Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Open Letter to Rush Limbaugh from Hillary operative - Democrats incompatible with patriotism
hillbuzz.org ^ | October 27, 2010 at 5:47 pm | Kevin DuJan

Posted on 10/28/2010 3:14:56 PM PDT by Optimus Maximus

Dear Rush,

It’s my great hope that some of your listeners find a way to get this letter to you, or that it makes it to “Snerdley” and finds its way into your hands. I don’t think even you understand just how much damage Obama has done to the Democrat Party — to the point where formerly lifelong Democrats like myself, and everyone here at HillBuzz.org, are actively working to expose the party and literally burn it to the ground for the good of the country.

(Excerpt) Read more at hillbuzz.org ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: elections; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
Wow. Looks like we have, at the very least, a "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" objective we can share with some Hillary supporters...
1 posted on 10/28/2010 3:14:57 PM PDT by Optimus Maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Optimus Maximus

If this is truly the case, why did Obama win with such a large margin?


2 posted on 10/28/2010 3:24:46 PM PDT by no dems (DeMINT / PALIN 2012 or PALIN / DeMINT 2012.......Either is fine with me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Optimus Maximus

Operation Chaos gave us Obama.

Don’t make the same mistake with Hillary! She is never “our friend”.


3 posted on 10/28/2010 3:29:57 PM PDT by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

“”If this is truly the case, why did Obama win with such a large margin?””

Alot of enthusiasm among blacks and twice as much fraud.


4 posted on 10/28/2010 3:35:40 PM PDT by getitright (If you call this HOPE, can we give despair a shot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Optimus Maximus

Already posted!! see here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2616390/posts


5 posted on 10/28/2010 3:36:11 PM PDT by Renfield (Turning apples into venison since 1999!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

He cheated in the primary, and had no competition in November except for the VP nominee.


6 posted on 10/28/2010 3:36:52 PM PDT by libbylu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Optimus Maximus

Let’s see how many of them vote against democrats next Tuesday before we start singing Kumbaya with them.


7 posted on 10/28/2010 3:36:52 PM PDT by Iron Munro (This is our culture; fight for it. This is our flag; pick it up. This is our country; take it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Optimus Maximus

Note that this PUMA pro-Hillary operative says that, due to Obama’s actions toward Hillary, they now call it the Democrat party (and not Democratic) because there is ‘nothing Democratic about it’.
This confirms my impression of the posts on FR lately that are anti-Obama and are allegedly written by an insider ‘source’ who is leaking information damaging to Obama. Many here have pointed out that the ‘source’ leaking info re Obama is not credible, that it appears to be fiction written by one or more persons with an axe to grind. A FReeper wondered aloud why this supposed 30 year Dem operative ‘source’ cited in prior threads referred to the ‘Democrat’ party when it’s known that Dems call themselves the ‘Democratic’ Party. I think this helps identify who is leaking fictional anti-Obama information (e.g. claiming he’s losing his mind etc.); the leaks help Hillary and the leaker used the PUMA term ‘Democrat’.
I consider this thread to contain information similar to the anonymous ‘source’ threads earlier: the amoral Democrats want a do over. They lied cheated and stole (which this thread content confirms; the Puma said she always knew Dems cheated and what did she do about it?; it only mattered when Dems stole from Dems) to put Obama in office and since it’s not working out, they dont’ want the electorate to act, they want to select again. Both the author of the content linked on this thread and the prior anonymous ‘source’ are trying to say that we haven’t seen ‘real Democrat’ leadership yet. That’s the meme now. Just like the way they say that everytime communism fails, it’s only because it wasn’t implemented right. Well I still remember Hillary talking about re-distribution of wealth the same way Obama did.


8 posted on 10/28/2010 3:38:56 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems
If this is truly the case, why did Obama win with such a large margin?

Yes - I am extremely skeptical. The PUMAS were supposed to stop Ol' Stinky from being elected in the first place, werent't they?

9 posted on 10/28/2010 3:39:55 PM PDT by Mygirlsmom (TEANAMI INCOMING! Jump in or get out of the way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Optimus Maximus

I don’t know. This is a very long letter. Something about it just doesn’t pass the smell test. But then, I’m a suspicious person anyway when the left comes bearing gifts . . . .


10 posted on 10/28/2010 3:40:35 PM PDT by jeffc (OBAMA - One Big A$$ Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Optimus Maximus

“This is also when most of us stopped using the term “Democratic Party”, since there’s nothing “democratic” about these people. They are the “Democrat Party”, and even that is hard to acknowledge because they really and truly have proved themselves to be enemies of real democracy.”

For those following the Insider threads, he/she uses the term Democrat Party. Interesting.


11 posted on 10/28/2010 3:42:10 PM PDT by Raebie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

It wasn’t that large a margin ....ok, the electoral college margin (365 vs 173) was wide but it was not a mandate by a long shot ... ...suffice to say, Obama’s election margin, 53-46, is not a large margin .


12 posted on 10/28/2010 3:44:43 PM PDT by SkyDancer ("If You Don't Read The News You're Uninformed, If You Do Read The News You're Misinformed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Optimus Maximus
Don't be so goofy. There ARE people who supported Hillary who feel they were bamboozled, but there aren't enough of them to form a knitting circle. This is bogus. The author of the piece pushes all the right buttons, says all the things moderate Americans believe, but I don't buy this. Not for one tiny second. They will put him back in office — same as they'll return Boxer, Frank and Moonbeam. They do think that anyone who doesn't support Obama’s policies are racists and enemies of the state. This is pure pandering to get folks to think they haven't tipped over, but they have.
13 posted on 10/28/2010 3:44:43 PM PDT by Constitutions Grandchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Optimus Maximus

I just about fainted as I read this. Three cheers for this guy!


14 posted on 10/28/2010 3:55:01 PM PDT by Dudoight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Optimus Maximus; onyx; penelopesire; SE Mom; maggief; Liz; Nachum; nutmeg; SunkenCiv; thouworm; ...

Your title addition is curious.

~ ~ ~

HillBuzz Posts Open Letter to Rush on Reverse Operation Chaos

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_102810/content/01125108.guest.html

Excerpt:

But basically the open letter to Rush Limbaugh from the guys at HillBuzz.org is saying that they are doing everything they can to oppose Obama and burn the party to the ground for the good of the country. These guys claim to be leading the charge to burn the Democrat Party to the ground.

It started with them over the way Hillary was treated. They originally were Hillary supporters, Hillary Democrats. But now they’re part of the voting bloc out there that’s just fed up with the party at large and especially Obama. They’ve been upset with Obama and his campaign from the get-go because of what they did to Hillary but now it’s expanded. It’s gotten even larger.

Now they’re just totally devoted to bringing down the Democrat Party at large. Now, I have to be honest. The HillBuzz confuses me a little bit because they claim to like Sarah Palin, and I don’t know how you like Sarah Palin and Hillary at the same time.

I’ve gotta explore this a little deeper, and I shall. (interruption) Well, I don’t know it’s a gene thing or not. No, no, no. I am not by any stretch of the imagination saying that the guys at HillBuzz have a genetic defect whatsoever.

But clearly they are devoted to the destruction of the Democrat Party.

Now, maybe they see the way Palin has been treated and they’re upset by it, but regardless — make no mistake about it — their open letter to me is for me to understand what they think the media is ignoring and what a lot of people know and ignore.

There are basically two things going on:

There are scandals brewing and have been brewing in the Obama administration that the Republicans are gonna zero in on after they win next Tuesday or sworn in in January, and that the Democrat Party at large needs to be brought down — and it is — because there are Democrats in droves leaving the party.


15 posted on 10/28/2010 3:56:06 PM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Optimus Maximus

Reads like an epiphany to me. The type of letter that a cuckolded spouse writes when in the despair of betrayal.

We have been praying that decent Democrats wake up - and yet when an articulate, ardent Hillary supporter no less - arrives unsolicited and repentent - we are SKEPTICAL???

Do you not believe in miracles?

I do!


16 posted on 10/28/2010 4:04:47 PM PDT by sodpoodle (Despair; man's surrender. Laughter; God's redemption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Optimus Maximus

They keep sending these “open letters”, since it’s been posted so often.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2616390/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2616037/posts

Curious, isn’t it? Almost like someone doesn’t understand the search function.


17 posted on 10/28/2010 4:12:03 PM PDT by humblegunner (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

I ALWAYS call it the Democrat Party.

I’ve done so for decades and I’m a lifelong Republican, not a PUMA.


18 posted on 10/28/2010 4:26:45 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
Agree with your Post 8.
Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton is as big a red as pResident Obama. Just probably a bit more competent.
After spending decades of engaging in class and race warfare; trashing our Constitution; disparaging our history; supporting abortion on demand; trashing Christians; supporting homosexuality -- I frankly don't care whether they call themselves the Democrat Party or Democratic Party. I just long for the day I can call them extinct.
19 posted on 10/28/2010 4:38:49 PM PDT by El Cid (Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

53-46, is not a large margin .
______________________________________________________________

PULEEEEZE!!!


20 posted on 10/28/2010 5:11:06 PM PDT by no dems (DeMINT / PALIN 2012 or PALIN / DeMINT 2012.......Either is fine with me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson