“Group?” Must have been a circle jerk.
In support troops, sure—not in front-line units. And just out of curiosity, how many members of the “study group” have actually served in combat units?
You mean because there is a distinct correlation between the number that join during a war and a war
The fact that the pro-homosexual forces are selectively leaking this stuff tells me there is plenty in the report that doesn’t support the repeal of DADT. They want to get out on front of the release, condition the public, and prime the political process so they can twist the results to their advantage.
It’s impossible for me to read anything past the word “nuanced”.
A civilian “Pentagon group”, no doubt.....
I am sure they did....I am absolutely confident the are disregarding my inputs. the paper I wrote for them, the books on the issue, the former Chiefs of Staff and Chairmen of the joint Chiefs and all the men and women who have been relentlessly talking to them about it. Why? Becuase its political.
Gays are succesfully working to get Government commanded legitimacy. they can not get it at the ballot box or in the public square...so they will carve it out of our nation this way.
Why would any sane person join the US Military while this guy is in charge? Believe me, it was bad enough under President Carter, but we weren’t at war so the funding problems were more of a nuisance. Once President Reagan got going it was like night and day!!
And what group would that be, the Log Bunker?
Was the poll a securely confidential one?
If not, it is statistical trash.
A good idea when we start looking at defence cuts is to start with these two commie bastards and the rest of them in the puzzle palace.Great place to start.
Is recruitment that bad that we have to hire sexual deviants to do our fighting for us? If so, this country is in big trouble.
Which CZAR is heading this group?