[steel_resolve]

All I ask is for an honest vetting, not a coronatiom. Do you agree? If so, then it is too early to corinate anyone. Just sayin.

[Windflier]

All I ask is for an honest vetting, not a coronatiom.

Again, you must have been playing hooky from current events (and FR) for the last two years.

NO potential contender for 2012 has been vetted more than Sarah Palin.

[excopconservative]

If so, then it is too early to corinate anyone. Just sayin.

---

There’s no coronation. We will have caucuses and primaries. We have our ears open and are listening. At this point, only one candidate is saying what we want to hear. We don’t want to hear whispering, rumors, and anonymous staffers. If there is to be more than one candidate, then let him or her step forward and say something that advances the discussion.

[SuziQ]

All I ask is for an honest vetting, not a coronatiom.

How much more 'vetting' of Sarah Palin do you need? I have no problem with legitimate questions being raised, and some of that has been done, but most of the MSM has engaged in character assassination, and silly stories like this snarky article.

[rabidralph]

I’m not coronating anyone. Besides, we do not have monarchs in this country. The American people still decide the outcome. Who are you supporting at this early outset?