Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Some GOP House Leaders Push Compromise
Fox News ^ | October 19, 2010

Posted on 10/19/2010 12:14:04 AM PDT by RC Clayton

Republicans on the campaign trail are bashing the president and his agenda and some are vowing to shut down Washington if they don't get their way. Behind the scenes, key party members are talking a different game.

A number of House Republicans, including some who are likely to be in the leadership, are pushing a post-election strategy aimed at securing concrete legislation, with the goal of showing they can translate general principles into specific action.

Among the ideas is to bring a series of bills to the floor, as often as once a week, designed to cut spending in some way. Longer term, GOP leaders say they recognize they may have to compromise with Democrats in tackling broader problems.

If they recapture the House, Republicans say they are wary of following the example of the class of 1994, which shut down the government in a standoff with President Bill Clinton. Top Republicans contend that passing legislation, or at least making a good faith effort to do so, will earn them more credibility with voters than refusing to waver from purist principles.

"It's pretty clear the American people expect us to use the existing gridlock to create compromise and advance their agenda," said Rep. Darrell Issa (R., Calif.). "They want us to come together [with the administration] after we agree to disagree." GOP leaders stressed that this depends on the willingness of President Barack Obama to compromise as well. And some say if the post-election atmosphere is especially toxic, such compromises may be difficult.

The approach stands in contrast to the Senate, where Republican nominees including Kentucky's Rand Paul and Nevada's Sharron Angle more clearly represent the anti-establishment instincts of the tea-party movement...

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2010; congress; elections; elections2010; foxnews; gop; obama; republicans; rino; rinos; rinosbegone; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: Kellis91789

Republicans.


21 posted on 10/19/2010 2:58:03 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (counter revolutionary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RC Clayton

Memo to PUBs who are in a compromising mood:
We, the people are fed up with the Communist government being imposed on us. END IT OR WE WILL END YOU.

We, the people are giving you one chance, and one chance only, to restore the Constitution. END IT OR WE WILL END YOU.

We, the people have made our voices known. You heard; but did you listen? You don’t really want to p*ss us off, do you? END IT OR WE WILL END YOU.

We, the people don’t want compromise; we want our freedom. END IT OR WE WILL END YOU.

You have been warned. We can turn on you in a New York minute if you fail.


22 posted on 10/19/2010 3:29:57 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheWriterTX; plangent

A few weeks ago, other FReepers and I had to endure some annoying poster telling us we were being duped by Meet the Press because of something Boehner said on the show. Boehner talked about “compromise” but this slef-satisfied poster was telling US that WE were the ones who didn’t get it.

The next day, Republicans all over were shouting “NO COMPROMISE,” and Boehner had to “reframe” his comments, because other FReepers and I were indeed correct.

I don’t think Boehner’s a bad guy. I just think he’s another D.C. pol who isn’t even aware that he’s behaving like a battered wife.

In my lifetime—today I turn 45—I’ve NEVER seen a genuinely conservative Republican Congressional majority. Again—NEVER. They talked the talk while Reagan was president, sometimes, but even then they had this tone about them, that they envied Reagan’s ability to deal with those little “citizens,” but they weren’t really with him to the core. By that I mean I always had the sense that they would jump ship on Reagan if the polls went a certain way.

I am not a far-right Republican. I’m a conservative, but I acknowledge that in the end this indeed means compromises will end up being made. That’s merely acknowledging reality.

That doesn’t mean compromise is something I would ever think about if it came, for example, to defending this country, individual rights, or abortion. (Why would I compromise on ending the killing of the unborn? So Chris Matthews will love me for five minutes?)

So compromise should be seen as an alternative to total defeat, not something that’s our starting posture. When I read things like Issa’s comments, I see someone who, like John McCain before him, wants to be loved by the media more than the things I find important.

So when people tell me, “No, you have to look at what he’s saying...” I just shut down. Because I’ve been down this path over and over again.

For nearly two years now I have been skeptical of Sarah Palin’s ability to be president. Recently someone whose opinion I deeply respect surprised me by casually revealing he liked Palin. He made me see her from a different angle, so to speak, and when I looked around I realized how very different she is from people like Issa. She isn’t ashamed to have my positions—why can’t the rest of this ridiculous party admit they ARE ashamed, and get the hell out and join the democrats, if that’s what they really believe?

Sorry, Mr. Issa, if your opening play amounts to “I won’t win if you’ll let me break even,” you’re not on my side.


23 posted on 10/19/2010 3:30:53 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room!--Dr. Strangelove)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RC Clayton

If what is being predicted in the Coming election comes to pass, it is not compromise the people want you stupid freakin Morons,they want to STOP the Marxist Takeover of Our country.You Stupid Bastards better get that message or your Power will be shortlived.
We DONT compromise with Communists,if that is your attitude Jerimiah Wright the Second in the White Hut is going to eat your Lunch


24 posted on 10/19/2010 3:45:27 AM PDT by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eva

Better to rant against Issa than actually read the statement.

By now we ought to know that Fox is not to be trusted either. Their headline is designed to mislead.


25 posted on 10/19/2010 4:09:23 AM PDT by Carley (For those who fought for it, freedom has a flavor the protected will never know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RC Clayton

You can NOT compromise with communists.


26 posted on 10/19/2010 4:12:21 AM PDT by riri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC Clayton

You can NOT compromise with communists.


27 posted on 10/19/2010 4:12:22 AM PDT by riri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC Clayton

They try this and they will find themselves challenged by a huge third party.

Neither established party will gain because both will have lost any favor.

Just try it suckers.


28 posted on 10/19/2010 4:31:46 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC Clayton

The GOP handles Obama by presenting bills to Obama that support the will of the people. PRESENT THEM to him even if they know he will veto them.

Do it over and over and make him show his hand.

Don’t give us this compromise BS.


29 posted on 10/19/2010 4:36:03 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

Maybe everyone only donating to conservatives will wake-up these RINO losers. Maybe. Not one penny to the Republican party organizations.


30 posted on 10/19/2010 4:39:37 AM PDT by hal ogen (1st amendment or reeducation camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: hal ogen
They are going to have to get some democrats to get anything done in the senate...that is the best we can do til 2012..but maybe they will see the light ..the few sane democrats that are left after the election.. maybe they will become Clinton democrats...maybe they will get rid of there far left leaders and maybe purge the left..that would be great for the country..If the dems control the senate with there far left leaders we will get no where...except with the budget ...it starts in the house
31 posted on 10/19/2010 4:49:37 AM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Kellis91789
What is to stop a Republican Congress from simply passing small bills one at a time as riders on bills Zero can’t defend vetoing ? Like gutting the EPA as a rider on the bill extending unemployment benefits for one month ? Then adding medical malpractice tort reform as a rider for the next month’s extension ? etc.

Yeah, I like those ideas!!! How about adding a big, across-the-board tax cut to the next increase in the minimum wage?

32 posted on 10/19/2010 4:55:13 AM PDT by NRG1973
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
I’ve been down this path over and over again.

Dittos. Congress, all of Congress, had best remember
the people are awake. No More, Never Again, will I
be fooled by those who refuse to uphold their oaths.

Here is one person more who is with you, Darkwolf377.

33 posted on 10/19/2010 5:32:15 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Please God, Bless and Protect Our Men and Women in Uniform)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

I’m in complete agreement with everything you have said. We’ve compromised this path to hell; I don’t want to cede another inch - I want to regain lost territory.


34 posted on 10/19/2010 5:58:08 AM PDT by TheWriterTX (Buy Ammo Often)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RC Clayton
Related thread:

Palin sends warning to GOP leaders (GOP is 'through' if it doesn't embrace Tea Party message)
35 posted on 10/19/2010 6:18:16 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC Clayton

There is no room for compromise if America is to get out of the current economic hole it’s in.

Can you say slash and burn budget children?

I knew you could...


36 posted on 10/19/2010 6:19:35 AM PDT by TSgt (Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho - 44th and current President of the United States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC Clayton

“key party members are talking a different game”

Ah, the Republicrats. They’re nothing if not consistent.

The Dims take power and conduct a Marxist scorched earth policy.

When the Republicrats take power, they compliantly place their necks on the chopping block.

With friends like the Republicrats, who needs enemies?


37 posted on 10/19/2010 6:24:38 AM PDT by SharpRightTurn (White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
This is the last and final chance for a GOP majority. If we FAIL to do what is being asked of us, then we will never win a majority again...or at least not for 40 years.

We are all asking the winners to CHANGE the status quo of spend spend spend.

If they do NOT, because of COMPROMISE, the GOP "leadership" will be gone forever and there will be a strong rise of a third party.

I don't think the pols today truly understand the precarious situation that exists. Career pols have a "ho-hum" attitude right now and that will end...whether they believe it or not.

This isn't just about the tea party. This is about people being FED UP and unless they are placated and listened to, the folks on this thread are right...we'll throw the next crew out as well...

38 posted on 10/19/2010 6:28:33 AM PDT by Solson (The Voters stole the election! And the establishment wants it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RC Clayton

I don’t want to compromise with them. I want to utterly defeat them. If that means foiling EVERYTHING they want to do and passing NOTHING until we get rid of Obama in 2012 then so be it. These equivocating appeasers still have not, are no capable of, learned a damn thing. No matter how you bend over backwards for a liberal, he’ll still find some way to shove it up your keester. I say club them like baby seals sunning themselves on the ice [legislatively speaking, of course]


39 posted on 10/19/2010 6:30:27 AM PDT by Gaffer ("Profiling: The only profile I need is a chalk outline around their dead ass!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC Clayton
Lemmee guess: McCainiac.
Snowe.
Collins.
Graham.
40 posted on 10/19/2010 6:34:57 AM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson