Posted on 10/21/2010 1:34:28 PM PDT by Bulldawg Fan
A Family Research Council analysis of publicly available documents—the Pentagon’s own report on sexual assault in the military for Fiscal Year 2009, and published decisions from military courts of appeals over the last decade and a half—have shown that there is already a significant problem of homosexual misconduct in the military. This problem can only become worse if the current law is repealed and homosexuals are openly welcomed (and even granted special protections) within the military, as homosexual activists are demanding. Rates of Homosexual Assault in the Military Are Disproportionately High Homosexual activist groups themselves have admitted that less than three percent of Americans are homosexual or bisexual. FRC has reviewed the “case synopses” of all 1,643 reports of sexual assault reported by the four branches of the military for Fiscal Year 2009 (October 1, 2008 through September 30, 2009). Our startling finding was that over eight percent (8.2%) of all military sexual assault cases were homosexual in nature. This suggests that homosexuals in the military are about three times more likely to commit sexual assaults than heterosexuals are, relative to their numbers.
(Excerpt) Read more at downloads.frc.org ...
I wonder if the assault rate isn’t actually much higher as many men wouldn’t want to report being raped.
Interesting information. Thanks for sharing.
That’s a good point.
I was in the Navy for 16 years and know of two incidents of guys being assaulted by homos. One had his pecker sliced in half and the other I’m not sure...
Serves him right.
I hope you're referring to the faggot, and not the man who was assaulted.
Napoleon was known for his “maneuver sur les derrieres”. But in a different context.
Excuse me. Tell me if I´m out of line. But 16 years? Why not stay for 20 & a pension, or are you still in?
Same disproportion of child sexual assault only worse. 32% are homosexual in nature and yet Sodomites are only 3% of the population. Roughly 10 times more likely to offend children.
ping
They want and need an immoral military if they ever intend to secure permanent power domestically against US citizens. The Christian Boy Scout types who now make up the majority will not en masse fire on US citizens, and around half would turn with force against their commanders if ordered to do so.
Think about the state of the country, the mind of the Marxist, and the hatred of Christianity and the Constitution by gays. In addition to enlisting gays, this will purge the military of many moral Oathkeeper types who will not live in the presence of these people.
I got out to be a dad to my son and a number of other reasons. I had torn both patellan tendons (completely fixable now but not back then) had hypothermia in a freak Korean blizzard, plus heat exhaustion three times. The Soviet state had collapsed, and didn't appear to be reassembling any time soon. My wife didn't want an overseas posting.
The military is not there to give people pensions. The moment you have priorities that keep you from being focused on the mission and the people you are serving with, it is time to leave.
Bookmark.
Wow...I always wondered what the statistics were for that...where did you find them?
I recall the way a gay colleague addressed the issue of disproportionate numbers of gays abusing children. He, and others since then, have passionately replied “Anyone abusing a child is FAR more likely to be heterosexual” You see - he went with raw numbers instead of portion of the population. I’ve seen that done many times. It bothered me more with this guy because he was a child care worker. Sure I know he doesn’t like the ‘rep’ but being a LIAR won’t help his rep.
Just looking at the numbers again - I don’t believe that 3% of the military is gay. Gays are typically lefties who hate the military. I know there are exceptions but it can’t be 3% so what is the real number? Is it less than 1% and therefore disproportionate homosexual attacks occur at approximately 10 times the expected rate?
Kurt Freund, et al., “Heterosexuality, Homosexuality, and Erotic Age Preference,” Journal of Sex Research 26 (February 1989)
But many of the offenders were married so he dismisses them as heterosexual, not bisexual or closeted. Which of course is BS. Freund also says if you’re an adult attracted to the same sex but below a certain age it’s not a sexual orientation. Again, BS.
Obama has created a war within the military. He cares more about promoting homosexuality than protecting the armed forces right to vote.
We were having an interesting discussion last night on just this subject. The colonel and two LTCs were trying to describe the situation re homosexual activity in the military to two very liberal young ladies who were smart but clueless on this issue. Libs, obviously.
During war there is enough stress trying to stay alive and do the right thing. Now, those defending us must worry about being raped by some homosexual? Obama is out to destroy the military.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.