Posted on 09/29/2010 6:23:07 PM PDT by Iam1ru1-2
Of course, we'd all love to have access to an insider, but is this on the level?
Narcisstic “Teleprompter-In-Chief” ping.
At least the captain knew how to drive a ship. That's more than this guy knows.
Maybe 0bama could be interested in becoming UN Secretary. Don’t know how much campaigning would be involved, though...
Wow!
Didn’t part three of this interview predict (as proofthey are a real insider) that a prominent dem will speak out about this about Obama before the 2012 elections?
Right on!
LLS
I smell Hillary entering center stage fake moderate right.
Why does this “insider” think Obama could beat Palin by twenty points in 2012? The polls don’t show that and Obama has never been in a tough election.
According to a few MSM reports he would beat her by 16 points
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20019359-503544.html
We've known and chatted about obummer’s ego-maniacal tendencies here for quite some time. This is confirmation.
Dole and McCain combined didn’t lose by that much. The last time a Republican was wiped out came in 1964.
The worst Palin would lose by is the margin Dole got beat with in 1996, 8-9 points. But I guarantee she will fight a whole lot harder.
Obama couldn’t beat a street light by twenty points.
“I mean, we were all led to believe that this guy was some kind of intellectual giant, right? Ivy League and all that. Well, that is not what I saw. Barack Obama doesnt have a whole lot of intellectual curiosity.”
Hmmmmmmmmmm...who led us to believe that about him? And what did those same propagandists say about W. Bush?
Or so they told each other.
He was half black. Period.
That's all that mattered to the idiots.
“Obama was not ready. He had never lost a campaign. Everything was handed to him.”
This is NEVER a good way to ‘succeed’ and I would argue that it’s not really success at all - 11/4/2008 notwithstanding. Rooking 30 to 40% of the American public to vote for you when you’ve done nothing - is that success? Even in politics like barry is used to destroying your opponents and defining that as success is WEAK. Having good, innovative ideas and sticking to them - now that’s leadership and doing that would be successful. Sorry barry, you’re in the wrong business and you’re definitely in the wrong part for that kind of success. May want to try some mid-level management job - or better yet, some line job where your work actually is measured and matters.
She must be a self loather then. ;)
“The polls dont show that and Obama has never been in a tough election.”
Hillary charged at him pretty hard in the RAT primary - but she was playing catch up football against the ‘annointed one.’
Obama was merely a “vessel” to get a cabal of left-wing ideologues into the White House.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.