Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: for-q-clinton

We may be better off having both the President and the Senate to run against in 2012


6 posted on 11/02/2010 5:55:24 PM PDT by sourcery (Don't call them "liberals" or "progressives." The honest label is extreme anti-Constitutionalists!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sourcery

Whether it’s better for our side or not, our side will have to deal with a Dem Senate.


10 posted on 11/02/2010 5:57:37 PM PDT by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: sourcery

I concur. While having the senate would allow us to screw up his nominees to the court, but we can still do that if we stick together.

But if we had both houses then the media would set us up like in 94.


13 posted on 11/02/2010 5:58:12 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: sourcery

I concur. While having the senate would allow us to screw up his nominees to the court, but we can still do that if we stick together.

But if we had both houses then the media would set us up like in 94.


14 posted on 11/02/2010 5:58:12 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson