Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/01/2010 3:28:41 PM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]



2 posted on 10/01/2010 3:29:12 PM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Site requires a password.


3 posted on 10/01/2010 3:32:41 PM PDT by RobRoy (The US Today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

The site with the “letter” is now password protected.


4 posted on 10/01/2010 3:32:44 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
It should be called "Gloria Allred Jumps the Shark." There is nothing in that letter indicative of any illegal or potentially illegal status. Furthermore, the recipient of the letter is instructed that taking any adverse action against the employee based on the letter can result in prosecution under state and federal laws. The most the employer can do is ask the employee to verify the SS number. He cannot even ask to see the SS card. This letter is from 2002. A few questions follow:
1. What was Nicky doing holding onto this thing for 7 years until the time she confessed her illegal status to her employers, resulting in her becoming unemployed?

2. What happened to other letters sent during the 7 years?

3. Who got the mail during the intervening 7 years?

4. How could Gloria maintain with a straight face (well, it may be possible with botox) that a letter that states it makes no implications of the employee's immigration status is incontrovertible proof that Meg and husband knew of Nicky's illegal status before 2009 and lied about it?

7 posted on 10/01/2010 3:39:43 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Just when you think the smearing, lying liberal scum couldn’t stoop any lower.


8 posted on 10/01/2010 3:41:29 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Plenty of idiots leaving comments there. They seem to think Megs guilty for having been conned and they won’t take any other interpretation of the story. San Francisco,land of morons. I cannot wait till the next congress is in and they come begging for another handout next year. When the answer is NO is when we will find out just how committed these libs are to the cause of illegal immigrants.


16 posted on 10/01/2010 3:56:46 PM PDT by wiggen (The teacher card. When the racism card just won't work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Just how stupid does Allred think people are? I can read for myself, and this language:

“Any employer that uses the information in this letter to justify taking action against an employee may violate state or federal law and be subject to legal consequences”

Tells me, in no uncertain terms, that Whitman had no choice but to keep the woman employed - because if she hadn’t that letter would have been exhibit #1 in an employment discrimination suit - until and unless she had other, objective evidence that the woman was an illegal.

More likely than not, what happened was this: Whitman or one of her staffers asked the woman if there was a problem with her SSN, and probably got back a song and dance about how she changed her name and the change wasn’t matched to her SSN properly, or there was a typo, or some other stupid, but non-disprovable, excuse.


17 posted on 10/01/2010 3:57:14 PM PDT by Oceander (The phrase "good enough for government work" is not meant as a compliment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

It`s all over for Whitman. I saw a video of her housekeeper crying crocodile tears and complaining about how bad she had it and how Whitman was a racist. I think she was paid 25/30 thousand a year? Yup, thats having it tough! And she spits in Whitmans face. What a racist hag she is.


33 posted on 10/01/2010 4:40:18 PM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
Meg should immediately sue Allred. Got this bitc@ and now is the time to finish her off.
38 posted on 10/01/2010 5:04:44 PM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Alrad says that she is representing Nicki in a complaint thatt she didn’t get auto mileage, and unpaid hours. Another attorney has been hired to represent her immigration status.

So, this scum sucking attorney files a complaint for a few extra dollars for her client, while exposing her client as a Social Security fraud; an illegal alien subject to deportation, jail, significant fines??

Yeah that makes alot of sense!

If Whitman can get her message out to all the beautiful people of Kalifornia, that should expose the RATS for what they are!


40 posted on 10/01/2010 5:07:53 PM PDT by Noob1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

I just heard a soundbite of an exchange Allred had with Mark Levin, and the wheels should be turning for her disbarment and the surrender of her legal license. She a bald faced liar and her conduct violates those of any profession.


53 posted on 10/01/2010 6:28:03 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Well ok, to me this looks like, I didn’t know anything about it, is not true. They knew something was wrong.

They did pay good wages but trusted someone else to make sure she was legal. If I lived in CA and I was going to hire someone, I think I would do that check myself. It is easy enough to check if a SSN matches a name. And our whole country has just become so corrupt. Look, CA wants illegals. They don’t want to use e-verify which takes about 30 seconds. So where are all these people supposed to be working anyway?

So I ask you,

If you are a relative of someone who is illegal, are you mad at Meg Whitman for giving her a job?

And if you are not illegal or a relative of someone who is illegal, are you mad at Meg Whitman because she employed someone who was illegal or lied about it?

What would make me mad, is someone lying about it. But I would think hiring illegals would make hispanics very happy, if that’s who you’re pandering to.

So now we have someone who has entered our country illegally, worked here, and commited social security fraud. Is she going to be deported? No, of course not. So what’’s the big taboo of hiring illegals for politicians all about? bullcrap, of course.

If CA wants to be a sanctuary state, then stop crucifying people for hiring them. And don’t freakin lie about it either!! If you want to break federal law and be all high and mighty about it, then do the e-verify check yourself.

geeeez


57 posted on 10/01/2010 6:42:23 PM PDT by jdirt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

I thought the reason folks hired illegal aliens was that they didn’t have to pay decent wages or social security for them?

That alone proves that they thought she was legal.


66 posted on 10/01/2010 10:46:07 PM PDT by LadyDoc (liberals only love politically correct poor people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
Apologies to Steely Dan.

Nicky don't lose that letter
It's the only proof you got
You might need it if you sue Whitman Unless Allred screws that up

68 posted on 10/01/2010 11:07:05 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (My Rights are God given, not Obama approved...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson