Posted on 11/02/2010 8:04:57 AM PDT by listenhillary
"You wont find a lot of Keynesians here, explained one German economic policymaker in Berlin in September. That will not be news to anyone who has spoken to his counterparts in Washington. In their view, Germany is a skulker, a rotten citizen of the global economy, the macroeconomic equivalent of a juvenile delinquent, or worse. It is a smart aleck in the emergency ward that is the global economy. It is a flouter of the prescriptions of the new Doctor New Deal who sits in the White House.
Germany has been scolded, even browbeaten, by Obama administration officials, from Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner on down, for saving too much and spending too little. It has refused to stimulate its economy as the United States has done, on the grounds that the resulting budget deficits would not be sustainable and the policies themselves would not work. Administration officials have not been the only ones to warn the Germans about the path theyre on. On the eve of last summers G‑20 summit in Toronto, the economist and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman gave an interview to the German business paper Handelsblatt in which he said that, while Germany might think its deficits are big, they are peanuts from an American viewpoint. Germany cannot say it wasnt warned.
And now the consequences of Germanys waywardness are clear. Germanys growth in this years second quarter was 2.2 percent on a quarter-to-quarter basis. That means it is growing at almost 9 percent a year. Its unemployment rate has fallen to 7.5 percent, below what it was at the start of the global financial crisisindeed, the lowest in 18 years. The second-biggest Western economy appears to be handling this deep recession much more effectively than the biggestand emerging from it much earlier.
(Excerpt) Read more at weeklystandard.com ...
Let's hope you're right.
Obama wanted to brow beat other nations to increase deficit spending. Canada went into deficit in 2009, for the first time in over a decade. The main reason was the intense pressure to support Obama’s “stimulus package”. Harper knew this was politically necessary — but, bad economics.
Obama wanted to coerce the G20 to support more deficit spending. He got a resounding “NO!, NIEN!, NON!” as an answer.
BTW, when Canada switched from a faux-Keynesian policy of perpetual deficits, to a policy of surplus budgets, and debt reduction — we experienced the same higher growth & lower unemployment as Germany. We also experienced lower interest rates, lower inflation, and, eventually, more money available for spending on government programs. The later has made debt reduction popular, even amongst leftists. They don't like seeing money going to “greedy bankers”, for interest payments.
I’ll take that trade.
Hey...NFL fan idiots are not nearly as bad as NBA fan idiots!
I think that is what Krugman’s entire theory is based on. Why not spend infinite sums if you are going to get a $1.60 muliplier?
Precisely! It's a simple question, and there's no sensible answer to it. Only an ivory tower college professor could believe nonsense like this.
btt
Who actually likes beeing told what to do by drive-by consultants of wall street ?
Great post.
Many like to think that a US liberal democrat (abortion at 24 week, gay marriage, massive amnesties for illegal aliens, overtax the rich and big corporations, endless public stimulus...) look like a european centre-right conservative. Not true at all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.