Posted on 10/29/2010 10:43:48 PM PDT by 11th_VA
If the recent New York Times poll is right, women are breaking for Republicans in the midterm election.
While the paper of record doesn't explicitly break down the race or ethnicity of the women polled, it can be a safe bet that the polling shift comes mainly from white women.
Women, as a group, have been voting for Democrats over Republicans since 1982 - the year exit polling started breaking down voters into groups. It's usually the nonwhite women combined with a large minority of white women that pushes that group to the Democratic side.
White women, in general, have been voting Republican for a while, but not in as large numbers as their male counterparts. Barack Obama won 46 percent of white women's vote and 41 percent of white men. Al Gore won almost half of white women's vote with 48 percent.
So what is motivating white women, an important part of the loose-knit Obama coalition, to go Republican this year in larger numbers? Is it the anti-Obama rhetoric, which is infused with racism?
And perhaps more difficult to answer, why would any woman vote for candidates who are in direct opposition to policies that could benefit women, like minimum wage, a woman's right to reproductive health, breast cancer research, protections for the disabled, civil rights, job creation or pay equity?
Or why support candidates that attract campaign workers who would throw down and brutalize a woman because they don't agree with her? Like what happened to a female MoveOn.org supporter when she exercised her First Amendment rights at a Rand Paul event in Kentucky.
But that doesn't seem to be on some of the poll respondents' minds. The New York Times conducted a follow-up interview with respondent Judy Berg, an independent from Morton Grove, Ill. She said she voted for Obama in 2008 because she was "looking for a change." But she doesn't agree with Obama's kind of change.
This year Berg, who is a registered nurse, said she likes the Republicans better because she is pro-life. Plus, she said, "I'm also looking at the immigration issues and the tax issues. I like the Republican agenda on these issues better than the Democratic agenda."
For some reason, perhaps the always present yet always elusive idea that you will get rich, the tax hike on millionaires and billionaires has lost some popularity, according to The Times. Perhaps Berg is reflecting that in her comments about "tax issues" or it could be the state of Illinois budget crisis as well.
But it's the immigration issue that - more than others - could be fueling the white women shift to the right. The tea party/Republicans have been clever in recruiting other white women to go on the offensive on this issue: Sarah Palin, Sharron Angle, Michele Bachman, Christine O'Donnell, Linda McMahon, Jan Brewer, Meg Whitman and Carly Fiorina, to name a few.
According to the Times, more than 25 percent of respondents said they were willing to back a candidate with views that "seem extreme."
Sharron Angle is the face of the most extreme and racist take on immigrants and Latinos to date.
Julianne Hing of colorlines.com writes, "Grainy, high-contrast images of thuggish Latino-looking men wearing baggy jeans and doo rags mug at the camera, while innocent white babes squeal in their kindergarten classrooms like defenseless prey. All the while a menacing voiceover worthy of a summer-blockbuster trailer spells out the threat: Those scary immigrants, whose presence in the country is enabled by Democratic Sen. Harry Reid."
Joy Behar of "The View" had a throw down on national TV with Angle's racism - twice.
Getting some flack for calling Angle a "bitch," she didn't back down, telling the audience, "You know what's offensive? Watching those ads, and watching people who work for a living made to look like villains. That's what's offensive. Not what I said. Let's get that straight, America."
Rachel Maddow of msnbc travelled to Nevada and compared the atmosphere of racism towards Latinos similar to the legal segregation of Black people in the Jim Crow South.
She said, "When we as a country look back on the 2010 elections we will look back at Sharron Angle vs Harry Reid...and we will not believe this is really 2010 and this was really Nevada and this was not 1964 in the Deep South."
Now Angle's campaign is accusing Reid of plotting to steal the election with "ACORN-style tactics" (more racist fear-mongering).The campaign gives not one shred of evidence to support the claim. But they are raising money to deploy "literally dozens of election law attorneys and poll watchers to combat these tactics."
Translation: lawyers and other thugs challenging every black or brown voter, every college student or person with a union logo on their clothing. Other GOP candidates are planning similar vote suppression schemes.
Meanwhile, this tea party/GOP/corporate cabal is ganging up on a number of women politicians, targeting them for defeat, like Senators Barbara Boxer and Patty Murray, along with House members. And perhaps the most vilified woman in the country is history-maker House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
These anti-women candidates, including Angle, are being back by a host of billionaires and Wall Street interests. Interestingly enough, NPR recently uncovered another profit-making entity backing anti-immigrant legislation: private prisons. The industry actually helped to draft and pass Arizona's infamous Senate Bill 1070, from which they stand to gain hundreds of millions of dollars.
Polls are just a moment in time. The real poll will take place Nov. 2, and hopefully women voters will reject the racism and fear-mongering.
Who needs facts ...
Mrs. 40, a retired teacher and lifelong democrat, now votes conservative/Republican. Can she be a racist too even if she's white and is married to a black man?
What a slap in the face for women. Oh, make that white women. Last I heard, 46 and 48 weren't a majority. How about stating that the majority did NOT vote for them?
Sure, when have facts ever stopped a democrat from playing the race card?
Where to start with such nonsense?
Its sexist to presume all women think and vote alike.
But that hasn’t stopped liberals from presuming women should be in favor of all the things they are.
That’s not sexism. Not at all.
Just typical white women......just typical like Toots.
Yes...I’m voting Republican...I can’t help myself...I’m scared and not thinking right....and I’m stupid, a racist and sick of gays on TV and in the news
They must really be feeling freakout level panic if they think this is going to change anyone’s mind.
“And perhaps more difficult to answer, why would any woman vote for candidates who are in direct opposition to policies that could benefit women, like minimum wage, a woman’s right to reproductive health, breast cancer research, protections for the disabled, civil rights, job creation or pay equity? “
‘Cause these policies don’t benefit women.
Minimum wage keeps us out of entry level jobs. And it keeps our sons and husbands out, too. Abortion kills more female babies and males; also destroys women. Breast cancer research is great if it’s really research, and not a giant entitled industry. The Democrat “health legislation is actively destroying the greatest health care system in the world. We’ve heard about women with breast cancer in the UK, etc. Protections for the disabled sounds good, until you get discriminatory the other way, and our families can’t build a restaurant for 50 people without installing a $75,000 elevator. Civil rights are great, but homosexuals are people who have chosen a particular behavior. Governments don’t create jobs. And pay equity is a total job killer.
Maybe we’ve noticed these things.
Why would any sane woman (white, black or brown - or shades in between)ever again vote for a president or party that surrendered in the War on Terror - thus allowing radical islamics to place bombs inside UPS or FEDEX trucks coming thru the neighborhood...?
Or why vote for a party / POTUS that jammed obama-care down your throat - taking away much of your prior access to medical care for your elderly parents, grandparents, your own children and yourself...?
Or why vote for a party / potus that placed your own job and that of your family members in great jeopardy - or took it away altogether!
Why vote for fools that would and did indeed burden you and your children and unborn grand-babies with an impossible mountain of federal debt - all in the name of so called fairness...?
Lots more reasons but my fingers grow weary...
Problem for democrats is those white women have had their husbands laid off, or they they themselves have been laid off...no workie socialism..lost medical coverage etc etc etc thanks to the democrats...Hope it opens their eyes for more than just one election.
I love your tagline.
Also, if these white women helped elect Obama in 2008 were they still racists then?
Where’s the link?
Was this a news story or a paid DNC ad?
Since I’ve always voted republican that isn’t a issue for me. My problem is the TN state GOP don’t run candidates in my district, and I can’t afford to move, because the house is not going to sell in any market for even a fraction of what it is worth, and it is PAID FOR! We are now down to IRS short form.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.