Posted on 10/05/2010 12:14:16 PM PDT by pinochet
This post is inspired by the tragic death of an 18 year old Rutgers University student, who committed suicide after his room mate secretly filmed him having sex with another man. Apparently, the student was so humiliated, that he felt he could not go on living. It is not known if the young man's family was aware of his sexual behavior. A link to the story: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-20018574-504083.html
I do not support the liberal gay agenda. But heterosexual men need to start talking openly about difficult issues, which they never talk about with other men. There is no denying that heterosexual men are more insecure about their sexual orientation, than heterosexual women. If women notice that a certain woman happens to be beautiful, they have no problem talking about that woman's beauty. When women notice the beauty of other women, they talk about it openly, without having any concerns that someone will question their sexual orientation.
Men are of course open in admiring the beauty of women. But when a man notices that another man is very good-looking, he will not mention it openly, out of fear that other men will question his sexual orientation. It is hard for some men to openly state that a few men are better looking than many women, even if there is no sexual attraction involved.
That male macho culture, may have contributed to the climate that led the young man to take his own life. I think it is possible for heterosexual men to get in touch with their feminine side, without endorsing the liberal gay agenda.
There is no guarantee that the young man from Rutgers University would have remained gay for the rest of his life, if he had lived. In Britain, Oscar Wilde's teenage boyfriend, Alfred Douglas, married a woman later in life, and became a pro-family conservative Catholic in the 1920s. One of Britain's brightest pro-family conservative politicians in the early 1990s, Michael Portillo, was revealed to have had a gay relationship in college. In the 1990s, Portillo was the British Defence Secretary and was happily married to a woman, and he was in line to succeed John Major as Prime Minister. But gay militants in Britain used the revelations of his college sex life, to destroy his career.
NO -no more than men are capable of becoming unicorns. Both are mythical creatures.
Are all men heterosexual -YES -are they capable of engaging in homosexual sex? Yes, and some will glue a horn on their heads and call themselves unicorns... Just because they say they are unicorns does not deny the reality that they are heterosexual men...
Yes. Immediately. It's the only way to be sure.
I don’t believe this story about his roommate “filming” his encounter with another man. The needed lights would have been annoying. Also, they would have heard the camera running. And film nowadays is outrageously expensive, and I don’t think you can even get Kodachrome or other direct-positive types of film anymore.
Studies have shown (duh) that children do best and need a mother and a father. Sometimes a parent dies and that actually harms a child a lot less than single parenthood. Also being raised by homosexuals makes children much more prone to all manner of dysfunction including being homosexual, promiscuous, drugs, alcohol, etc.
Which is probably why they want to do away with DADT.
Boys who are sexually insecure with girls and who are latched onto by manipulative pervs are at risk. They have the sexual manipulation of boys down to a science. That is why we did not permit pervs to have access to chlidren.
You must not have to clean it up.
While I may notice a man is handsome, or even "pretty", like Shepherd Smith on Fox News, I simply never find them "attractive".
A woman's attractiveness is magnetic to me.
But men ? Imagining kissing a man is about as repulsive a thought as I can come up with.
So no, they are not "attractive", no matter how handsome or "pretty".
Yes, I do. That’s why I have been working on my aim. I understand there are men who “sit” because of pressure from their g/f, and there’s a name for that.
Girls look nice, smell nice and feel even nicer. I think I figured that out some time around 1st grade or so.
Another fact the MSM refuses to divulge is that there are large numbers of former homosexuals, both men and women.
No one is born “gay”. People can change.
On one thread someone posted that the other man was “older”.
Of course all info has been scrubbed; it ruins the myth that he was “outed” and committed suicide because of it.
A cultural judgment, not an inherent fact. One I happen to agree with, BTW, but then I'm part of this culture.
Just finished a book on ancient Greek culture. During the height of their culture, not the declining Hellenistic period, artistic impressions of adolescent boys in settings where they were obviously intended to represent an esthetic ideal outnumber those of young women by about 25:1. About the same proportion (reversed) in which young women show up on today's magazine covers.
Quite obviously the ancient Greeks thought the young male form far more esthetically pleasing than that of the young female. And they've been considered ever since to be darn good judges of beauty.
I really don't know why I never got a Nobel Prize for all that effort! People have won them for far less!
Which book did you read? I’m about half-way through “Gates of Fire”, Pressman’s novel about the Battle of Thermopylae.
For what its worth, lots of Ancient Greeks were also at least a little gay.
SnakeDoc
If you could have seen the way he squared up and walked into that armory your eyes would have been as watery as mine were. He stands straight and proud!
He was never one to mince words.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.