To: Red Badger
I’m sure it is 500 or so years old, but, not being an expert or anything, it looks kind of awkward for Michaelangelo. THe composition seems off or something.
16 posted on
10/11/2010 10:47:30 AM PDT by
Cloverfarm
(This too shall pass ...)
To: Cloverfarm
Well be wasn’t laying on his back on a 30 foot scaffolding with it 12 inches from his face when he painted it..............
17 posted on
10/11/2010 10:49:05 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(No, Obama's not the Antichrist. But he does have him in his MY FAVES.............)
To: Cloverfarm
Im sure it is 500 or so years old, but, not being an expert or anything, it looks kind of awkward for Michaelangelo. THe composition seems off or something. Jesus' anatomy is off. Compare the muscles on his abdomen to that of Adam on the ceiling of the Sistene Chapel. It certainly doesn't seem like Michelangelo to me, either.... If you ask me, it looks a lot more Spanish ... something about the Mary's pose, and her eyes.
On the other hand....
![](http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/10/10/article-0-0B8FA296000005DC-983_634x622.jpg)
![](http://www.ynetnews.com/PicServer2/20122005/858834/BEI101_wa.jpg)
23 posted on
10/11/2010 10:58:13 AM PDT by
r9etb
To: Cloverfarm
I agree. The musculature is very primitive.
25 posted on
10/11/2010 11:05:12 AM PDT by
Andyman
(The truth shall make you FReep.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson