Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This'll never happen.

Texas is a very friendly DWI state. We still don't allow DWI checkpoints.

1 posted on 10/09/2010 7:48:40 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: Responsibility2nd
Instead of raising taxes, they'll just arrest every 3rd Texan, and fine them $800....

See, no new taxes!

2 posted on 10/09/2010 7:51:43 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd

Alcohol and beer giants beware the feds are going to come for you next.,.


3 posted on 10/09/2010 7:52:25 PM PDT by Stayfrosty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd
This'll never happen.

Never say never. When I started driving it was perfectly legal to drink alcohol while driving, as long as you weren't drunk. That didn't change until the mid 80's. But change it did.

5 posted on 10/09/2010 7:54:06 PM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd
How much are your reactions really slowed at 0.05% BAC? From what I understand the drop from 0.10 to 0.08 increased the number of arrests, but really didn't have a huge impact on accidents. The bigger cause are the drivers above 0.15% who just don't care that their licenses have been suspended. Down at the lower levels you start counting "alcohol related accidents" where the person is in an accident at above the legal limit, but that didn't necessarily cause the accident.

I'm guessing that the primary consideration is an analysis of the fine revenue rather than road tests of drivers at various BACs.

6 posted on 10/09/2010 7:55:22 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Grblb blabt unt mipt speeb!! Oot piffoo blaboo...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd

.05? You won’t even be able to have dinner and a drink with your wife and drive back home unless you weigh 350 pounds.


7 posted on 10/09/2010 7:55:32 PM PDT by carjic (Laid off since Dec 08...HELP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd

They should raise it, so that they can concentrate on the more dangerous cases.

When I was younger, I didn’t even know that Texas had DWI, except when related to extreme reckless driving.

I kept a bottle of whiskey available, and a country western 8 track in my front seat, if I got pulled over for swerving or driving too slow, I would swig the whiskey to hide my breath and replace the Hendrix tape with country.


8 posted on 10/09/2010 7:55:56 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd
The national standard is 0.08, but Austin's Police Chief Art Acevedo is pushing state lawmakers to allow officers to arrest drivers with a BAC between 0.05 and 0.07. The Chief said too many people are being arrested for DWIs and then plea bargaining for a lesser charge.

And the American Police State creeps forward on stealthy feet.

9 posted on 10/09/2010 7:57:56 PM PDT by kiryandil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd

Utterly ridiculous. All one has to do, is look at the (true) statistics on drunk driver accidents. Your typical accident-causing drunk has a blood alcohol level of OVER .15....nearly twice the legal limit. Most are over .20, where .30 is (usually) dead by alcohol poisoning. Many also, even after causing a serious accident, get a slap on the wrist....when they should absolutely lose their license.

The only reason states have a .08 level to begin with is NOT the real stats on drunk driving accidents, it is due to lobbying at the federal level by MADD...which made federal highway money unavailable to states with over a .08 limit.

The MADD crowd and this Austin Police chief are simply neo-Prohibitionists, nothing else.


11 posted on 10/09/2010 8:01:25 PM PDT by AnalogReigns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd

All the cops would have to do to bag their quota is arrest everyone leaving a nice restaurant. I think the electorate would deep six this travesty pretty quickly.


14 posted on 10/09/2010 8:08:59 PM PDT by Rembrandt (.. AND the donkey you rode in on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd

Texas can set the limit to ZERO & it will still not keep the dangerous drunks off the road. They are obviously too drunk to give a damn.

What it will do though is further depress the restaurant/bar business.


15 posted on 10/09/2010 8:09:31 PM PDT by Mister Da (The mark of a wise man is not what he knows, but what he knows he doesn't know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd

The entire DWI thing is a racket. It’s at .08 because of Clinton, but most states have turned it into a cash cow ruining peoples lives in the process and I’m not defending driving drunk BTW. In Florida it’s turned into a cottage industry.


19 posted on 10/09/2010 8:26:32 PM PDT by WHBates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd

I’d vote for it but, sadly, it won’t pass in Texas.


21 posted on 10/09/2010 8:31:35 PM PDT by bgill (K Parliament- how could a young man born in Kenya who is not even a native American become the POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd

They (government) want more money. It’s as simple as that. These people have never heard of the law of diminishing returns.


23 posted on 10/09/2010 8:37:48 PM PDT by truthguy (Good intentions are not enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd

I have some wishes for law enforcement:

Start serving and protecting

You have turned into unmitigated bullies and asses


24 posted on 10/09/2010 8:40:06 PM PDT by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd

The Austin police chief is not “Texas officers.” It’s the Austin police chief.


25 posted on 10/09/2010 8:40:22 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd

this is probably because of sloppy police work at trial is resulting in dimissials and prosecutors are dealing with piss poor cases.

it is also about generating revenue.


28 posted on 10/09/2010 8:48:48 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd
Free clue to KENS 5, if you had a .08 BAC you'd be dead.

The standard BAC for a drunk driving charge is .08%.

Which is a total scam as it is since .08% is not likely going to make you a less safe driver, merely increase opportunities for state revenue enhancement.

The old .1% standard really didn't make you that unsafe a driver but at least was reasonable cut off in that two beers at dinner wouldn't get you there.

29 posted on 10/09/2010 8:49:43 PM PDT by Tribune7 (The Democrat Party is not a political organization but a religious cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd

.08 is not even close to drunk for most people


32 posted on 10/09/2010 8:53:48 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd

I got an idea:

How about pulling over drivers who exhibit impairment, whether the impairment occurs from drinking, drugs, texting, doing your makeup, reading a book, yakking with your friends on the phone, etc etc etc.

Oh I know it would never happen - it would require actual work. Zero tolerance and checkpoints are much easier.


34 posted on 10/09/2010 9:06:30 PM PDT by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd
""In 2009, 1,235 people died and 17,833 were injured in drunk driving crashes on Texas roadways."

Yeah, I read about that in the papers almost every day;
funny thing though: most of the drunks are also illegals...

Seems one law doesn't mean any more to them than another.

38 posted on 10/09/2010 9:43:38 PM PDT by Redbob (W.W.J.B.D.: "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson