Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TSA Ejects Oceanside Man from Airport for Refusing Security Check (No Touchy My Genitals)
Sign On San Diego ^ | 11/14/2010 | Sign On San Diego

Posted on 11/14/2010 5:27:33 PM PST by Dallas59

SAN DIEGO — John Tyner won't be pheasant hunting in South Dakota with his father-in-law any time soon.

Tyner was simultaneously thrown out of San Diego International Airport on Saturday morning for refusing to submit to a security check and threatened with a civil suit and $10,000 fine if he left.

And he got the whole thing on his cell phone. Well, the audio at least.

The 31-year-old Oceanside software programmer was supposed to leave from Lindbergh Field on Saturday morning and until a TSA agent directed him toward one of the recently installed full-body scanners, Tyner seemed to be on his way.

(Excerpt) Read more at signonsandiego.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: airport; assault; crime; tsa; tsapervs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-295 next last
To: freedumb2003

“The have the right to regulate almost any private enterprise.”

THE HELL they do!
We have the right to terminate their employment.
Line up a half a million people in front of the capital
screaming ENOUGH and see how long this continues.

GROW a pair and stop licking theirs.


241 posted on 11/14/2010 8:12:01 PM PST by DaveTesla (You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: sjmjax

Your mandatory health insurance policy...


I will not deal well with the government ordering what is done to my body in the doctor’s office.

If it’s not the TSA feeling up your croch, it is HHS peeping at us through our private medical records and imposing themselves on us in the doctors visit.

I guess I am a bad new socialist person.


242 posted on 11/14/2010 8:12:09 PM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: patriot preacher

>>It’s called the Fourth Amendment — start ASSERTING it. <<

Not applicable against the regulatory agency overseeing a private enterprise.

The only RIGHTS issue here is to have everyone treated the same. If muslim women get a pass below the neck, so do you and I.


243 posted on 11/14/2010 8:13:14 PM PST by freedumb2003 (IMHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

Where are the health physics studies on the back-scatter x-rays and the terahertz today? They are, I suspect, the same place we were during the Manhattan Project, that is just guesses with few real data points. But unlike the Manhattan Project where very few were subjected to these novel forms of radiation, we are here exposing the whole damn country.

That’s dangerous.


244 posted on 11/14/2010 8:13:47 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
TSA checkpoints: Real-life horrors

WND Exclusive LIFE WITH BIG BROTHER
TSA checkpoints: Real-life horrors
'Security is one thing, license to molest people is another'

245 posted on 11/14/2010 8:15:37 PM PST by Buddy B (MSgt Retired-USAF - Year: 1972)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
Not applicable against the regulatory agency overseeing a private enterprise.

Those are an interesting combination of words. It's the most concise difference you've put forward.
246 posted on 11/14/2010 8:17:11 PM PST by laxcoach (Government is greedy. Taxpayers who want their own money are not greedy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: DaveTesla

>>THE HELL they do!<<

Oh — no need for the FDA, FAA, etc? No need to check for food quality?

You ever READ the USC? The power to regulate commerce is explicit.

>>GROW a pair and stop licking theirs.<<

Quit wasting people’s time on the same stupid liberal plaintive whine of “it is MY RIGHT” when it isn’t by any definition except yours.

The one thing that waters down the defense of REAL rights is people who think and say every inconvenience is a violation of some misapplied Right (in this case a complete misunderstanding an application of the 4th as well as a complete misunderstanding of the rest of the USC and the powers it confers to the legislative and executing Branches).


247 posted on 11/14/2010 8:17:39 PM PST by freedumb2003 (IMHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003; DaveTesla

“Executing”=”Executive”

I clearly grow weary of educating people...


248 posted on 11/14/2010 8:20:13 PM PST by freedumb2003 (IMHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
Flight attendants union upset over new pat-down procedures

FR post on Wednesday, November 10, 2010 3:34:23 PM by Nachum

249 posted on 11/14/2010 8:20:43 PM PST by Buddy B (MSgt Retired-USAF - Year: 1972)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bvw

It’s been a long time since the Oak Ridge mouse (and other mammal) experiments. I agree with your concerns.

The BIER reports are based on old data, but they do seem to converge on 1% “excess cancers” above noise for every 10 REM whole-body exposure.

We will NEVER have the data, except by syndromic monitoring. We expose lots of people to the soft xray from CRT’s, for instance, and hope that nothing statistically significant comes up.

My original point, put in energy terms, reads like this: you get exposure to more energy on the actual flight than you get from the scanner, by a factor of hundreds to one.

The scanner dose, or energy, is less than or equal to natural background in most places (20 uR here according to a Ludlum scintillator).


250 posted on 11/14/2010 8:20:52 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: qwertypie
I hope that that SOB gets the full weight of the law.

What law would that be fruitcake?

251 posted on 11/14/2010 8:21:05 PM PST by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: qwertypie
Thumbsuckers belong under the bed.

With all of your self-proclaimed brilliance, you are unable to see the irony.

LOL at you.

252 posted on 11/14/2010 8:22:06 PM PST by savedbygrace (But God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

Comment #253 Removed by Moderator

To: bvw

Oops, I missed this one.

Yup, most of our data comes from Germany 1939-1945 (shudder), Manhattan, the Japanese bombings, and animal studies at HPRR at Oak Ridge. Maybe a bit more from RHIC Livermore on space radiation.

Not likely there will be more.

Terahertz, I think ADL did some microwave-millimeter wave-terahertz studies in the 70’s, using warehouses full of mice. Nothing conclusive was found, at least no clear hazard.

We are incapable of conducting meaningful studies on these issues now, I think. The data we have is the data we use.

I work a bit with THz, what amazes me is that it’s so close to light that lens structures are effective as antennas are. Not glass, naturally, but lenses and Fresnel plates can be used. With microwave, these structures would be huge.


254 posted on 11/14/2010 8:29:02 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: DaveTesla

You have no idea what you are talking about.

Buy a copy of the USC and then buy a clue.

get lost

/VI


255 posted on 11/14/2010 8:32:00 PM PST by freedumb2003 (IMHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

You just gave me a GREAT idea (I don’t know if I will do it, but if I have enough drinks and the right raw materials before going through security...)

Would it not be HILARIOUS of I was to make a vest and a codpiece from aluminum foil under my shirt and pants and then go through the PornoVision?

I could then yell “Your X-rays ain’t gonna get ME!!””

(OK, I probably won’t but it is a funny scenario).


256 posted on 11/14/2010 8:37:12 PM PST by freedumb2003 (IMHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

Comment #257 Removed by Moderator

To: patriot preacher

Maybe we should have a day where we protest this publicly at airports, if the current media noise level doesn’t do the job. I’d be willing to purchase a ticket and go to the airport and protest the 4th Amendment at security if it comes to that.


258 posted on 11/14/2010 8:42:04 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

Shoot. I bet he can drive from San Diego to South Dakota in 3 days.


259 posted on 11/14/2010 8:50:19 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Muslims are not the problem, the rest of the world is! /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle
“Maybe we should have a day where we protest this publicly at airports”

And if we don't, Where does it end?
First the airports......
Then where?

People are missing the point.
How does foreign Muslim terrorists equate to strip searching
grandma?

Simple.
Because it is not being done to stop terrorism but to set precedence.

260 posted on 11/14/2010 8:50:24 PM PST by DaveTesla (You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-295 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson