"She's too polarizing! But Mitt Romney/Mike Huckabee would be fine choices"
I notice that Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee have been making the rounds and having surrogates talk down Palin as a legitimate candidate while they campaign. Excellent timing, guys! The problem is that now we see that you're scum...........
Screw them,she has as much of a right as the rest of us.
W told Rush on his show today that he never said that about Sarah nor would he.
FUGOP
I like her(I really do), but I don’t think she stands a chance in hell of winning a presidential election. I believe she’s the ONLY person 0bama CAN win against at this point. The loony left base will crawl over broken glass to vote against her, and I don’t believe ‘independents’ like her all that much.(thank the McCain campaign and media for that)
If she eventually becomes the nominee, God I hope I’m wrong.... We as a nation can’t take another 4 years of BOzo.
If she IS the nominee and wins, please come back to this thread and ridicule me in 11.2012. I’ll happily take it.
There sure seems to be scant few willing to go on record to “stop Palin”. Who came up with this noise?
A leader is just that- one who leads.
A wise leader will surround themselves with counsel that is up to the task.
God imparts wisdom.
Man imparts knowledge.
God chooses leaders. Sarah Palin has His annointing.
I’ll be the one to run out on a rail if I’m wrong.
If Palin is not a viable candidate she will lose in the primaries, especially with so much of the old boy GOP against her. And its not like the MSM is going to choose her to be the pub candidate like they did McCain, even if they did think she would certainly lose to the dem. They cannot stand to say anything nice about her even if the ultimate goal is to destroy her.
So why are all the anti palin folk up in a tizzy over this and so worried about her running for prez?
We need someone who will draw a line in the sand and I think she is the one. If she is polarizing, so be it. All other candidates are so soft on basic issues that I would consider them in the same category as McCain. Until, and if, a better, stronger candidate emerges, my vote is for her.
Those trying pre-empot a Palin candidacy need to be exposed, and NOT because I say that to take sides on whether or not Sarah Palin should be GOP POTUS candidate.
How is it that they need to be exposed.
The GOP grass roots should say to each of them.
As follows:
O.K., we can look at the public record and see how many GOP candidates running for office did Palin personally endorse, personally campaign for or with, personally help raise funds for - not as a good-ole-boy collective - just herself; and how much did she personally help raise for those candidates. (most of whom won).
So, for each of these political class GOPers trying to pre-empt a Palin run - what did THEY personally do to help secure the majority we just obtained - THEM PERSONALLY, ALL ON THEIR OWN; each of them. How many candidates, how many fundraisers (for others) how much money raised - for others.
In terms of energy into the GOP, Palin far outweighs most of them.
FULL DISCLOSURE - (1) I have not yet made a 2012 POTUS choice. (2)I don’t like McPain, Romney or the Huckster, but I’m keeping my powder dry for, not those three but???? (3) But if a major body of the GOP elite thinks it’s going to pick the POTUS candidate all on their own, and don’t want the scruffy Tea Partiers or anyone else getting in their way, then my guess is that whether or not a Palin run is absolutely the very best thing, THEY’RE actions will drive the GOP grass roots support to Palin, and maybe even mine.
TO ALL GOP POLITICIANS - IF YOU WANT TO SUPPORT SOMEONE, DO SO; OTHERWISE SPEAK NO EVIL, DO NO EVIL AGAINST OTHER GOP CHOICES. LEAVE THE BACKROOM DEALS TO THOSE WHO ARE MUCH BETTER AT IT - THE DIMS.
I am not a Palin supporter. That’s the unvarnished truth. But if the Republican elite think they can trash the Tea Party and Sarah Palin so they can hold more sway over the party’s future direction, do they have another think coming!
It goes without saying how bad Obama is. We will replace him in 2012. What we replace him with is crucial.
Do we replace him with a Republican elite RINO? Do we replace him with a very popular but not as well informed person related to ‘the McCain Problem’, globalism, and international relations? Or do we replace him with a person that has a firm grasp of globalism, the George Soros problem, the threat McCain and company represents, and a firm grasp about all things Conservative?
We have to be very very careful who we select as our nominee in 2012. The last chance we had like this was in 1980. Thankfully we got Ronald Reagan.
We mustn’t chose friends or people we like, just because we do. We must very carefully vet our next nominee. If we don’t, it will probably be around 2044 before we get another chance.
With big opportunities come big responsibilities. Are we up to it? For our kids and grand-kids sakes, I pray so.
Republican elite, Sarah Palin may not be my cup of tea, but she’s worth a lot more than you morons.
You were thrilled with McCain as the nominee in 2008. Then you spit on the idea of O’Donnell winning in Deleware. Nuff said.
We have Rove and his merry men to thank for all of this conflict. While it was there just under the surface, Rove lit this thing on fire. Rove gave birth to this narrative.
Palin will stay on track. She is stronger than them, she WILL ultimately win.
It is clear now that the establishment Republicans do not have the best interest of our country at the forefront. Their only interest is personal.
Justice is coming, and a good many of those trying to undermine the Tea Party folks are scared to death that......... Justice comes for them.
>>> The former Alaska governor backed some 60 Tea Party candidates, about half of whom won, while targeting 20 Democrats for certain defeat. Eighteen lost.
However these numbers mean little until you determine if her intervention made a difference. Would the winners have won anyway, or the losers lost anyway if Palin had stayed home. This was a certain republican year. She can’t be assigned all the credit.
Palin clearly made a difference to the good for South Carolina with Haley. Likewise she screwed up things in Delaware irretrievably by assisting O’Donnell before the primary. Beyond that it’s not a clear picture. I’d be very interested in seeing a more complete analysis of her real impact.
I’m not persuaded she will run for president. But there is nothing wrong with being a kingmaker either.
So what Republicans have gone public against Palin? Steve Schmidt, this Baucus guy I never heard of, Rove, Murkowski. Pretty weak lot.
Good. I hope she makes the most of being the underdog and really capitalizes on not being the establishment choice. We Americans have come to hate politics as usual and tend to love the underdog!
All of this sniping is relatively meaningless at this point. If Palin wants to run then I don’t see any reason that she shouldn’t give it a shot. She has been damn effective as a leader against the Obama agenda and motivates the base better than any of the other GOP hopefuls out there. If she runs and wins the nomination I’ll gladly support her and hope for the best.
Mitch McConnell and the committee chairs didn't have the fortitude, the guts or, frankly, the balls to make it happen.
They could've dumped a little money in a couple of places and things would have been different.
I love how they use the ABC poll that sampled twice the number of dems but never mention the Rasmuseen or Gallup polls that show her around 50/50