Posted on 10/21/2010 7:46:39 PM PDT by tlb
WASHINGTON As London recovers from the latest deadly al-Qaida attack that killed at least 50, top U.S. government officials are contemplating what they consider to be an inevitable and much bigger assault on America one likely to kill millions, destroy the economy and fundamentally alter the course of history, reports Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin.
According to captured al-Qaida leaders and documents, the plan is called the "American Hiroshima" and involves the multiple detonation of nuclear weapons already smuggled into the U.S. over the Mexican border with the help of the MS-13 street gang.
Al-Qaida has obtained at least 40 nuclear weapons from the former Soviet Union.
It is designed as a final deadly blow of defeat to the U.S., which is seen by al-Qaida and its allies as "the Great Satan."
But the most disturbing news is that high level U.S. officials now believe at least some of those weapons have been smuggled into the U.S.
According to the author, the news sent Bush "through the roof," prompting him to order his national security team to give nuclear terrorism priority over every other threat to America.
However, it is worth noting that Bush failed to translate this policy into securing the U.S.-Mexico border.
According to Williams' sources, thousands of al-Qaida sleeper agents have now been forward deployed into the U.S. to carry out their individual roles in the coming "American Hiroshima" plan.
Bin Laden's goal, according to the book, is to kill at least 4 million Americans, 2 million of whom must be children.
The future plan, according to captured al-Qaida agents and documents, suggests the attacks will take place simultaneously in major cities throughout the country including New York, Boston, Washington, Las Vegas, Miami, Chicago and Los Angeles.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Well, maybe not so much Chicago.
>>> WND posts factual articles
“If by “factual” you mean “farcical, misleading or false, and tinged with hysteria,” I agree”
I hadn’t noticed.
I thought he was concerned about how Global Warming affects people?
This scenario is plausible, considering how easy it is to get into the U.S.
— one likely to kill millions, destroy the economy and fundamentally alter the course of history,...-—
The Kenyan mu$lim in the WH has been successful in two out of the three...
I wonder what Alex Jones thinks?
Soviet nukes had a rumored "shelf life" of 5-7 years until they needed to be rebuilt. The Rooskies are even sending out nuclear capable ships and aircraft without nukes today. These weapons are incredibly expensive to build and maintain. It's not cases of ammo that you can just store under reasonable conditions and it will all work perfectly 50 years from now.
The Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, 19 years ago. As appealing as the thought of a US future is without leaching by indigo-blue cities, I think this scenario is highly unlikely.
/snicker
JEEZ!! Why not San Francisco — most of us wouldn’t miss it at all.
And just to give you nightmares, comsider what one megaton nuke detonated in the Yellowstone caldera, at it's current active point, would do to the USofA agricultural output for six to ten years. The last time that volcano erupted, ash rained to six inches deep as far East as Nebraska.
You have to use Google to find the original article posted here 5 years ago: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1441044/posts
San Francisco would be spared. Nancy Pelosi is loved by Al Qaeda.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.