1 posted on
10/07/2010 4:09:10 AM PDT by
tobyhill
To: tobyhill
2 posted on
10/07/2010 4:13:39 AM PDT by
LibLieSlayer
(WOLVERINES!)
To: tobyhill
3 posted on
10/07/2010 4:14:19 AM PDT by
TSgt
(Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho - 44th and current President of the United States)
To: tobyhill
5 posted on
10/07/2010 4:17:58 AM PDT by
BunnySlippers
(I love BULL MARKETS . . .)
To: tobyhill
Obamas base is McDonalds employees.
6 posted on
10/07/2010 4:19:20 AM PDT by
albie
To: tobyhill
So, the bill allows the President to pick and choose who must comply with the new regulations and who is allowed to be exempt.
I wonder if we will see big campaign contributions from McDonalds in the near future?
7 posted on
10/07/2010 4:20:20 AM PDT by
Erik Latranyi
(Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
To: tobyhill
Since they have allowed these wavers, they will have to take out the of the HealthCare legislation the fines that the government will impose on people for failing to get the Healthcare plan.... can't grant wavers to some, and then, fine others.
To: tobyhill
...blackmail as simply as possible. Contribute to the socialist agenda or die.
10 posted on
10/07/2010 4:22:28 AM PDT by
Doogle
(IT'S THAT TIME AGAIN....PLEASE donate, because it's the RIGHT thing to do)
To: tobyhill
Rule of a dictator, this is NOT Rule of Law.
12 posted on
10/07/2010 4:27:15 AM PDT by
bvw
To: tobyhill
The waivers issued so far include the policies offered by McDonalds to its fast-food workers, typically capped at just a few thousand dollars, sold by a profit-making company owned by Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans.Imagine! An insurance company trying to make a profit! What nerve. Good catch, NYT!
15 posted on
10/07/2010 4:32:20 AM PDT by
Right Wing Assault
(The Obama magic is <strike>fading</strike>gone.)
To: tobyhill
UnConstitional = Equal Protection Clause - Another series of legal suits will follow in the courts. The new name is ObummerCare - Change in Healthcare Delivery Means Rationing
17 posted on
10/07/2010 4:33:46 AM PDT by
hondact200
( Lincoln Freed the Enslaved. Obama Enslaves the Free. Obama is Americas Greatest Threat)
To: tobyhill
This behavior is NOT DEFENSIBLE in a court of LAW.
Where the f is equal protection?
Obamacare will be ruled null, void, and UNCONSTITUTIONAL
The quicker the better
18 posted on
10/07/2010 4:35:40 AM PDT by
wetgundog
(" Extremism in the Defense of Liberty is no Vice")
To: tobyhill
The payoffs to the DNC were adequate.
19 posted on
10/07/2010 4:38:31 AM PDT by
Diogenesis
('Freedom is the light of all sentient beings.' - Optimus Prime)
To: tobyhill
I don’t know if it’s possible to be shocked anymore.
How does the Exective Branch get this type of arbitrary power?
24 posted on
10/07/2010 5:33:01 AM PDT by
Incorrigible
(If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
To: tobyhill
And for the umpteenth time, Democrat reveals his contempt and loathing for Equal Protection under the law.
26 posted on
10/07/2010 5:36:31 AM PDT by
Hoodat
( .For the weapons of our warfare are mighty in God for pulling down strongholds.)
To: tobyhill
ah the benevolent dictator
only those who I say have to follow the law have to follow the law
29 posted on
10/07/2010 5:43:16 AM PDT by
yldstrk
(My heros have always been cowboys)
To: tobyhill
This was a move by Obama and the HHS to avoid the bad press of having hundreds of thousands of low wage workers losing what little bit of coverage they had. Plain and simple.
They were hell bent on close to 2 million people having their coverage legislated out of existence. It’s only the fact that McDonald’s threw their weight around and was going to cause a stink to save their 30,000 part-time and hourly employee’s coverage that HHS backed off.
Sitting in the wings we’re about million and a half more part-time, low wage, and temporary workers in the same boat. HHS was hoping to get away with this, but McDonald’s called them out on it.
31 posted on
10/07/2010 5:59:43 AM PDT by
lovecraft
(Specialization is for insects.)
To: tobyhill
A nation of tiny, self-serving man-children, not of laws.
32 posted on
10/07/2010 6:15:15 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
("The only stable state is one in which all men are equal before the law." -- Aristotle)
To: tobyhill
Selective laws are a violation of the Constitution and the Equal Protection clause. They are also a strong invitation to bribery and other forms of corruption.
33 posted on
10/07/2010 6:24:11 AM PDT by
expatpat
To: tobyhill
The “waivers” to the law give the law an air of legitimacy in the first place. I strongly object to that and condemn all the idiot lawyers who had anything to do with helping companies obtain the “waivers” instead of questioning the legitimacy of the law.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson