To: Chet 99
Sarah would make an AWESOME Secretary of Energy or Secretary of the Interior -- But she would have no chance in the general election for POTUS. Republicans need to keep that fact in mind for 2012. OTOH, she doesn't need to be subjected to crackpot attempts to "stop" her, either. That's ridiculous.
8 posted on
11/05/2010 11:21:30 PM PDT by
ExSoldier
(Life without God is like an unsharpened pencil: It has no point.)
To: ExSoldier
“But she would have no chance in the general election for POTUS...”
And you already know who does?
9 posted on
11/05/2010 11:25:21 PM PDT by
Luke21
To: ExSoldier
But she would have no chance in the general election for POTUS. Republicans need to keep that fact in mind for 2012. OTOH, she doesn't need to be subjected to crackpot attempts to "stop" her, either. That's ridiculous.
You could not be more wrong.
You do realize that when Reagan was running against Carter, he was down something like 63% to 37% several months before the election?
Using polls to make your point two years out before she has even announced is ridiculous.
To: ExSoldier
But she would have no chance in the general election for POTUS.
Here's proof for you about how wrong you are!
Harris Poll January 29, 1980:
CARTER NOW FAR AHEAD OF BOTH REAGAN AND BUSH
"President Carter so dominates the American political scene now that his margin over Ronald Reagan in a post-Iowa trial heat has risen to an overwhelming 65-31 percent."
Also, Time magazine ran a big story in March of that year basically saying Reagan was unelectable. Gallup had a poll in that time frame with Reagan down 25 points.
To: ExSoldier
Thats a bunch of BS.
I am sick and tired of those who say she is unelectable. You turncoats need to look at her for who she is and what she stands for.
Look at the real Sarah. not some media stereotype. the real Sarah Palin can win.
To: ExSoldier
"But she would have no chance in the general election for POTUS" - ExSoldier, CurrentImbecile
28 posted on
11/06/2010 2:21:48 AM PDT by
jla
To: ExSoldier
But she would have no chance in the general election for POTUS.You know Ex, they said that very same thing about Reagan. The American voter is a fickle thing -- you really never know which way they will jump.
46 posted on
11/06/2010 6:33:08 AM PDT by
misharu
(US Congress = children without adult supervision.)
To: All
Sarah would make an AWESOME Secretary of Energy or Secretary of the Interior — But she would have no chance in the general election for POTUS.
Kind of like moving the goalposts back
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Sigh....the meme evolves over the past two years
1. Sarah who?
2. Wolf killer, hick and throwback.
3. Choker on CBS.
4. Scandal magnet...damaged goods.
5. Quitter...she’s toast.
6. Well, sure, she can make a good populist speech to the tea party dogs (phhffffft).
7. Is only in it for the money and publicity (publicity whore).
8. Only good for electing “red-state fringers”.
9. Okay, okay, she’s good at raising money...as if that means anything. (eyes rolling)
10. Okay, okay, okay...she can can hang with us so long as she stays in the back of the bus. Maybe we can pigeon hole her as RNC chief.
11. Oh friggen kay, she can have a cabinet post, but shut her up.
12. She’s a highly valued team player but will never be POTUS. Let the beltway, bigboy RINOS take care of that. Can’t she just go away and hunt unicorns in Eskimo-land??? Sheesh!!!! The nerve of that beeoch!!!!
86 posted on
11/06/2010 2:41:19 PM PDT by
ak267
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson