[Gaffer]

This isn't a 'struggle'; it is a goal. Where else in this world would a Government pay a female to be 'baby-daddy-absent'? Where? AFDC, EITC, WICS, SCHIP, and on and on and on.... Where? There are literally millions of baby-making females, unmarried of course, shopping WalMart, Dollar General, et al spending YOUR money. Dressed in good clothes, drive good cars, go home to homes they don't pay for, and then wake up the next day to start it all over again....Oh....what do they do at night? They find another baby-daddy-absent to give them another meal ticket because the ones they have now are getting too old...(with 'tickets' of their own).....We need to stop this foolishness....

[blam]

"We need to stop this foolishness...."

You're just a mean-spirited Republican. (You actually expect these people to be responsible for anything?)

[stevio]

This isn't a 'struggle'; it is a goal.

That's how I see it too. I was working in the hood this summer and heard a woman say that her son has 12 kids. At first I thought "wow, more power to them", but the more I thought about it, the more I think that they're not all from the same mother.

[Free in Texas]

It’a a brilliant scheme, actually. ‘Grow your own’ voters! The Dems are farming them.

[x_plus_one]

Wow, how high can it go?

[BenLurkin]

[panaxanax]

You nailed it, Gaffer!

You know, I REALLY try not to profile people racially, I REALLY do. Anyone would have to admit to themselves that it is becoming very difficult not to when we keep seeing facts like this.

If I were black, I would be embarrassed of my race.

[tired1]

Where?

Great Britain, actually.

[ClearCase_guy]

This isn't a 'struggle'; it is a goal.

Bingo

[Niuhuru]

This is so stupid to call it a ‘struggle.’ This is a ‘struggle’ that is easily avoidable. Very easily avoidable. These women are bron with enough working against them enough, why add to it? They keep refusing to see the bigger world out there, which is bewildering to me since they are sabotaging themselves, not choosing to do better.