Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Health Plans Face Scrutiny Amid McDonald's Move
The Wall Street Journal ^ | 09-30-10 | JANET ADAMY

Posted on 09/30/2010 4:51:18 PM PDT by GOP_Lady

The Obama administration said Thursday that its top health official will "exercise her discretion" in enforcing a new health-law requirement, a move that could prevent McDonald's Corp. and other employers from disrupting their health-care policies for hourly workers.

The announcement Thursday followed a report in The Wall Street Journal that McDonald's warned federal regulators it could drop its health-insurance plan for nearly 30,000 restaurant workers unless regulators waive a new requirement of the health overhaul. The requirement, known as the minimum medical loss ratio, concerns the percentage of revenue received from premiums that must be spent on benefits.

McDonald's is among the retailers and restaurant chains that offer a "mini-med" limited benefit. Most of these plans don't meet a 2011 requirement that they spend 80% to 85% of premiums on medical benefits instead of overhead expenses.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: health; healthcare; obambacare; wsj
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
Earlier:  McDonald's May Drop Health Plan
1 posted on 09/30/2010 4:51:23 PM PDT by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 506Lake; AdvisorB; afraidfortherepublic; antivenom; angry elephant; Bernard; Blonde; ...


To be added or removed from the
"The Wall Street Journal" Ping List,
FReepmail
GOP_Lady.

2 posted on 09/30/2010 4:52:00 PM PDT by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

“The Obama administration said Thursday that its top health official will “exercise her discretion” in enforcing a new health-law requirement, a move that could prevent McDonald’s Corp. and other employers from disrupting their health-care policies for hourly workers.”

Translation: calling in the thugs to threaten McDonald’s to STFU.


3 posted on 09/30/2010 4:55:14 PM PDT by Spok (Free Range Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady
If they're just going to waive compliance with the law doesn't that show they shouldn't have passed the stupid bill in the first place? Sheesh.
4 posted on 09/30/2010 4:56:18 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

Arbitrary uses of authority, pretty much what we expected.


5 posted on 09/30/2010 4:57:17 PM PDT by ArmstedFragg (hoaxy dopey changey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

Hmmm. Interesting. Wonder if it could be discretionized effectively out of existence with the right Congress.


6 posted on 09/30/2010 4:57:39 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

“McDonalds May Cut Healthcare for 30,000 Workers”

“Obama Administration Takes Steps to Save Healthcare for 30,000 McDonalds Workers”

“McDonalds Lays Off 30,000 Workers”

“Obama Administration Takes Steps to Save Job of 30,000 McDonalds Workers”

“McDonalds Announces Closing of 600 Restaurants, 45,000 Jobs Lost”

“Obama Administration Takes Steps to Prevent Closing of McDonalds Restaurants”

“McDonalds Declares Bankruptcy in the United States, Moves International Operations to Japan”

“Burger King may cut Healthcare for 20,000 Workers”


7 posted on 09/30/2010 4:57:59 PM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

“top health official will ‘exercise her discretion’”

In other words Barry, Jarrett and Axelrod have devised another tool to blackmail major corporations. If McDonalds makes a generous donation to the DNC then the “top health official” will make an exception for them to maintain their current health plan. If no payments are forthcoming the Administration will destroy your business.


8 posted on 09/30/2010 5:00:17 PM PDT by purplelobster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spok

I was thinking along the lines of colorado tanker when I read this, and it wasn’t making sense. Your scenario is definitely the correct one!


9 posted on 09/30/2010 5:00:22 PM PDT by Siouxz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ArmstedFragg

In this example “discretion’ means a Government gun.


10 posted on 09/30/2010 5:00:28 PM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

Secretary Kathleen Sebelius will be able to allow certain waivers to the requirement, but that it was too early to confirm they will. She must wait for guidance from state insurance commissioners, and the administration doesn’t expect to release the agency’s final guidance until December. The agency said the law gives Ms. Sebelius discretion to apply the requirement.

“Secretary Kathleen Sebelius will be able to allow certain waivers to the requirement, but”

Yep, that creates a level playing field for the rest of restaurant industry. Way too much power in one person’s hands.


11 posted on 09/30/2010 5:01:22 PM PDT by steveab (When was the last time someone tried to sell you a CO2 induced climate control system for your home?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking
Wonder if it could be discretionized effectively out of existence with the right Congress.

Or with the right Administration. The new Health Care Commissioner has almost unlimited authority. Under a Republican president it means that things could change quite a bit.

12 posted on 09/30/2010 5:01:55 PM PDT by Gideon7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ArmstedFragg

And I’m quite sure all these little problems will go away once McDonalds agrees to implement a new, healthier menu more in line with the vision of our Dear Leader and his Sainted Wife.


13 posted on 09/30/2010 5:02:44 PM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gideon7

Exactly. I realized it was under the authority primarily of the administration, but Congress is going to change hands first, so I was thinking there might be stuff they could do, like refusing to fund enforcement efforts and so on.


14 posted on 09/30/2010 5:05:42 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
If they're just going to waive compliance with the law doesn't that show they shouldn't have passed the stupid bill in the first place? Sheesh.

Nonsense. If the law was clear and everyone had to obey it equally, there would be no opportunities to slip your money to their cronies, punish their enemies, and solicit political baksheesh.

15 posted on 09/30/2010 5:08:28 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady
Rush was all over this one today...

I loathe the POS CongressRats we have in power right now. And that goes for The One and his useless, angry, bitter, soulless wife as well...

16 posted on 09/30/2010 5:09:57 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save the Earth. It's the only planet with Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

Yes, I think you appear qualified for a "waiver."

17 posted on 09/30/2010 5:31:45 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

BINGO!

it is going to become an influence based ecconomy not a success ecconomy.


18 posted on 09/30/2010 5:34:37 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Spok

Many years ago in GM, a hilarious spoof article was passed around about GM buying a fast food chain and having the UAW organize the work staff. Of course quickly resulting in a total business collapse.

I need to scan my copy and post it up some time.
It was titled “GM Burgers”


19 posted on 09/30/2010 5:36:40 PM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: purplelobster

“In other words Barry, Jarrett and Axelrod have devised another tool to blackmail major corporations”

The Chicago way I guess...


20 posted on 09/30/2010 6:08:59 PM PDT by MichaelCorleone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson