Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mitch Daniels: Hey, how about a VAT? (And Oil Tax!)
Hot Air ^ | October 15, 2010 | ALLAHPUNDIT

Posted on 10/16/2010 9:33:00 AM PDT by GOPGuide

First the infamous proposed “truce” on social issues, now this. No wonder he’s David Brooks’s candidate of choice.

Alternate headline: “Mitch Daniels continues quixotic bid to disqualify himself from Republican nomination.”

Daniels recited from Kahn’s book: “It would be most useful to redesign the tax system to discourage consumption and encourage savings and investment. One obvious possibility is a value added tax and flat income tax, with the only exception being a lower standard deduction.”

“That might suit our current situation pretty well,” said Daniels, who served as George W. Bush’s Office of Management and Budget director and was a senior adviser in Ronald Reagan’s White House. “It also might fit Bill Simon’s line in the late ‘70s that the nation should have a tax system that looks like someone designed it on purpose.”…

In a brief interview after his speech, Daniels downplayed the significance of his comments. He stressed that he would support a VAT “under only the right circumstances,” reiterating his desire for it to be paired with a flat income tax.

“If you think that the paramount problem for the country is the debt, and we’ll never get on top of it without really robust growth, one of the things you want is a very different, more pro-growth tax system,” Daniels told POLITICO. “And a quarter century ago, (Kahn) was writing about one. That’s all. There are other ways to get at it.”

He also sounded warm to the idea of a tax on imported oil. Let me play devil’s advocate here, knowing full well that tax nerds will jump down my throat in the comments: While Daniels has said before that we might need to raise taxes to eliminate the debt, the “VAT + flat tax” system would be geared mainly towards greater efficiency, not necessarily towards a heavier overall tax burden, right? The reason the VAT makes righties shudder is that it’s typically mentioned by Democrats as a new tax on top of the 25+% income tax brackets that most people currently find themselves in. All Daniels is suggesting, I take it, is replacing the brackets with a single income tax rate of, say, 15% and then dropping, say, a 10% VAT on goods and services, which would in theory make tax collection vastly more efficient while giving taxpayers an extra measure of control in deciding how much tax they pay. Want to reduce your debt to Uncle Sam this year? Simple — under a VAT, you’d just spend less.

snip

Using the VAT to target sugary drinks? Surely our government would never do that. Exit question: Is this actually clever “strategery” on Daniels’s part, as his old boss once famously said? Everyone in the GOP field is trying to throw the hardest “true conservative” fastball to impress the base and yet here he is snapping off curves and sliders to appeal to the rest. Hmmmm.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Indiana
KEYWORDS: 2012; daniels; indiana; mitchdaniels; notmymanmitch; obama; palin; republicans; rinos
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: GOPGuide

Well, Mitch won’t be getting my vote.


21 posted on 10/16/2010 10:15:22 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback (Anyone who says we need illegals to do the jobs Americans won't do has never watched "Dirty Jobs.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: businessprofessor
I am unconditionally opposed to a VAT. I do not care what happens to the income tax.

Add me to the opposers of a VAT. There are people on this forum who are all for it as a replacement of the current income tax, that, of course will never happen, it would be in addition to the income tax.

Their reasoning being, that all would pay, including those who pay no income tax now. They are too simple minded to know that any tax the so called "poor" pay through a VAT would be refunded to them, plus a little extra for their troubles. Remember the E.I.T.C.?

22 posted on 10/16/2010 10:15:56 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (Nobody reads tag lines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
There are people on this forum who are all for it as a replacement of the current income tax

You may be confusing VAT with the NRST, two totally different animals.

23 posted on 10/16/2010 10:18:37 AM PDT by Future Snake Eater ("Get out of the boat and walk on the water with us!”--Sen. Joe Biden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook
I take it that you agree with me that the DemonRATs need to own this catastrophe lock, stock and barrel.

Yes, however I could care less about Dimocrat or Republican, I never have and I never will.

I'm a conservative and vote conservative to keep a clear conscious.

Although I have never voted for a dimocrat for the closest to conservative dimocrat would be Zell Miller IMO and Zell isn't in the market.

24 posted on 10/16/2010 10:24:26 AM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide

Read my lips, Daniels D*ckhead

NO NEW TAXES.


25 posted on 10/16/2010 10:31:16 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide

Mitch Daniels is a jerk!! Last year he came out with the quip that we should move on from the principles of Roanld Reagan. Now he’s talking about a VAT tax. He should stay in Indiana and put the VAT tax where the sun don’t shine.


26 posted on 10/16/2010 10:49:20 AM PDT by kenmcg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide
I think Daniels has done a very good job in Indiana. And he's right that the tax system needs to be redesigned to favor savings & investment.

But the VAT .... yikes. Supposedly it works well in a utopia. But my idea of a utopia doesn't have taxes...

27 posted on 10/16/2010 10:58:42 AM PDT by Crichton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide

Mitch Daniels is another “great white hope” promoted by the “anybody but Sarah” crowd. David Brooks was hyping Mitch last week. Between his statements on “a truce on social issues” and the VAT, his 15 seconds are about up.

The wannabes keep self-destructing and the little lady keeps getting stronger.


28 posted on 10/16/2010 11:04:00 AM PDT by bwc2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide

Daniels is somewhat a nany stater. That said, I do appreciate that he is being honest rather than leaving his real beliefs for you to figure out.

It is easy to spout old cliches about how a conservative would govern, a lot harder to actually come up with solutions and be unafraid to be massively unpopular.

He isn’t my favorite by any means. I will decide that when I see who enters and who has the guts to actually articulate solutions to the Obama mess.

Won’t be easy folks.


29 posted on 10/16/2010 11:12:21 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kenmcg

That’s all we need, another big tax nanny stater Republican, who would produce a gigantic target for the press and Democrats to win elections. Yeah, nominating him would be brilliant.


30 posted on 10/16/2010 11:22:50 AM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide

Actually, I would prefer a national sales tax not a VAT that is designed exclusively to pay for ALL government entitlement programs, social security,medicare,medicaid,welfare,etc.It will be adjusted each year to reflect the annual cost as assessed by the CBOE for those programs that year It is the best way to control government spending because the DEMS will no longer be able to buy votes with entitlements by borrowing money or taxing “the rich”.Just see how many bleeding heart liberals there are out there when there is a direct route from the additional entitlements they want to their pocketbooks through an increased sales tax.


31 posted on 10/16/2010 11:24:53 AM PDT by chuckee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide

Why not have a VAT?

(of course that means the SS and income taxes go away....)


32 posted on 10/16/2010 11:59:36 AM PDT by misterrob (Thug Life....now showing at a White House near you....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide

Another politician cooks his own goose. This time, it is not just well done, but chernobylized to a cinder.

The VAT is nothing more than a gravy train for politicians at our expense. No thanks!

This is a huge problem with the political class of either party. All are sitting around dreaming up schemes to use hard working people as tax cash cows. If it isn’t setting up tax cuts to expire, it is schemes like cap and tax and the VAT.

A Pox on all their houses. I say repeal the 16th Amendment to the Constitution and institute the Fair Tax!


33 posted on 10/16/2010 12:10:57 PM PDT by VRWCRick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide
Mitch has been just fine at the State level...but it's abundantly clear that he would be a complete disaster at the Fed level.

Somebody get the fork..this turkey is done.

34 posted on 10/16/2010 12:13:48 PM PDT by Earthdweller (Harvard won the election again...so what's the problem.......? Embrace a ruler today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: businessprofessor

Agreed. This is insidious. the plan is to redistribute our wealth to the world through the UN.


35 posted on 10/16/2010 12:31:05 PM PDT by SC_Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bwc2221
“Mitch Daniels is another “great white hope” promoted by the “anybody but Sarah” crowd.”

Spot on! I have heard allot of anti Palin people throw out Mitch Daniels and others as the best hopes for 2012. However I know very little about most of them.

I do know one thing however, they are not out trying to beat back the commie bastards in DC. They are mute and unable throw a punch.

I want a fighter and someone who will say what I am thinking.

36 posted on 10/16/2010 12:41:44 PM PDT by mickey finn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide

I have a way to make money for the taxpayers - 99.9 % tax on all politicians salary and 100%tax on all lobbyist money given to politicians. See this will keep the politicians honest. they only live .10% of income. think this will work. I prpose this as an ammendement to the Constitution effectively immediately and back dated to 1789.


37 posted on 10/16/2010 1:30:10 PM PDT by hondact200 ( Lincoln Freed the Enslaved. Obama Enslaves the Free. Obama is Americas Greatest Threat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: businessprofessor
I will never support a VAT. It is the worst possible tax scheme.

Dittos.

38 posted on 10/16/2010 1:40:07 PM PDT by Tribune7 (The Democrat Party is not a political organization but a religious cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

A vat tax will send is into a slave plantation and permanent depression.


39 posted on 10/16/2010 1:42:53 PM PDT by GlockThe Vote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: HapaxLegamenon; GOPGuide; pissant; mkjessup; stephenjohnbanker; calcowgirl
Jim DeMint for Majority Leader!

And Tom McClintock for Speaker of the House!

40 posted on 10/16/2010 2:15:17 PM PDT by rabscuttle385 (Live Free or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson