Betcha there will be a porn website devoted to airport screening photos.
Why the Church condemn any such behavior on moral grounds alone!
Best regards,
Oh, we can trust government employees. They would never have an interest in porn. SEC comes to mind.
Nemphos of Cockeysville? You;re kidding, right?
I really hope parents will sue the TSA. Child pornography, molestation. We have to start bringing the full force of public pressure on these effing nazi nuckfutzes now.
The problem is if you exempt children...the whole thing is pretty much useless because terrorists have been brainwashing kids forever. They’ll strap a bomb to a kid.
And yes...you better believe a terrorist is capable of doing such a thing. Absolutely.
And I still want to know, do they make sure only female scanners view female passengers, and male scanners view male?
Not likely, when they put both sexes through the same scanner.
Just a flask of rum, a jar of Vaseline, and a box of Kleenex. There is no-way they can tell me that letting perverts sign up to look at nude pictures of people all day (who else would sign up for such a job?) is better than ... oh... I don't know... HOW ABOUT PROFILING - CHECKING THE PEOPLE THAT REALLY NEED TO BE CHECKED! TSA, you're the laughingstock of the security business. I've talked to a couple of operators in the real security business. (TSA) You are kids playing with cap guns compared to these guys.
It's not the American way, some other method has to be employed. How about a quick interview, a few direct questions, and body language observations (eye movement, etc.) to trip a more thorough screening.
Also, any Muslim act to down a plane (successful or not) results in a missle strike on a Islamic Holy Site or predominantly Muslim city chosen at random. Second attempt, two missles. Repeat as necessary.
We may not be able to end every attack but will at least get their attention. Retaliate as one would if under attack (because we are).
They've got a lot of jihadis, we've got a lot of missles. Time to use them. Put the ball in their court, see how long they wish to play the game.
I can’t wait to DRIVE to my Sisters in Fort Smith for Christmas!
That the terrorists have taken an arguably "free" nation and propelled us to the hysterical point where there are those who argue we need to image nude childtren, or even submit (key word, there, submit) to groping, searches, etc. while they cow our government to not profile them is prima facie evidence we are losing the war.
It has nothing to do with military conquest, the chains which the American people are insisting on wearing are forged of their own fear.
Those who would sacrifice essential liberty for safety deserve neither (and won't have either).
Al Qaeda didn’t need to take away our freedoms, the US Gov’t is doing the job for them.
We know basically who the enemy is, what mosques they go to, and what countries they are from - yet it is normal Americans who are treated like criminals
As she should be. Isn't there a law against viewing child pornography?? How is this different??
Latest outrage
I don’t get it. If a terrorist wanted to hide a bomb that was undetectable, they would surgically implant one. All the body cavity searches would never find a bomb buried deep in the intestinal cavity.
All these body searches and massively expensive scanners are just more of the “do something about it” stuff to make the sheeple think they are being protected.
The terrorists are probably looking at easier targets than airplanes anyway.
Get this; Muslims are exempt from pat down,so I hear.Is that official??
This is madness.
“The officer viewing the image is in a locked room with no windows. The door to the locked room is not opened until the passenger has cleared the checkpoint and the images have been deleted. Should the two officers need to communicate, that is done with whisper headsets.”
. . .
Who is watching the watchers that ogle naked images of our families and exchange private whispers about what they see?