Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nobody Wants to Say That Sarah Palin Is Qualified to Be President
NY Mag ^ | 10/9/10 | staff

Posted on 10/09/2010 9:18:45 AM PDT by pissant

Sarah Palin sure has some fair-weather friends. In Alaska, when Joe Miller was still a nobody, Palin's endorsement put him on the map and pushed him to a primary victory over incumbent senator Lisa Murkowski. Now it's the general election, and Miller has to appeal to a broader audience than the GOP diehards who vote in primaries. So when he was asked point-blank this week whether Palin is qualified to be president, he merely acknowledged that she's constitutionally eligible.

In Delaware, Palin endorsed Christine O'Donnell five days before her primary bid against well-respected Mike Castle, who was widely seen as the favorite to win. But now O'Donnell needs to steal moderates away from Democrat Chris Coons to have any chance at another upset in November. So when O'Donnell was asked on CNN last night whether Palin is qualified to be president, she replied, "Is she running for president? Again, hypothetical."

(Excerpt) Read more at nymag.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: congress; nymag; obama; palin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last
To: pissant
One problem is that true conservatives seem to be concerned about real qualifications to be President of the United States--meaning, perhaps, among others, that the potential candidate:

1. understands and is committed to the principles underlying America's Constitutional protections for liberty;

2. has real-world executive experience in some area of expertise;

3. is a person of character and ability to motivate and encourage the best instincts of fellow citizens toward individual liberty and independence.

4. is a person whose record of development and achievement can be examined by all citizens.

Clearly, by the nomination and election of the current president, the Democrats do not measure their potential candidates by a similar set of standards.

The question is: whose "qualifications" is the author examining.

Thomas Jefferson, one of our truly great Presidents, wished that citizens examine his record in order to form their opinions of him, rather than the praise or criticism of the press. A candidate who aspires to be President might follow Jefferson's example.

"At a very early period of my life, I determined never to put a sentence into any newspaper. I have religiously adhered to the resolution through my life, and have great reason to be contented with it. Were I to undertake to answer the calumnies of the newspapers, it would be more than all my own time and that of twenty aids could effect. For while I should be answering one, twenty new ones would be invented. I have thought it better to trust to the justice of my countrymen, that they would judge me by what they see of my conduct on the stage where they have placed me, and what they knew of me before the epoch since which a particular party has supposed it might answer some view of theirs to vilify me in the public eye. Some, I know, will not reflect how apocryphal is the testimony of enemies so palpably betraying the views with which they give it. But this is an injury to which duty requires every one to submit whom the public think proper to call into its councils." --Thomas Jefferson to Samuel Smith, 1798. ME 10:58

21 posted on 10/09/2010 9:40:31 AM PDT by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

“Personally, I think that Sarah is a political genuis who is going to bring a tsunami of change. Those who under-estimate this incredibly charismatic and plain-spoken, intelligent woman do it at their peril!!!!!!”

I couldn’t have said it better myself. Oh, I just did.


22 posted on 10/09/2010 9:40:50 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts ma'am, just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Cacique
If one reviews the worst leaders in US history - one finds that the worst errors are made by those with the most foreign policy experience. And conversely those with the least experience ( most Presidents did not) have done fairly well. Generally, foreign policy experience makes no difference one way or the other. Especially not in a post cold war world. BTW-- we need a president to rein in the real power in foreign policy -- the bureacrazis in Washington-NY.

It's not experience that counts the most but demeanor and ability to learn...a savvy nature and a streak of stubbornness and independence.

Sarah has got these qualities in spades.

23 posted on 10/09/2010 9:41:11 AM PDT by eleni121 (http://www.serfes.org/orthodox/memoryof.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ancient Drive

Just a question: you say the msm doesn’t care (about Sarah running for president?) but it seems to me that they are absolutely OBSESSED with it. When I tune into MSNBC on occasion (after taking an antacid) that’s all they ever talk about. Maybe I misunderstood you, lol.


24 posted on 10/09/2010 9:41:49 AM PDT by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I honestly wonder if you’re not in the employ of mitt’ns, the huckster or some other member of the RINO Neorevolutionary Cadre or simply RNC.


25 posted on 10/09/2010 9:42:42 AM PDT by Dr.Zoidberg (Warning: Sarcasm/humor is always engaged. Failure to recognize this may lead to misunderstandings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I will! Sarah Palin is more than qualified to be President!


26 posted on 10/09/2010 9:42:52 AM PDT by tallyhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
I'll prefer her over the Non-President we have had foisted on us......but....

I'll prefer Haley or Bobby over her anytime.

27 posted on 10/09/2010 9:43:25 AM PDT by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Who do you think brought us Obamacare, numerous “stimulous” plans, open borders and a 25% (true) unemployment rate?

A whole bunch of “Highly Qualified” politicans, that’s who.


28 posted on 10/09/2010 9:43:40 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I’ll worry about it when the primaries get going.


29 posted on 10/09/2010 9:45:37 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I guess I am swimming upstream here at FR, but Sarah Palin is not really a POTUS candidate to me.

But the point of the article, seems to be is she qualified for POTUS? I used to be very well read on the Constitution etc., but not so much right now but as far as I can recall she is qualified to be POTUS, esp more so than Obama has demonstrated himself to be or he would not have to hide so much about himself.


30 posted on 10/09/2010 9:45:50 AM PDT by valkyry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: faucetman

She absolutely mesmerizes me. I’m in the theatre and have a very good eye for star quality. Although I will get beaten up for this, I will go so far as to say she has qualities that remind me of the best of Diana, the Princess of Wales (I said the BEST, not the worst!) Her charisma is that strong.

She’s also - unlike the poor Diana - extremely wise and mature.


31 posted on 10/09/2010 9:46:14 AM PDT by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: pissant

No one wants to say Obama isn’t.


32 posted on 10/09/2010 9:46:50 AM PDT by getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL (****************************Stop Continental Drift**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

Indeed her logic drives the socialists nuts the only thing they can do is call her names and have no answers about the issues.


33 posted on 10/09/2010 9:47:46 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Is Sarah Palin Qualified to Be President?

What Miller and O'Donnell should have said:

Yes she's qualified enough where I would consider her as a canidate.

One can say all those things accurately without endorsing her or any candidate at this point in time.

If either Miller or O'Donnell can't say those things, then they fall short of what I thought they were.

Seriously.

34 posted on 10/09/2010 9:48:53 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Certainly more so than our current president.


35 posted on 10/09/2010 9:49:23 AM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Who is more qualified than Sarah to be president?
36 posted on 10/09/2010 9:51:36 AM PDT by Walts Ice Pick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
It was a little strange that Miller and O'Donnell took a pass.

It is strange...on their part, and it is worth pointing out.

It's something numerous RINOs have done.

37 posted on 10/09/2010 9:51:57 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
It's a little strange that you are so mired in enmity, and cannot see the forest! It is a little strange that you post only negative items on Palin... and crave the attention that it brings to you. That can be cured with proper help, specifically shock therapy. You are nothing but a VERY COMMON troll! In the meantime, you shore up our support behind her. Thanks, but no thanks for the negativity...

BTW, I found your likenesst!


38 posted on 10/09/2010 9:54:03 AM PDT by WVKayaker (Faith is putting all your eggs in God's basket, then counting your blessings before they hatch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

She’s qualified. And never mind Teh Awesome in the White House, I’m trying to understand how somebody can look at her and the prospective Republican/conservative field and say they’re qualified and she’s not. They’re fine candidates, most of them, but that much better than her? I’m sorry, I don’t see it.


39 posted on 10/09/2010 10:04:23 AM PDT by RichInOC (Palin 2012: Real And Spectacular....Richard Frank DeCamp, 11/13/34-9/15/10, R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

All Miller and O’Donnell had to do was answer: “Political candidates and the media elite don’t decide who is ‘eligible’. That’s the judgment call of the American people.”

And apparently 48% of the electorate were comfortable with her being Vice President in 2008. I wager that has increased quite a bit since then.


40 posted on 10/09/2010 10:06:08 AM PDT by LostInBayport (When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson