To: Red_Devil 232
Looks like whoever designed it wasn’t really thinking.
the attachment should have been external.
41 posted on
10/12/2010 4:27:24 PM PDT by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: tet68
Could have been NASA -
I agree the cable should have an external attachment.
46 posted on
10/12/2010 4:31:53 PM PDT by
Red_Devil 232
(VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
To: tet68
It pains me to say that MSNBC has pretty good coverage.
48 posted on
10/12/2010 4:33:36 PM PDT by
Raebie
To: tet68
Looks like whoever designed it wasn’t really thinking. the attachment should have been external.
Or at least more accessible ...
51 posted on
10/12/2010 4:34:49 PM PDT by
Tunehead54
(Nothing funny here ;-)
To: tet68
The cable attachment has to be internal so that in case it is trapped by a rock GOING UP the internal catchment can be released allowing the capsule to return to the bottom ~ otherwise it’d just be stuck in the tunnel and they’d need to drill another one.
104 posted on
10/12/2010 5:59:22 PM PDT by
muawiyah
("GIT OUT THE WAY" The Republicans are coming)
To: tet68
Hey there tet; hope you are well.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson