Skip to comments.
U.S. Wants Broader Internet Wiretap Authority
FOX NEWS ^
| 09/27/10
| FOXNEWS
Posted on 09/27/2010 6:48:53 AM PDT by Doogle
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
....not what the lying clown said back in 2008.....
http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9845595-7.html
1
posted on
09/27/2010 6:48:55 AM PDT
by
Doogle
To: Doogle
2
posted on
09/27/2010 6:50:32 AM PDT
by
Doogle
((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: Doogle; rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...
3
posted on
09/27/2010 6:51:37 AM PDT
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: Doogle
No problem. Just as soon as every email and phone call made by every DemonRAT politician be made available to the public.
4
posted on
09/27/2010 6:54:45 AM PDT
by
bitterohiogunclinger
(Proudly casting a heavy carbon footprint as I clean my guns ---)
To: Doogle
The claim is that this is for “terror suspects” and other crime (like downloading copyrighted material).
Since Obama doesn’t give a Red Rat’s A$$ about jihadists within our US military, you can scratch out that he’s trying to track terrorists.
5
posted on
09/27/2010 6:56:53 AM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(Ask yourself,where does Saudi Arabia fit on a scale of "passive" to "moderate" to "extremist" Islam?)
To: Doogle
Citizens exist for the convenience of the state.
6
posted on
09/27/2010 6:57:07 AM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
("The only stable state is one in which all men are equal before the law." -- Aristotle)
To: ShadowAce
U.S. Wants Broader Internet Wiretap Authority
How long before an encrypted Skype-style client shows up somewhere. Wouldn't be that hard to do.
7
posted on
09/27/2010 6:57:41 AM PDT
by
BikerJoe
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Citizens Subjects exist for the convenience of the state.
8
posted on
09/27/2010 6:59:47 AM PDT
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Control the money supply (banks & what not) - check
Control industry (unions) - check
Snoop on us constantly - check
Keep it up....
9
posted on
09/27/2010 7:02:28 AM PDT
by
LFOD
(Presently - Back in Dixie)
To: Doogle
We all want things we probably shouldn't have. I want an aircraft carrier and my own habitable planet.
Some things just aren't meant to be...
10
posted on
09/27/2010 7:13:00 AM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(III, Alarm and Muster)
To: BikerJoe
To: Doogle
PGP (Pretty Good Privacy). Great stuff.
GPG (GNU Privacy Guard). Totally compatible w/PGP (same open code.)
Enigmail on Thunderbird.
Might have to lengthen my PGP keys a bit or two. :)
Screw 'em.
12
posted on
09/27/2010 7:16:36 AM PDT
by
dayglored
(Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
To: Paine in the Neck; BikerJoe
>
How long before an encrypted Skype-style client shows up somewhere. How to Encrypt VoIP Skype is already encrypted:
https://support.skype.com/faq/FA145/What-type-of-encryption-is-used
Skype uses AES (Advanced Encryption Standard), also known as Rijndael, which is used by the US Government organizations to protect sensitive, information. Skype uses 256-bit encryption, which has a total of 1.1 x 10^77 possible keys, in order to actively encrypt the data in each Skype call or instant message. Skype uses 1024 bit RSA to negotiate symmetric AES keys. User public keys are certified by the Skype server at login using 1536 or 2048-bit RSA certificates.
13
posted on
09/27/2010 7:22:10 AM PDT
by
dayglored
(Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
To: Paine in the Neck; BikerJoe
>
Skype is already encrypted: ... and if you don't trust that, use PGP/GPG on your confidential instant message text or file transmissions.
That's what I do.... it's easy and works like a champ.
14
posted on
09/27/2010 7:25:06 AM PDT
by
dayglored
(Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
To: Doogle
Anyone who hasn’t factored this eventuality into the equation is a fool. The time to stock up and form (tracable, monitorable) networks over the net is coming to an end.
I’ve especially been amused by those spinning SHTF schemes based on email and facebook networks and such. Better be ready to go low tech when that happens, and prepare for it now.
dagogo redux.com (predominantly White)
15
posted on
09/27/2010 8:16:01 AM PDT
by
dagogo redux
(A whiff of primitive spirits in the air, harbingers of an impending descent into the feral.)
To: dayglored
Just so people know: 256-bit AES is rated by the government for carrying top-secret communications.
But if Skype gives the government your private key, all is lost.
It is possible to have your own AES encryption on top of theirs, by encrypting a text file and then sending it via Skype. Not as convenient, but nearly bulletproof if you choose a pretty random key.
16
posted on
09/27/2010 8:18:45 AM PDT
by
backwoods-engineer
(There is no "common good" which minimizes or sacrifices the individual. --Walter Scott Hudson)
To: Doogle
The distance between what is being said, and what is meant is the Grand Canyon: “terrorist” simply means those who have the temerity to disagree with the government. You know. Citizens.
17
posted on
09/27/2010 8:20:22 AM PDT
by
sayuncledave
(A cruce salus)
To: backwoods-engineer
>
But if Skype gives the government your private key, all is lost. Well, Skype could give the government the temporary private key they generated and assigned to me for a given conversation. But that's not "my private key" in the same sense as my PGP key or SSh key is "my private key".
> It is possible to have your own AES encryption on top of theirs, by encrypting a text file and then sending it via Skype. Not as convenient, but nearly bulletproof if you choose a pretty random key.
Precisely, which is why I use PGP, SSh, or similar for guaranteed privacy when needed. Mostly that's for business data. But the same principle applies to anything I want to keep private.
It's cat-and-mouse -- each step the government takes to deny privacy will be met with another step from private individuals to ensure it. They can't throw everybody in jail at once.
I think...
18
posted on
09/27/2010 8:24:37 AM PDT
by
dayglored
(Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Citizens exist for the convenience of the state. <shudder>
19
posted on
09/27/2010 8:50:10 AM PDT
by
zeugma
(Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam)
To: dayglored
Enigmail on Thunderbird. Yup. Totally slick.
My keys are already big enough to survive the heat death of the universe.
20
posted on
09/27/2010 8:51:52 AM PDT
by
zeugma
(Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson