Skip to comments.
Baby snatched for dad's politics back with parents (Oathkeepers)
World Net Daily ^
| 15 OCT 10
| By Bob Unruh
Posted on 10/15/2010 10:47:03 AM PDT by DCBryan1
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Johnathon Irish, fiancé and baby
1
posted on
10/15/2010 10:47:06 AM PDT
by
DCBryan1
To: DCBryan1
Amazing what a few thousand fire-breathing phone calls and emails to government bureaucrats can accomplish!!!
2
posted on
10/15/2010 10:48:33 AM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
("The only stable state is one in which all men are equal before the law." -- Aristotle)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
While this baby snatching should NEVER have happened, I just pray that technique of expressing our outrage continues to be effective and we don't find it necessary to resort to sterner measures against these overreaching bureauclowns.
3
posted on
10/15/2010 10:52:19 AM PDT
by
Dick Bachert
(The upcoming election is the most important in our lifetimes!!! BE THERE!!!!!!!)
To: DCBryan1
Accusations dropped???? Accusations dropped??
They come by and snatch up a man’s kids because he is accused of belonging to a political organisation??
Things have gone a bit too far in this country.
4
posted on
10/15/2010 10:52:59 AM PDT
by
Venturer
To: DCBryan1
Another example of the ignorance and stupidity of liberalism.....
5
posted on
10/15/2010 10:53:40 AM PDT
by
Kimmers
(Tell a lie often enough it becomes political........)
To: DCBryan1
Man (Oathkeeper)+ woman (fiancee)= baby. Does not compute.
Not by the Book.
6
posted on
10/15/2010 10:53:52 AM PDT
by
Doulos1
(Bitter Clinger Forever)
To: Dick Bachert
I just pray that technique of expressing our outrage continues to be effective and we don't find it necessary to resort to sterner measures against these overreaching bureauclowns. We'll see. I for one am not sanquine about the future.
7
posted on
10/15/2010 10:54:01 AM PDT
by
Lurker
(The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
To: DCBryan1
This is great news, go Oathkeepers! Anyone know if previous allegations that the baby was abused while under DCYF care have proved true?
Many here felt this case was some sort of scam by the parents, glad to see they were wrong.
8
posted on
10/15/2010 10:54:04 AM PDT
by
Teflonic
To: DCBryan1
From what I read earlier in the week, this couple has a history of domestic violence and that was the reason for what happened.
9
posted on
10/15/2010 10:55:25 AM PDT
by
FarRightFanatic
(It wasn't an election. It was a socialist coup.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
that's good however they probably have their sights on the next ‘threat’. It would be better if the people exercised enough power to eliminate these kinds of bureaucratic thugs, put them out of business and jail a few of them.
10
posted on
10/15/2010 10:55:29 AM PDT
by
paul51
(11 September 2001 - Never forget)
To: Doulos1
I’m not sure about your generational background, but as a 30 year old conservative man, I see this sort of thing happening all the time. My fiancee is 6 years my senior, and we’re growing concerned about her biological clock and that “dreaded” 40. If we’re not officially hitched in the next couple of years, I wouldn’t be upset or concerned if we conceived. This woman is everything to me, and she’s the first and only woman I’ve ever considered to be “mommy material.”
While the somewhat anachronistic ways of our past are worth holding on to, I think the idea of a “bastard” child is less frowned upon today as it was 40, 50, 60 years ago.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m going to hold out until marriage, but since we don’t use contraception, we understand that we’re “playing with a loaded gun,” so to say.
11
posted on
10/15/2010 10:58:22 AM PDT
by
rarestia
(It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
To: Venturer
Yes! Turn them back. On 2/11 remember it is your America and kick the bums out.
12
posted on
10/15/2010 10:59:18 AM PDT
by
dusttoyou
(Let the other side get all wee-wee'd up, Remember come November)
To: rarestia
Just go to the courthouse tonight and get married.
Problem solved.
To: Venturer
Heads still need to roll.
14
posted on
10/15/2010 11:02:45 AM PDT
by
WAW
(Which enumerated power?)
To: DCBryan1
This is just a weird story. Last thing I read was the baby had been rushed to the hospital after possible sexual assault while in foster care, now the family suddenly has the baby back.
I’m so confused.
To: DCBryan1
Irish, reached today by telephone by WND, said New Hampshire state law prevents disclosure of details of family court disputes. But the WND source confirmed that the little girl had been returned to the family and there were no future court dates scheduled in the case. Pretty much confirms that the bad guys in this incident were the CPS, cops and the judge.
This means that Mr Irish has been threatened by the court with contempt sanctions if he reveals political corruption and agenda in CPS and the court.
16
posted on
10/15/2010 11:04:47 AM PDT
by
Navy Patriot
(Sarah and the Conservatives will rock your world.)
To: Retired Greyhound
She’s a widow who, in her words, “was sold a bill of goods,” when her late husband rushed her to the courthouse for a wedding.
I’m a traditional man with traditional values, and I believe every woman should have the privilege of a ceremony. I would never deign to a shotgun wedding nor a courthouse ceremony. She’s been through that, she’s my queen, she deserves the royal treatment.
17
posted on
10/15/2010 11:11:31 AM PDT
by
rarestia
(It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
To: DCBryan1
GET OUT AND VOTE!!!!!
18
posted on
10/15/2010 11:12:41 AM PDT
by
Mr. K
(Job #1 of next Congress- DEFUND THE LEFT (#2 repeal obamacare))
To: FarRightFanatic
From what I read earlier in the week, this couple has a history of domestic violence and that was the reason for what happened.Now they are saying it was a case of "mistaken identity"...smells like a government coverup to me. I don't think there ever was any domestic violence - the couple has been saying that was a bogus claim from the start.
19
posted on
10/15/2010 11:15:55 AM PDT
by
Teflonic
To: DCBryan1
Irish doesn’t, on the surface, sound like a typical “Oath Keeper.” As I understand “Oath Keepers” are mostly military folks. Is he one, or just a wannabee.
20
posted on
10/15/2010 11:19:51 AM PDT
by
elpadre
(AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaeda" and its allies.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson