Posted on 10/12/2010 10:32:49 AM PDT by pissant
President Obama would trounce former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin (R) in a hypothetical match-up for the 2012 presidential election, a new poll found Tuesday.
Obama leads Palin, the 2008 GOP vice presidential candidate, by a 16-point margin, the Bloomberg News National Poll found.
Fifty-one percent of likely voters said they would vote to reelect Obama in a hypothetical match-up against Palin, who drew the support of 35 percent of likely voters.
Ten percent said they likely would not vote in an Obama-Palin contest, and 4 percent said they were not sure.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
*If* Zero could best Palin (which he wouldn’t) by 16% he’d utterly embarrass Hunter.
I’ve named them many times, over and over.
Was wondering if their Falcon is the bird or the old, cheaply built Ford compact car that failed?
If and when Hunter joins the race, you will see them AGAIN. None of it mattered to Fredheads last time. I anticipate it won’t matter to the cultists now either.
I’m going to start the BaltimoreOriole Pary.
Our plank will be manned with hitters who can’t hit and pitchers who can’t pitch.
Based on the cult-like belief in the POWER OF PALIN, I have no doubt that if this were 1979 and she was running against Ronald Wilson Reagan he would be labled an “out of touch, Hollyweird, elitist, establishment, RINO” compared to Sarah.
Sarah is PERFECT where she is and doing what she is doing. She supports conservatives, raises tons of money for them, and is bullet-proof to all the attacks launched on her BECAUSE she is not in office. She is free to do and say whatever she wants. She could run with this for years and years. If she ran and lost in 2012 she would lose the voice she has now permanently.
Im going to start the BaltimoreOriole Party.
Our plank will be manned with hitters who cant hit and pitchers who cant pitch.
As to the "gullible freepers", I think he has almost a dozen on his side that he can actually count on to help him from being laughed off of FR. They just make a lot of noise, there never has been many of them.
No way Jose. I supported Reagan back then, and I still believe he is the gold standard. BUT, he was not just a conservative politician. He was exceedingly well read, the undeniable leader of conservative philosophy, as well as the leading anti-communist.
But he’s also dead. So we’ll need to find the best man (or woman) to carry out the Reagan Revolution, Part II. It certainly wasn’t GHWB or GWB. You can support Palin. I’m not trying to tell you not to, or that she’s a terrible choice. But she’s not my cup of tea for the reasons stated earlier.
Forgive me, I’ve read a lot of your posts but they’re all negative, particularly against Palin.
Would it kill you to name them again, here and now?
Also waiting on your answer as to if you think someone who supported No Child Left Behind is a real conservative.
Party motto: "We can't beat anyone"
Falcon Party motto: "We can't even beat the candidate formerly known as unsure"
“As to the “gullible freepers”, I think he has almost a dozen on his side that he can actually count on to help him from being laughed off of FR. They just make a lot of noise, there never has been many of them.”
Actually the terminology for them is...
Falcon Party Phone Bank...of 8-12 of them.
“Since I dont think they should even be able to vote, what makes you think Id want one as CIC”
Your dead serious, aren’t you? Amazing, just jaw dropping unbelievably amazing.
I use the word “hatred” because I have read a number of pissant’s threads and posts.
You’re jumping to conclusions. Judging by your words, you’ve assumed I support Sarah Palin. My post has nothing to do with whether or not I endorse her. It has to do with a post by William and my reply based on what pissant has consistently expressed.
Well, I don’t want you to get the wrong impression. Some recent posts.
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/larrysinclairslover/index?tab=articles
So, in other words, you can't back up your claim with links and quotes. Shouldn't be that hard to do in the age of Google.
So, then, maybe you could answer my question, then - do you consider someone who voted for No Child Left Behind to be a true conservative?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.