Yes, it is true. Posted on 09/23/2010 1:29:27 PM PDT by unspun
Yes, it is true.
You may read this September, 2010 report, courtesy of our Freedom of Information Act, at cia.gov.
Since the bulk of what this report discusses apparently has to do with international cooperation, why then, did they not choose that apparently appropriate phrase, instead of "Global Governance"?
"Global Governance" - in case you need to recheck your eyes and mind.
Here is an interesting and self-conflicted disclaimer, from its "Introduction," page 1:
The term “global governance” as used in this paper includes all the institutions, regimes, processes, partnerships, and networks that contribute to collective action and problem solving at the international level. This definition subsumes formal and informal arrangements as well as the role of nonstate actors in transnational settings. Regional cooperation may also be regarded as an element of global governance insofar as it contributes to broader efforts. Governance differs from government, which implies sovereign prerogatives and hierarchical authority. Global governance does not equate to world government, which would be virtually impossible for the foreseeable future, if ever.Are you saying, under your breath, "'Governance differs from government.... Global governance does not equate to world government....' Who are they trying to kid?"
How can any set of people practice governance when there is no effort of government in effect? Clearly, they wish to establish dependable, and enforceable arrangements, coordinated and administered between nations, hence their admission to the word "governance," even though they create the distinction without a difference, between that word and "government."
It is a natural and logical fact that if "global governance" is coordinated effectively, it must be done through an coordinating entity of some kind. But, we must not call that body any kind of "government" -- is what they are saying.
And what is any difference again between the nouns-turned-adjectives, used in these terms? How exactly does "globe" differ from "world," o United States’ National Intelligence Council (NIC) and European Union’s Institute for Security Studies (EUISS)? What color is the sky in your world, er, globe?
So, reader, is there a beacon flashing in your mind, "Orwellian. Orwellian. Orwellian...?" The term "global governance" may also be though of as an Hegelian (and Marxist) compromise, between thesis: international cooperation and antithesis: world government. For those that would like a summary of Hegelian philosophy and it's implications for Karl Marx, it is a way of establishing revolution, plus a way of observing reality, then arguing impossibility, and then influencing people to believe they can "progress" by a gradual step toward the unreal and impossible.
A bias for "world government" is apparent in this conflicted pseudodisclaimer, or they would not have admitted (as if forlornly kicking the dust with one shoe, hands in pockets) that "world government... would be virtually impossible for the foreseeable future, if ever."
Your Sovereign expenditure of tax dollars at work, Sovereign Americans.
Exactly what entities orchestrated this? Only the present US administration and that of the EU (which, by the way, are called "governments")? The major CFR, Bilder, Trilateralist, mega-financier, Marxist, fascist, and globalist movers and shakers down? All, likely, of the above? (Much of that list is redundant.) Any others?
And, if this is what is published, what associated intentions, plans, and implications are they holding back, as objectives for their (our) 2025 benchmark/deadline?
More to be published about this -- including more excerpts -- added to this Gulag Bound article, after further research.
h/t @PatriotWatchdog
>>the onset of global governance.
I wonder what popped this phrase into my mind on that thread.......
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2590064/posts
They feel the time is ripe.
1. Our Messiah, Barack Obama can’t hold his own
administration together.
2. I’ll believe the Global Plan is upon us when all the murderous, self-seeking, dictatorial, power hungry, ego maniac, etc. and etc. “leaders” end their UN meeting by standing in a circle, joining hands and singing Cum By Ya together. “After you, no, by all means, you go first....”
In your dreams.
I’m betting you were ignored, ridiculed, asked about your tinfoil hats, told that could never happen, etc, etc.
Back then we didn’t have an illegal alien problem either and you virtually got the crap kicked out of you for bringing it up.
Marked to feed back to you at a later date.
LLS
U.N. Agenda 21 - Sustainable Development through reduction of the world population by 80-90%.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJp0P6eggXU&feature=player_embedded
But how is the UN going to reduce the population and how does the UN intend to feed the masses?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVpN312hYgU
What is the secret?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYWzFBw1pcc
Agenda 21
The New World Order program for the 21st century is called the “Agenda 21”. It is described as the most radical transformation the world has seen. It is sustainable (Communist), inclusive, consensus-based (anti-democratic), will redistribute wealth globally (CO2 taxes, since it connects environment and economy), partnership, banishes large areas from human activity, lumps us together in small areas along motorways and railways in skyscrapers in order to monitor people, kidnaps a generation of children to indoctrinate them into the sustainability religion (environmental Communism). Every country is to be disarmed and there will be a standing UN army to crush rebellions, a global central bank and a one world currency. Democracy and freedom already belong to the past. The illuminist, CFR member George Soros, now demands UN world government after Communist Chinese model.
Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations System, Governments, and Major Groups in every area in which human impacts on the environment take place.
The agenda 21 is clearly aiming at enslaving mankind, concentrating them on small areas and and taking away the reward of the diligent and wise to give it to the bankers - and a little bit to the unwise and lazy. They will rule by “consensus” and disarm all coutries and leave it to a world army to rule the world along communist principles.
The problem they want to solve is rich, free Americans.
There have been hundreds if not thousands of pieces of laws passed over the years that when combined together will turn over our sovereignty to the UN. Just look at the globalists in Obastard’s White House! There are dozens of them in top positions.
God help us if our next president is not a conservative who is dedicated to rooting out all these globalist laws and regulations and people and getting rid of them.
Did you hear Obama say today that he thinks borders should be blurred?
I did.
Interesting, and thanks for sharing.
Unfortunately, too many on FR dismiss many of the warnings and activities of those who push One World Government. Too many in the GOP work with Dems to push the Globalist agenda....whether it is Free Trade, World Trade Org., NAFTA, UN, and other Globalist entities.
Too many complain about statism in America, yet have no problem with supporting Statism from Globalist groups.
This One Worlder nonsense is not a conspiracy theory...it is actual reality
President Palin will terminate this globalism movement and hopefully kick the UN out of this country.
Palin supports the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST)...which surrenders US soverignity. She also supported John McCain in the AZ primary. Doubt she will end Globalism when she supports it with her actions.
Chances are better with Michelle Bachmann ending this Globalist nonsense.
Only takes one good looking eloquent politician to promise, promise, promise nothing and get elected to the New World Order government when the world’s economy is in shambles, people are hungry, homeless and hopeless. We’ve seen it happen when things weren’t even bad yet.
I’m not sure how there will be global governance in 2025 when everyone knows that civilization as we know it will end in 2012. The Mayans had it all figured out. Now if they could only get the Chinese to synchronize their chronology so the Vimanas will know when to land.
>The Mayans had it all figured out
Nah, they just ran outta large rocks.
black helo nutjobs and tin foil hatters were the NAMES we were called...
Governance = Dictatorship .... always. Fight this takeover.
“Palin supports the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST)...which surrenders US soverignity.”
Proof please!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.