Posted on 10/23/2010 4:42:04 AM PDT by rellimpank
Congratulations to the editors at the Washington Post. Seventeen months after the Eric Holder Justice Department dismissed a slam-dunk case against the New Black Panther Party for voter intimidation, the Post gets around to printing a thorough vetting of the dismissal. The story is slated for Saturdays print edition. While other media like Breitbart/The Bigs, Fox News, the Washington Times, the Weekly Standard, Pittsburgh Tribune Review, Investors Business Daily, Pajamas Media, and Drudge have had dozens of stories on the corrupt New Black Panther dismissal, the Washington Post at last is in the game.
The story is a shocker too. The shock comes from the middle of the road and factual nature of the story.
There are small problems with the story. For one, the Washington Post is the only outlet that calls King Samir Shabazz by his old slave name (Shabazzs own words) of Maruse Heath. Even Heath doesnt call himself Heath. Of course this takes some of the sting off Shabazzs rants against Jews and calls to kill cracker babies in their crib.
The Posts decision to change a mans name for him is controversial. It has no place
(Excerpt) Read more at biggovernment.com ...
Yep. Every Shabaz thread needs to have this video posted.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2K0Fo1nonR4
“”Like president Barry Soetoro.
Well, no, not like it at all. Bozo changed his own name, a paper didn’t do it out of hand.””
Anyone remember the name William Jefferson Blythe?
While much of the article was written in a straightforward and factual manner (which clearly makes it a damning indictment of the racists in both career positions and political appointments at Justice), the author repeatedly attempts to bend over backwards by adding in “mitigating circumstances” to try and soften the blow to Holder and Obama.
Why would a Democratic Party house organ, a blatantly biased Socialist agitprop machine that took down a Republican President of the United States, undermine the Justice Department of a sitting DemonRat President? And why did they wait so long to do it?
1. Hillary Clinton and the Clinton mob are taking Obama out. The Clinton mob versus the Chicago mob. THIS IS THE LEFT TAKING OBAMA OUT!!!! So Hillary can run in 2012. OBAMA IS A LOSER.
2. The reason the Post waited until now: Obama is destroying the Democratic Party, perhaps for a generation. His radicalism is so blatant, that it has exposed the true agenda of the DemonRat Party and everday Americans, including Democrat voters are appalled.
They can try - but the financial Powers-That-Be selected the Obama Mob over the Hillary Cartel because they knew Obama and his people loved the trappings of power so much that they would make far more compliant servants of their interests. Events of the last two years have proven them right.
Since July, Wall Street political contributions have gone 55% Republican. They don’t like getting blasted by the Obama Regime. They thought they were partners—but now they are being demonized. The switch to Hillary is on. Goldman will lead the charge—they are a RATS’ NEST.
THE DEMS DO NOT WANT A REPUBLICAN TO BE THE FIRST WOMAN PRESIDENT. You must realize the the Washington Post abandoned journalistic standards decades ago. They do not report news. They are ONLY a political mouthpiece. AGITPROP. Leftist. Corrupt.
This is Hillary’s only chance. In 2016, she will be too old. Obama is a disaster for the DEMS. This is a purge like in the old Soviet Union: TROTSKY DEAD. LENIN IN POWER. Clinton criminality at work.
This story needs to be bumped, and bumped, and bumped, and bumped some more.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.