Posted on 11/11/2010 1:18:05 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
That’s a third of all abortions taxpayer funded in the US.
Read what I said again. Does it imply women choosing NOT to abort are scum? It means that women that follow through on the CHOICE (i.e., abort for convenience) are. A person that would murder for convenience is scum in my opinion.
The name of the organization is pure propaganda. There is nothing in their work that prepares young men and women to responsibly plan or prepare for becoming loving parents i.e. marriage and financial security.
These monsters should be referred to as Parasites for Profit through Perversion, Promiscuity and Infanticide.
They sued her? Wow.
ping
So the government is paying over a thousand dollars apiece for abortions.
“Why would any organization want to encourage abortion with that kind of risk for the woman?”
Follow the money. There’s big money in diseases like breast cancer and HIV/AIDS.
You have summarized the essence of the fraud. It has never been about "choice!"
It has ever been about who pays for promiscuity; the perps or the taxpayer.
That summarizes the decades of hysterical shouting by the perverts. The premise, that the "landmark US Supreme Court case establishing that most laws against abortion violate constitutional right to privacy, ..." was so absurd and self serving that it boggles the brain.
Even "Jane Roe" (Norma McCorvey,) on whose behalf the suit was originally filed, grew up and opposes Roe vs Wade.
No matter; it was all about the money, not "rights," certainly not the taxpayers'!
How appropriate. She’s wearing BLOOD red.
I didn't have any problem understanding it.
I just don't agree that if the prospective parent(s) are likely to be criminally incompetent (or insane,) that the taxpayer should bear the financial burden of supporting the likely new criminals and the criminal parents for life; often for generations.
If spaying the irreponsible were a workable alternative, that makes much more sense, and many of us might opt for that solution. Another solution that treats the taxpayer as mercifully as it does the perps is national orphanages privately run by religious institutions. Imposed charity ceases to be charity; as demonstrated by the current national financial condition; it more closely resembles, or is, taxpayer slavery.
I utterly fail to find any response or suggestion on this thread to justify that question. Your wife didn't abort; Shows maturity, character and a sense of responsibility. You chose to see it as applying to her, not the writer.
It is unfortunate that many biological experiences need to be defined by some as victimhood. The temptation to use victimhood as a means to get attention is (fill in a reason.)
Well, here’s another $350 million to add to the task force savings!
About the same funding amount for Public Broadcasting.
Now, what do we spend on the totaly worthless UN??
More babies killed then American Men and Woman who died in WW2. No wonder god is going to punish us...
BTTT!
Defund PP, the UN, and PBS.
That’s $1,070 per dead baby....per abortion. America should be ashamed to subsidize that horror, but I suppose that is the going rate!
“Genocide for profit. Worse than Hitler.”
Right you are.
You’re probably right about the studies being flawed, but you can’t deny that breast cancer rates have gone up considerably since Roe v Wade. It could definitely be coincidental, but other than the pill, what is so different for women over the past 50 years that could explain the rates going up?
You little people pay your taxes and have a nice day. :)
So... she got a little over a Dollar per abortion.
If she could just increase the number of abortions, she could improve her income.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.