Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
To: markomalley
If that’s the worst thing that happens to your foreskin, testicle or penis in San Francisco before you reach the age of 18, you should count yourself lucky.
2 posted on
11/12/2010 12:27:36 PM PST by
Question Liberal Authority
(Worst. Post-Racial. And Post-Partisan. Agent Of Hope And Change. EVER.)
To: markomalley
Exceptions will be made for piercings, tattoos, and gender changes, of course.
3 posted on
11/12/2010 12:27:39 PM PST by
Natural Law
(lex orandi, lex credendi, lex vivendi)
To: markomalley
I think it’s the fat content of foreskins that has them worried.
To: markomalley
How about female circumcision?
Is that OK?
The Muzzies seem to like it
5 posted on
11/12/2010 12:28:19 PM PST by
Mr. K
(physically unable to see typos until I click 'post')
To: markomalley
Well, the only reason the Kalifags are against circumcision
is because there is just no end to those pricks.
6 posted on
11/12/2010 12:28:40 PM PST by
CodeToad
(Islam needs to be banned in the US and treated as a criminal enterprise.)
To: markomalley
These same people think giving condoms to 10 year olds and abortions for them is just fine.
7 posted on
11/12/2010 12:28:48 PM PST by
GeronL
(http://libertyfic.proboards.com <--- My Fiction/ Science Fiction Board)
To: markomalley
Quacks “prescribing” pot to kids is fine though
8 posted on
11/12/2010 12:29:31 PM PST by
GeronL
(http://libertyfic.proboards.com <--- My Fiction/ Science Fiction Board)
To: markomalley
Next thing you know they’ll be banning anal sex.
9 posted on
11/12/2010 12:29:34 PM PST by
Mr Ramsbotham
(Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
To: markomalley; wagglebee
to make it a misdemeanor to circumcise, excise, cut or mutilate the foreskin, testicle or penis of another person who has not attained the age of 18. Like the "pierce and initiate" crowd in SF is going to stop at the recognized age of 18 as adulthood.
10 posted on
11/12/2010 12:29:50 PM PST by
a fool in paradise
(The establishment clause isn't just against my OWN government establishing state religion in America)
To: markomalley
to make it a misdemeanor to circumcise, excise, cut or mutilate the foreskin, testicle or penis of another person who has not attained the age of 18.
________________________________________________
And after age 18? Anything goes between consenting adults?
I’m betting this idea is fag oriented. It must be a gay thing. Uncircumcized penises feel bettter up the....
Forget it. Not gonna finish the thought.
12 posted on
11/12/2010 12:30:36 PM PST by
Responsibility2nd
(Yes, as a matter of fact, what you do in your bedroom IS my business.)
To: markomalley
This measure could make abortion illegal if it’s interpreted correctly.
15 posted on
11/12/2010 12:33:10 PM PST by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: markomalley
Why on earth should this person (or persons) care? Seriously.
16 posted on
11/12/2010 12:33:41 PM PST by
day10
(Integrity has no need of rules.)
To: markomalley
The government now owns your johnson....could your boys be next...hold tight onto them guys...
To: markomalley
“The Ten Commandments have lost their validity. Conscience is a Jewish invention, it is a blemish like circumcision. Adolf Hitler
19 posted on
11/12/2010 12:36:47 PM PST by
ari-freedom
(Islam is at war against America, while America is at the mall.)
To: markomalley
Isn’t male circumcision a ritual for both Jews and Muslims? Are there religious exceptions?
22 posted on
11/12/2010 12:39:03 PM PST by
reg45
To: Slings and Arrows
26 posted on
11/12/2010 12:39:58 PM PST by
day10
(Integrity has no need of rules.)
To: markomalley
![](http://www.site.rochesterbris.com/images/mohelim.png)
Remember when freedom of religion was protected under the First Amendment and honored in our country? I can think of quite a few Rabbis who will not be amused, not to mention their Boss, who probably is unimpressed with SF already.
27 posted on
11/12/2010 12:42:06 PM PST by
Pollster1
(Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
To: markomalley
when voters will be electing the San Franciscos next mayor would amend The Citys police code to make it a misdemeanor to circumcise, excise, cut or mutilate the foreskin, testicle or penis of another person who has not attained the age of 18.These are the same people who want to lower the age of consent to 10? When I saw this article I swore it was satire.
To: markomalley
If this passes, the California Supreme Court will rule this unconstitutional for reasons of infringing religious freedom.
How do I know??? I have a mohel on the Court who leaks information to me from time to time.....
29 posted on
11/12/2010 12:45:28 PM PST by
Notary Sojac
(I've been ionized, but I'm okay now.)
To: markomalley
Pushing for the queer vote.
30 posted on
11/12/2010 12:46:53 PM PST by
Iron Munro
(SAVE AMERICA - HELP STAMP OUT AFFIRMATIVE ACTION)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson