Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ban-happy SF targets male circumcision
Washington Examiner ^ | 11/12/2010 | Joshua Sabatini

Posted on 11/12/2010 12:25:33 PM PST by markomalley

The Board of Supervisors just banned toys in Happy Meals, which drew worldwide attention.

Now the latest ban being proposed in San Francisco is on male circumcision.

A proposed ballot measure for the November 2011 ballot – when voters will be electing the San Francisco’s next mayor – would amend The City’s police code “to make it a misdemeanor to circumcise, excise, cut or mutilate the foreskin, testicle or penis of another person who has not attained the age of 18.”

Doing so would result in a fine of up to $1,000 and up to one year in jail, according to the proposed measure submitted to the Department of Elections.

The measure was submitted by San Francisco resident Lloyd Schofield, who has spoken up on this issue in the past.

He was not immediately available for comment.

For the ordinance to make it on to the November ballot, it would require the collection of 7,168 valid signatures by April 26, 2011.

It's unknown if Schofield approached members of the Board of Supervisors asking them to vote on such a measure before deciding to take it to the voters.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; circumcision; culturewar; judeochristian; napl; sanfrancisco; sanfransicko; sexpositiveagenda; sheeruttermadness
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: markomalley
Well, they're officially Nazis now.
61 posted on 11/12/2010 1:21:09 PM PST by Rashputin (Barry is totally insane and being kept medicated and on golf courses to hide the fact)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: day10

You may be correct. Post 38.


62 posted on 11/12/2010 1:24:05 PM PST by ColdOne (Repeal HealthCare......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Gator113
Perhaps these freaks have gotten this procedure confused with Happy Meals."

Actually, this is an extension of the McDonald's' regulations in that it ensures privately served Happy Meals are all natural.

Regards

63 posted on 11/12/2010 1:29:24 PM PST by Rashputin (Barry is totally insane and being kept medicated and on golf courses to hide the fact)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

How is this going to sit with their butt buddys the mooslims? How can they keep sucking up to them and ban a religious practice? How can they continue with their implementation of Sharia law in SF if the city council does stupid things like this?

Why did they only rule about male circumcision? Aren’t they concerned about female genital mutilation?


64 posted on 11/12/2010 1:46:52 PM PST by Truth is a Weapon (If I weren't afraid of the feds, I would refer to Obama as our "undocumented POTUS")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rashputin

LOL...

Cheers


65 posted on 11/12/2010 1:54:54 PM PST by Gator113 (Beauty will devour the Beast in 2012. Kill "Obamamosque"@ Ground Zero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
"If you're against abortion circumcision, just don't have one."
66 posted on 11/12/2010 1:58:18 PM PST by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (Starve the beast. Save the liver!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

“It’s just tissue.”


67 posted on 11/12/2010 1:59:14 PM PST by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (Starve the beast. Save the liver!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Okay, first, I originally saw this on my iPhone and thought it said “Bun-happy”.

Second...what about the inalienable right of each and every teenage San Franciscan to get a Prince Albert? This oppression will not stand.


68 posted on 11/12/2010 2:14:54 PM PST by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law

...As well as forced female circumcision, provided it’s practiced as a religious ritual by those in the religion of peace.


69 posted on 11/12/2010 2:20:03 PM PST by DPMD (~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

And who still thinks that “progressives” and Nazis (national socialists) are not “birds of a feather”?


70 posted on 11/12/2010 2:41:09 PM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

And Judaism.


71 posted on 11/12/2010 2:58:49 PM PST by FrogMom (No such thing as an honest democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: FrogMom
And Judaism.

Of course. I was just responding to the suggestion, above, that this targets Jews and not Muslims.

72 posted on 11/12/2010 3:16:04 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Question Liberal Authority

Soooo glad I wasn’t eating or drinking at the time...


73 posted on 11/12/2010 3:23:35 PM PST by greatplains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

I’m old and don’t care anymore???? I learned that expression from the guys on Free Republic....blame them...:O)


74 posted on 11/12/2010 4:59:05 PM PST by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: day10; MeekOneGOP; Conspiracy Guy; DocRock; King Prout; Darksheare; OSHA; martin_fierro; ...
It won't do them any good to fine the mohels - they work for tips.


75 posted on 11/13/2010 12:13:16 AM PST by Slings and Arrows (You can't have IngSoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

76 posted on 11/13/2010 12:15:29 AM PST by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

I strongly oppose circumcision, but this is just more fascism from the “we know better” crowd.


77 posted on 11/13/2010 11:58:09 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (Anyone who says we need illegals to do the jobs Americans won't do has never watched "Dirty Jobs.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

The reason why they want to ban it is because men without a Circumcision have a much higher rate of HIV. Thier goal (radical lefty gays) is to have a much higher rate of transfer.


78 posted on 11/13/2010 5:05:15 PM PST by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Wouldn’t this qualify as discrimination against Jews?


79 posted on 11/13/2010 9:24:44 PM PST by LibertyRocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goat granny

Thanks to Obamacare that is essentially the case, is it not? They’re all hypocrites as well - after years of chanting “keep your laws off our bodies”. It makes it that much worse, IMHO.


80 posted on 11/13/2010 9:27:38 PM PST by LibertyRocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson