PING!
Lower prices for cars, lower car insurance, and lower gas prices.
Congestion isn't happening so much on the interstates which was the purpose for federal funding.
How about high speed chair lifts like at ski areas? They move 4000 people per hour. I guarantee you a couple hundred of those would still be cheaper than the toy trains.
Let the government do it................./s
What do I win?
Tar and feather the likes of Willie Green. GPS guided autonomous vehicles with sensory radar are where it's at for single-driver vehicles, scaling up through rentals, jitneys, buses, and then buses on dedicated ROW. Rail is only appropriate for very high density population corridors, which themselves represent a misallocation of land because of crooked zoning and regulation.
Don't they read their own stuff?
The most obvious question relating to transportation issues is "Why drive at all?" Several things obstruct elimination of much of the need.
Telecommuting could reduce fuel consumption, smog, and would produce high-paying jobs in equipment and software. It also makes more time for family. Telecommuting has been severely hindered by the lack of the "last mile" of the specialized cable capable of carrying high-speed Internet service into the home. The Public Utilities Commission effectively delayed telephone companies from running fiber optic cable into the home by forcing phone companies to rely exclusively upon their copper wires (supposedly to protect the poor and seniors from rate increases, of course, such a strategy didn't mean anything to cable operators).
25% of all local trips are for errands. Whether driving kids to school, shopping, or making deliveries. The Internet could provide the link that allows coordination all purchases for the home to be bundled into a single delivery. Guess who is in the way?
It is amazing how much more traffic there is after Labor Day. The reason? Schools. Why are we driving to classrooms and libraries when we have the Internet? Why do we have bricks and mortar schools at all? One could put lectures online, with Q&A over Skype, and testing proctored at the local strip mall. There is no legitimate reason for that many trips other than paying bad instructors too much money while wrecking family integrity in the process.
It's not just the teachers either. The US Postal Service is expensive and inefficient; the virtual monopoly they hold in daily home delivery restricts the opportunity to bundle mail delivery with food, clothing, and other purchased items. From an economic perspective, it's time to end it.
To improve the competitiveness of Internet sales, customers need a better sense of what they are buying online. Interactive voice and picture communications not only rapidly improve transactions, they also broaden the market to include the computer illiterate. Without high-speed cable into the home, none of it is possible. Maybe that's a reason why the dot-com bust was as bad as it was?
Another reason for high-speed cable is to enable customized mass communications necessary to eliminate the need for commuting to schools. It is most instructive to drive a major highway before and after Labor Day. The traffic flow for education alone is significant.
Many Californians would swear that they can't afford to stay at home with their kids, but if they understood how much of their income from that second job went to taxes, daycare, extra driving, or tutoring and counseling to deal with the mess public schools make of their kids, they would probably quit now. Add the prospect of telecommuting and the choice becomes truly compelling.
With that broadband, there would also be less reason to fly, a fact being proven every day by web-conferencing. Considering the security concerns associated with air or rail travel, the costs of hotel accommodations, car rental, restaurant food, and the absence at home, web-conferencing looks quite attractive.
The above is still insufficient to eliminate the need to buy that extra car. There will always be the need for an occasional day-trip while at work, an emergency delivery, or a non-emergency trip to the hospital where the bus just doesn't cut it. Here again, the market is headed toward the solution and government is in the way. It is increasingly common for car rental companies to disperse their fleet for day use and deliver the car. Jitney services, similar to the airport shuttle vans could coordinate trips online, and provide more customized services than a bus ever could, but what do you know but that counties almost always restrict the number and type of cab licenses!
We need simply deregulate taxis, and put them on the web with GPS and AI to optimize trip combination. A bidding system could access closer cabs for shorter wait times. Put it all together: telecommuting, web-conferencing, Internet shopping with consolidated home delivery, online home education, intelligently distributed rental cars and jitney services and many traffic problems would virtually vanish. It only happens if government gets out of the way. But what about the poor? How do they get around in this system?
Government could obviously fund transportation vouchers or discounted ticket prices as they do now for bus or light rail service, especially after having reduced the need via communications services. It certainly beats paying off bond debt and operating subsidies necessary to support massive mass transit projects.
Finally, there is a future in making our highways more efficient that bears discussion. We could load the highways with many more cars and run them at higher speeds than is currently safe for traffic if all the vehicles were under some form of automatic control. For most people, that is rightly a very scary issue, because who wants to cede control of their car to a government agency?
It doesn't have to be that way. One can either control the cars on an automated road, or automate the cars and have them work things out among each other. The latter, being a distributed control system, is actually more robust but would require the very sophisticated global positioning systems now in development.
The big advantage of a distributed system is that the cars could conduct negotiations. Think of what it would be like to be paid to get out of the way so someone could whip through traffic at a 100mph while you were working instead of paying attention to the wheel. Freedom makes it possible. Don't accept anything less.
Walt Disney had some interesting ideas for mass transportation. The original EPCOT was suppose to be an “Experimental Prototype City of Tomorrow. When Walt died the heirs decided to change his plans into just another theme park - guess they didn’t think it could be done... (Just like what was said about DisneyLand..) Anyhow, his 50 year old transportation plans could be adapted to something useful and cheap...
Interesting perspective. I'd make the case that the establishment of the U.S. interstate highway system and the invention of the shipping container -- both of which occurred in the mid-1950s -- were probably the two biggest developments in modern transportation as it relates to America's prosperity.
Nearly every scheme advocated in the supposed "equal time" article argues for statist solutions.
The Christian Science Monitor used to be a newspaper worth reading. Now it's just another piece of 'Rat / Elite propaganda with declining readership.
My (and Willie's) local paper, the Houston Carbuncle, lost another 10% of readership again this year, continuing the long term death spiral caused by its unpopular and virulent advocacy of left wing candidates, causes and views. Like used toilet paper, it circles the bowl for a while before going totally down the drain.
Better batteries charged by nuclear power.