Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House seeks deal with GOP to ensure ratification of New START treaty
Los Angeles Times ^ | Nov. 6, 2010 | Paul Richter

Posted on 11/06/2010 4:28:48 PM PDT by La Enchiladita

The White House is scrambling to strike a last-minute deal with congressional Republicans to save its new nuclear arms treaty with Russia from a lingering death.

Obama administration officials are trying to win the support of the GOP point man, Sen. Jon Kyl of Arizona, to schedule a ratification vote in the upcoming lame-duck session rather than next year, when Republicans will hold six more Senate seats.

The treaty, which also awaits ratification in Russia, would lower each country's maximum number of long-range active nuclear warheads and set procedures for them to inspect each other's strategic nuclear bases.

...President Obama declared Thursday that one of his top priorities is approval of the treaty, which is known as New START and is perhaps his most tangible foreign policy achievement. But some senior Republicans, such as Sen. Richard G. Lugar of Indiana, predict there won't be time to take up the treaty this year.

(Excerpt) Read more at articles.latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Russia
KEYWORDS: bolton; hellno; jonkyl; kyl; nationalsecurity; nukes; putin; russkies; start
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
Liar-in-Chief back to his old tricks. I say it's time to stall START. Let GOP get back to their old tricks and be "the party of NO."
1 posted on 11/06/2010 4:28:52 PM PDT by La Enchiladita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

No way, Jose. Shut them OUT!!


2 posted on 11/06/2010 4:30:22 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Nuke the corrupt commie bastards to HELL!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

NO !!!


3 posted on 11/06/2010 4:30:26 PM PDT by DontTreadOnMe2009 (So stop treading on me already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DontTreadOnMe2009

This is much more than reducing # of missiles. No No


4 posted on 11/06/2010 4:31:43 PM PDT by shalom aleichem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

they say we are the party of NO so lets just continue that!


5 posted on 11/06/2010 4:32:33 PM PDT by ColdOne (Who Knew? MSNBC has ethics? Fired Keif!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

Kyle is a fool if he goes along with this. Why take a deal now, when you will be in a much better position to negotiate in a couple months?


6 posted on 11/06/2010 4:32:51 PM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita
I believe this Treaty is short on the inspection question.

I remember some dude saying "Trust but Verify". Hmmmm...Now who was that??

7 posted on 11/06/2010 4:33:27 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

This should be renamed the “FINISHED” treaty.


8 posted on 11/06/2010 4:33:54 PM PDT by CMailBag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

I hope the dimwits aren’t stupid enough to go along with him during the lameduck.


9 posted on 11/06/2010 4:33:54 PM PDT by nhwingut (Palin/Bachmann '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

The GOP better become the party of “No, we will NOT let you and your commie comrades weaken our nuclear deterrent.”


10 posted on 11/06/2010 4:34:02 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

Don’t take up the treaty until after 2012, and then take it up to throw away.


11 posted on 11/06/2010 4:34:15 PM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

The One is picking the easy stuff that almost nobody can say No to. He’ll come back later with the harder stuff, like a drug dealer. The Repubs need to be reminded that in his election night speech, Obama basically said he’s pushing his agenda ahead regardless of the will of people. He’s in legacy-salvage mode.


12 posted on 11/06/2010 4:34:25 PM PDT by Clock King (Ellisworth Toohey was right: My head's gonna explode.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

If the usurper is pushing it, it can’t be any good for America. It is very clear that our bad joke of a “president” would never do anything that might benefit the United States.


13 posted on 11/06/2010 4:34:52 PM PDT by Czar (NRA Life Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

Kyl should say drop your lawsuit against Arizona and then we’ll talk.


14 posted on 11/06/2010 4:35:08 PM PDT by liberalcide1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

First test of the RINO’s.

I hope the TEA Party is ready to pounce.


15 posted on 11/06/2010 4:35:16 PM PDT by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com <--- My Fiction/ Science Fiction Board)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

IN January we will have 47 on our side, and 6-8 Dems (from red states) who will have to toe the GOP line. That’s where the majority will be.


16 posted on 11/06/2010 4:36:21 PM PDT by nhwingut (Palin/Bachmann '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita
Just...say...NO!
17 posted on 11/06/2010 4:36:40 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

START was written when it was US vs USSR. It is now a new game, with multiple potential opponents, particularly including China. START needs to sunset. The Russians don’t have the funds to start a nuclear arms race anyway.


18 posted on 11/06/2010 4:38:02 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita
67 Votes required. Soory Charlie

IIRC, Obama's goal is total nuclear disarmament. Of course, then only enemies would have nuclear weapons.

He's an airhead!@!

19 posted on 11/06/2010 4:38:27 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

NO DEAL!!!!!!!!! NO DEAL!!!!!!!!!!!


20 posted on 11/06/2010 4:41:14 PM PDT by pollywog ("O Thou who changest not, abide with me.".......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson