, 2010 | Lou Dolinar

Posted on 11/15/2010 7:00:40 AM PST by kingattax

The Great Oil Spill Panic of 2010 will go down in history as mass hysteria on par with the Dutch tulip bubble.

The catastrophists were wrong (again) about the Deep Water Horizon oil spill. There have been no major fish die-offs. On the contrary, a comprehensive new study says that in some of the most heavily fished areas of the Gulf of Mexico, various forms of sea life, from shrimp to sharks, have seen their populations triple since before the spill. Some species, including shrimp and croaker, did even better.

And meanwhile, the media has greatly exaggerated damage found in studies about coral, which is in some ways more vulnerable to oil and dispersant. Most of it is doing fine.

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: deepwaterhorizon; oilspill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

1 posted on 11/15/2010 7:00:43 AM PST by kingattax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kingattax
If you take the viewpoint that MSM is a propaganda machine and completely full of BS you will be OK.
2 posted on 11/15/2010 7:06:35 AM PST by mongo141
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

I urge everyone who thinks Obama and his administration did a “bang up” job on the oil spill to read the following:

http://www.floridaoilspilllaw.com/

They have been documenting, chapter and verse, the fallout.

And it ain’t pretty, folks.


3 posted on 11/15/2010 7:07:18 AM PST by Daisyjane69 (Michael Reagan: "Welcome back, Dad, even if you're wearing a dress and bearing children this time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Who says the fish ecosystem doesn’t like oil? They are claiming lowered fishing but how do they not know it wasn’t the oil that spurred the growth of the fish populations which would mean oil drilling/spilling helps the environment.

Pray for America


4 posted on 11/15/2010 7:11:11 AM PST by bray (A November to Remember)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

How ironic, the same thing happened after the Exxon Valdez spill was cleaned up.


5 posted on 11/15/2010 7:11:12 AM PST by mazda77 (Mike Hogan - JAX Mayor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
On the contrary, a comprehensive new study says that in some of the most heavily fished areas of the Gulf of Mexico, various forms of sea life, from shrimp to sharks, have seen their populations triple since before the spill.

Could that be because there was no fishing going on for 10 months??

There may be more fish but that does not mean they are safe to eat.

I don't trust the gov't saying these fish are now safe to eat...I would like to see a true independent review and testing.

6 posted on 11/15/2010 7:12:22 AM PST by hoyt-clagwell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daisyjane69

It doesn’t matter if Obama did a “bang up job”. The MSM is going to give him a pass on it. It will never be used against him.

Obama will be gone in two years, but the greenies and their anti-petroleum propaganda machine will still be going strong unless we take a rational look at oil production risk and rewards.


7 posted on 11/15/2010 7:18:02 AM PST by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hoyt-clagwell
Could that be because there was no fishing going on for 10 months??

Bacteria eat the oil, other critters eat the bacteria, and on up the food chain...More food for the bacteria translates to more food all the way up.

I would like to see a true independent review and testing.

Me, too. I work in the oil industry, and I don't trust the government, either.

8 posted on 11/15/2010 7:19:03 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
Very early on, a renowned scientist specializing in sea life etc etc said "watch...mother nature will have a big hand in this cleanup and the longterm damage will be zilch.

I believe that this disaster could have been nipped much earlier except for government interference.

The entire coal, oil and gas industies have been blackmailed by Obama and friends.

9 posted on 11/15/2010 7:19:14 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
Back in the 70’s one of the well publicized environmental groups (name unrecalled) published a widespread attack on a manufacturing company in the Caribbean saying the runoff from the company site was killing a a large off shore coral reef. The company hired a European marine research company who brought their research vessel to the island for several years. Their final report in essence said the environmental group lied, that in fact the bit of runoff that did occur was causing the reef to grow and flourish.

Another company at a different location was attacked by the same environmental group, rolled over and spent millions to capture and ship away runoff, hired an environmental staff and their reef ten years later was pronounced dead. Reliable story? The first story I learned of first hand from a company engineer who was there, the second I read about.

10 posted on 11/15/2010 7:20:35 AM PST by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mazda77

The Exxon spill is/was very different....Water temperature had/has a lot to do with recovery.


11 posted on 11/15/2010 7:21:49 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: hoyt-clagwell
Could that be because there was no fishing going on for 10 months??

Could that be because microbes specially adapted to eat naturally occurring oil from seeps have been having the feast of their lives?

Could it be that fish feed on these microbes?

Could it be that oil is an excellent (albeit expensive and messy) fertilizer?

Could it be that Bonehead Gore and the rest of the enviro-wacko lobby were wrong about an oil spill ruining the Gulf's ecology forever?

12 posted on 11/15/2010 7:22:33 AM PST by Zakeet (Like the wise Wee Wee said, "We can't be broke ... we still have checks in the checkbook.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Lou Dolinar discredits the National Review Online.

The failure to report the actual findings of the USF marine biology department accurately and fully is a lie by omission so large you can sail a leaking supertanker through it.

For reality based reporting, try http://www.floridaoilspilllaw.com/


13 posted on 11/15/2010 7:28:58 AM PST by JerseyHighlander (p.s. The word 'bloggers' is not in the freerepublic spellcheck dictionary?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Please let me state this, for those who are not scientifically inclined:

Oil is a nature killer.

Take me up on this challenge. Go to your nearest garden center/hardware store, etc. Examine the ingredient label of the “bug killers.” You’ll note that nearly every one of them contains an oil product as one of the first ingredients.

Why? Because it denies the birth of a next generation of critters.

Oil coats eggs. The eggs of sea creatures as well as land creatures. Science teaches us that eggs need to “breathe” in order to be fresh; oil prevents this. Btw, if you have any old cookbooks...people USED TO ask if coating chicken eggs (like we have in cartons) with wax or oil would make them last longer. It doesn’t, and that is why we cannot buy eggs treated this way. What, you don’t think the growers would do this if they thought it would make their product last longer????

In any event, oil seals eggs, rendering them dead. We are not going to feel the effects now; we will feel them in the next two or three years, when there is no longer any Gulf progeny. Unless some smart set of scientists did a Noah’s Ark type of rescue of adults and eggs, as this mess unfolded, this is going to ruin the Gulf seafood business, down the road.

If you’re a fan of Gulf seafood products, I suggest you buy up what you can now, and carefully process it to go in your freezer.

I have no dog in this fight, as I’m allergic to seafood. But I hate to know what is going to befall our mom & pop seafood businesses in the Gulf.


14 posted on 11/15/2010 7:30:19 AM PST by Daisyjane69 (Michael Reagan: "Welcome back, Dad, even if you're wearing a dress and bearing children this time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
Why would anyone think there is no independent testing going on. Of course there is. No company wants to issue a recall. The government is never held libel so relying on government testing is ridiculous.

All those fisherman are experienced. You're a lot safer with their observations and tests than "good enough for government testers".

15 posted on 11/15/2010 7:32:03 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: hoyt-clagwell

Your post seems to ignore the naturally occurring phenomenon that has been going on forever. Oil and hydrocarbons have been a part of the gulf ecosystem before we ever considered fishing and consuming them. Nore damage is and has been done by increasing the flow of the Mississippi into the gulf and the introduction of phosphates than oil ever will have.

Quite interesting that you ascribe some level of real wisdom to the very scientific community that has become self serving and intrusuive, acting as if all that is now is man made and that nature has never before experienced it and we are evil. You have eaten gulf sea food products for generations that have adapted to this natural state and they never hurt you, so what has changed?

Their intent has, they think they can control us with their theories and suppositions. I say no to all of them and acknowledge the creator made the earth for us and these are all part of it, only the hysteria caused by their need to tell us how to live has changed.


16 posted on 11/15/2010 7:32:37 AM PST by 100American (Knowledge is knowing how, Wisdom is knowing when)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
Could that be because microbes specially adapted to eat naturally occurring oil from seeps have been having the feast of their lives? Could it be that fish feed on these microbes? Could it be that oil is an excellent (albeit expensive and messy) fertilizer?

Just because the microbes ate the oil does not mean the oil disappeared. Oil breaks down into it's basic forms such as benzine etc which is deadly to humans. The fish eventually ate the microbes.

If you think the fish/shrimp are now safe to eat without accurate unbiased testing I have some Chernobyl fish you would enjoy...you know..the kind that have 3 eyes.

Just because you cannot see it does not mean it's not there.

17 posted on 11/15/2010 7:32:47 AM PST by hoyt-clagwell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

lol sealife tripled since the spill.
Thats almost as funny as “democrats care about the people”


18 posted on 11/15/2010 7:35:05 AM PST by winodog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

You sound like an oil is evil denier!!

Go Ducks!


19 posted on 11/15/2010 7:39:31 AM PST by bray (A November to Remember)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 100American
Oil and hydrocarbons have been a part of the gulf ecosystem before we ever considered fishing and consuming them. Nore damage is and has been done by increasing the flow of the Mississippi into the gulf and the introduction of phosphates than oil ever will have

Please tell me you are not comparing natural seeping oil or natural proceses to what happened in the Gulf with an oil slick due to a blowout....

20 posted on 11/15/2010 7:39:56 AM PST by hoyt-clagwell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson