A male is a male and a female is a female.
Changing the pipes around doesn’t change that one iota.
“A private members bill that would criminalize discrimination based on “gender identity” and “gender expression””
Gender expression? Does that mean I can hit on all my attractive female co-workers now without fear of reprisal?
After all, It’s only an expression of my male (sexist pig) gender...
/sarc, but making a point - even if I’m not sure what that point is right now...
The damage is much more immediate than that. Imagine a company being legally forced to hire a cross dresser to a public relations position. People aren’t going to go back to the “weird” guy at “that place”. Their company would be destroyed the moment the cross dresser turns in the application.
Next up — a law making it mandatory to issue driver’s licenses to blind people, even if they don’t pass their road tests.
What about “two spirited” ?
They are on the “diversity” list at work now.
Why stop with the transgendered.
Two spirited should be protected as well / SARC
There are two sexes, Male and Female.
In languages, particularly Romantic languages, one uses gender, Male, Female and things.
"Gender" when used by the left can and does allow for sex other than M and F, such as transgender.
Go back to using the original language.
Unfortunately, this thinking will seep across our border.
Ping.
As a British lady would say, "It gave me a real turn, dearie, it did".
Wow, let me tell you, there's few things more unsettling.
I never went back into that store till he was gone.
One would think the guy would dress as a male at least while working. No problemo.
The job was his and his alone to keep. But these transies HAVE to make statements. But not around me, let me tell ya.
It was the long false eyelashes that really did me in.
Leni
Fortunately, few private member’s bills are passed, but that this was even brought to the house is disturbing and indicative of the moral rot inherent in “progressivist” thinking.