This is completely insane.
Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.
Constitutional amendment is unconstitutional??
how exactly?
Response: Yep. A disaster on the bench.
How can the election board be prevented from certifying the election results if the question is a matter of constitutionality, not a question of whether or not the election was legal (fair)?
I am assuming this case is NOT brought on grounds of voting irregularities.
Then, how is it that other states have such laws?
The jihadis know how to defeat us from within. They use liberalism as a weapon against what was once a great country.
They are idiots.
Of course you cannot decide our cases on the basis of some other country’s laws.
And you can’t impose another system of law on our country unless you are acknowledging that you have had your legal system overthrown.
The people voted in Oklahoma, and as if California’s overturned electorate isn’t enough, this court is not just throwing it in their face; it’s shoving it down their throats.
It’s about time for the chicken feathers to meet the hot tar...
Gotta check that name out...U.S. District Judge Vicki Miles-LaGrange...hmmm
So this judge is saying that it is okay to consider international or Islamic law when deciding cases?
Let’s get this on record!
This judge does not have such authority.
To allow her to have this authority would separate the governed from the government.
This is serious stuff.
I am damn sick of judges pretending THEY get to write the Constitution. Seriously. Impeach this MORON and REMOVE her from the BENCH.
And Oklahoma--you go ahead an IMPLEMENT your Constitution! Tell this black robed self-anointed LEGISLATOR to SHOVE IT.
This is completely insane.
WHAT????????????????????
How the hell could anyone say that we should not ban sharia law in our courts even for one minute
So follow Limbaugh’s example and illustrate the absurdity: file an amicus brief in a death penalty using Sharia law to blunt the cries of cruel and unusual. Next challenge a liberal commentator in every discussion and ask them why the so-called “separation” clause of the First Amendment would not apply. See if they are willing to give equal weight to Canon Law of the Catholic Church.
Throw any fools that don't believe this in their own new city in any muslim oriented country or society and see what happens when they try and establish a different religion, a different way of life including atheism.
International and Sharia law dictate that this amendment is unConstitutional.
You have a nice day. :)
DUH! Well, of course, we want to consider whether or not to stone someone to death for adultery, or to chop off the right arm and left leg of someone who insults Mohammed. That's exactly the sort of thing the Framers had in mind when they set up our judicial branch. YEA! Bravo! Way to go, judge! You are truly a forward thinking visionary. /s
I can see the torches and pitchforks from my house.
Might I take this time to direct you to this previous thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2620447/posts
Reply number 19 might be of interest to you.
This is a joke, although a very bad one.
How long until a court just invalidates an election for, say, governor and senator and hands the election to the losing candidate because a win by the one people voted for would somehow be “unconstitutional?” Sounds absolutely ridiculous to me, but a lot of the things we’re arguing with the left about these days sounded ridiculous only ten or twenty years ago.