Posted on 10/27/2010 9:19:47 AM PDT by mandaladon
In a last-ditch effort to salvage the Democratic majority, President Obama is encouraging Hispanic voters to remain inspired by stalled immigration "reform" to vote against Republicans on Election Day. More importantly, President Obama is inspiring his constituents to punish our enemies and reward our friends, encouraging a similar kind of thugocracy we have seen with labor unions.
In a radio interview that aired on Univision yesterday, Obama assured Hispanics that immigration overhaul was next on the agenda, despite the lack of Republican support:
If Latinos sit out the election instead of saying, "Were going to punish our enemies and were gonna reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are important to us," if they dont see that kind of upsurge in voting in this election, then I think its going to be harder, and thats why I think its so important that people focus on voting on November 2.
(Excerpt) Read more at thenewamerican.com ...
such a childish idiot...
I don’t see what all the fuss is about. “Enemy” is a rather elastic term. We who are conservatives really are enemies of the hard core left, just as they are enemies of us. I have no problem recognizing that condition. I would make the distinction that being an enemy does not necessarily entail literal “hand to hand combat,” but does involve a difference of objectives so extreme that, in order for one side to win, the other side must lose. That can apply to a friendly game of chess, military warfare, or the present clash of visions for the future of American culture. For those who love freedom and good as we have known it in our America, Obama really is our enemy, and we his. Only we will be using the ballot box not the bullet box to engage our enemy next Tuesday. May God grant us victory.
Ben Laden just told France he would punish his enemies.
Reminds me of the scene in Gone With the Wind:
Well give you forty acres and a mule because were your friends and we want you to
vote the way your friends do.
And I look forward to meeting that violence with overwhelming force. "I'll be your huckleberry."
I love this thuggery. He can say this about us, but if we say something similar about him we get his SS heavies knocking on our door. The Chicago way is becoming the American way.
Look at the violence inherent in the system!
Only this time, it's serious.
It is sad to lack the ability to inspire love.
It is pathetic to lack the ability to inspire hatred.
Oblivion is all that remains for the one, and he knows it..
Nixonian
I tought he was the main a$$hole not one of the hangers on..............
The Monster baring his fangs..
“And a Mule!!!?” lol
He’s not smart enough to be the main guy.
Those “hangers on” of D. Barry’s tickle Soros’ elbow.
That’s more forceful language than he ever has used against Chavez, the Iranian Nutjob, or Al Qaeda. Robert Gibbs has even said that not ALL of Taliban is evil and hinted that we will negotiate with them in Afghanistan.
Opponent, Advesary, etc.... Those are terms that should be used. Enemy denotes hate, agression etc.... He is a tool.
Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!
The car is in the ditch and I put my enemies in the back seat. They want to put the radio on country but I control the radio and I want hip-hop.
They want the keys back. But I ain’t gonna gibbum no keys back. I got the keys and my supporters are riding shotgun.
There is a crack in the dashboard of the car caused by 8 years of the Bush administration.
The steering wheel of the car needs a new cover and the windshield wipers need to be fixed...
Half the time, I have no idea what this freakin goofy retard is talking about. I’m sure I’m not the only one.
After 2 years of playtime on the jungle gym, November 3, we finally get some ‘adult supervision back into our government.
STILL not enough to impeach him?!?!?
Really?
REALLY?!?!
I don’t know. Paul calls the Devil himself our Adversary. I think they are all interchangeable terms. As for hate, Christians are supposed to love their enemies, so no necessary inference of hatred there at all for me. I think people grow up in different “connotation pools,” with respect to certain charged words. I’ve seen enemy used in so many varied contexts it would be hard for me to limit it to pure, irrational antagonism. Presidents, however, should never take the position that Americans who want American law enforced are oppositional to him or one of his constituencies. That’s the revealing slip. I think he might well see “enemy” just the way you define it, as mere objects of irrational hated and aggression, and yet he used it of us. If so, it speaks volumes of where his mind is at.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.