Clean-up on aisle 4!!
Posted on 11/13/2010 2:55:59 PM PST by DontTreadOnMe2009
Hannity was surprised to hear a famous ex Air Force General tell him “That Is A Missile, Shot From A Submarine!” I quote retired Air Force Lieutenant General Tom McInerney (ex commander of 11th Air Force in Alaska) “I spent 35 years flying fighters, and you can see the guidance system kick in, I have watched that film 10 times, I am absolutely certain that that is not an aircraft, but a sub launch ICBM missile!!!” See the video and judge his words for yourself. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LivRJOWrcpA&feature=player_embedded#! I will next post a clickable link.
Uh,....no. I was listening to John and Ken on KFI yesterday. They had a caller who stated he flew F-18s and the "missile" wasn't....a missile.
He also noted that if it had been a missile, Air Traffic Control in the LA area would have been inundated with calls from other aircraft asking "What the *ell was that we just saw?!" That didn't happen according to the caller.
So, I'll go with the contrail explanation.
Which of the following FACTS does the "sub-launched missile " definition fill?
1. There was no radar track from the FAA Los Angeles Regional Radar, Point Mugu NAS or Vandenberg AFB.
2. The DSP satellites which can detect the launch of a model rocket and send alerts to several command centers did not detect a launch.
3. Not one aircraft, ship, police officer, or surfer reported a launch.
Clean-up on aisle 4!!
I think we learned what the government thought about "We the people" on March 25, 2010...
Stone walling Americans....now now that is nothing new...they’ve done that for decades...
Same thing that is going on at several other forums. For example, one of the popular reasons for dismissing this general seems to be that he is "anti-obama". That is, all over the web, there is an almost unprecedented crawling-out-of-the-woodwork of dem "sleepers" who are now sent into the fray.
Which would be entirley understandable if deep investigation was to show that:
A. Obama was carrying an unprecedented entourage to Indonesia in order to make a big announcement.
B. There was a deal with his Iranian friends to help him blow an American city sky-high.
C. The ploy failed over one of your typical muzzie tech scr*wups.
“McInerny is spot on.”
No, he’s a typical combat pilot who’s personality is such that he is ABSOLUTELY sure he’s right, until he’s wrong.
You gotta love ‘em. The only pilots worse are test pilots.
We wouldn’t want them to be any other way. But it’s a contrail nonetheless and I don’t think we need to rehash the evidence.
They could be correct. Even if they are correct about a jet contrail doesn’t mean the latest incident is a jet contrail.
Asking questions is not the same as fear. Do you not think they also pay attention to how quickly we shut down free exchange of ideas?
Ah, but any of the rest of us are near racists for not towing the contrail line.
No kidding. We’ve got FReepers calling us “missile truthers” and some who are truly upset that we dare question the contrail story.
What is going on here?
Yes, I also noticed that and how vicious they were to attack;
I got told “go back to high school get your GED etc”
Wow
One would think we could talk about it civilly -— but not.
They mostly seem to have gone away (losing I guess) and I have NEVER seen a single one refute the 3 experts I have cited.
So I will ask them here, now, in advance (contrail angry trolls):
After 3 very well respected and indeed nearly famous experts tell us “ICBM missile launch”, what experts of any kind will speak for you?
so
Yes indeed what is going on here? Why are they so vehement?
It seemed so glaringly obvious to me from about the first three seconds ... and to many many others.
Dos anyone know where this launch alledgedly occured? How deep was the water there?
Says Who?
Were you at Cheyenne Mountain at the time?
It’s obvious the sun is to the west and in line with a horizontal contrail shadow. That cannot be rationally or logically denied. The moon could be over there too but would be overpowered by the sun.
Check contrailscience.com for more photos of the contrail shadow.
This is basic “the earth is round” high school physics.
If your judgement is true this can be replicated every day
about the same time. But it has not. Scheduled flights have this uncanny thing called a time schedule.
If this were flight 808 why no definitive answer?
There was a 24 hour stonewall by the Pentagon.
My guess is that Zer0 is in denial or just does’nt give a hoot.
I’ll take the word of a former secretary of defense and a retired AF General any day over the twerps in the media.
“Scheduled flights have this uncanny thing called a time schedule.”
Yes, but contrail conditions depend on something as mercurial as “the weather”.
I just emailed my Senator demanding an immediate and full investigations. I want to see the radar tapes out of LAX NOW!!!
The politically incorrect explanation of the 1996 TWA incident is: We gave surface to air missiles to Muslim misfits in Afghanistan. They gave a few to other Muslim misfits, who managed to smuggle them into the USA. TWA was carrying some Egyptian military after being trained in the US, the militant Muslims, probably Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood, launched that surface to air heat seeking missile. The US was too embarrassed to admit that within our territory, we were attacked.
If it was a missile, NORAD (North American Aerospace Defense Command) should know what track it took. After all their mission is to track and monitor all unknown aircraft or missiles in proximity or entering the US and Canada. There is nothing on their web site about this but they will be keeping an eye out for Santa later this year.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.