Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(NEW) Rove on FoxNews absolutely railing on Christine O'Donnell rigth now

Posted on 09/22/2010 6:18:36 PM PDT by Scythian

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-263 next last
To: netmilsmom
Is he on Hannity? Then why does Sean have him on?

He's a rotating guest on Fox News shows. We cancelled our satellite programming because their leftist analyst/commentators, RINOs and repetitious commercials reached the point of being repugnant to us.

221 posted on 09/22/2010 8:19:21 PM PDT by MamaDearest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: DemonDeac

Not quite. Everyone is standing around patting themselves on the back, not even preparing for the Dum onslaught coming the week BEFORE the election. They are going to bombard Cali, Ill, NV etc etc. I am worried about this developement.

The idiot class is easily swayed in the last week or so the dums are hoping will happen.

Frankly, the people that NEED our attention are the ones with close races. While everyone is chattering about CO, as if there is a choice in the race, it keeps the focus OFF Coons an avowed Marxist.


222 posted on 09/22/2010 8:21:21 PM PDT by Marty62 (marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: who knows what evil?
Perhaps it should be changed to "Karl Rove Tries to BS His Way Back Into the Good Graces of Tea Party Conservatives"...that would be reasonably accurate. :-)

Now that I agree with. :-D

223 posted on 09/22/2010 8:21:37 PM PDT by Soul Seeker (“I was there when we had the numbers, but didn’t have the principles.”---Jim DeMint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: mwl8787
I am in Delaware and have lived here most of 50 years. If Castle runs as a write-in, he hurts Coons and helps O’Donnell. Trust me.

Very good to know. Thanks! I hope he does. Go Christine!

224 posted on 09/22/2010 8:24:23 PM PDT by RedMDer (Throw Them Out! Forward With Confidence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: donaldo
“I certainly didn’t like Rove’s comments but it’s simply delusional to paint him as anything but a true blue conservative. Ditto, Charles Krauthammer. They’ve both established their bona fides.”

Krathammer is a neocon, not a conservative - very liberal on social issues.

Rove was one of the advisers pushing Bush 43 to the left. Karl Rove believes is whatever is best for Karl Rove.

225 posted on 09/22/2010 8:28:25 PM PDT by bwc2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Marty62

Look at this sleeper race in the MD-4th

Current US Congresswoman:
Donna F. Edwards (D)

Active Candidates:
Robert Broadus (R)
http://www.justiceandliberty.us/

Maybe we can pick this one up. Looks like a great candidate.


226 posted on 09/22/2010 8:31:06 PM PDT by RedMDer (Throw Them Out! Forward With Confidence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: Outlaw Woman
I started reading this long thread and had to start typing before I got too far.

I'm reading a lot of comments from freepers who feel that Rove was "conciliatory" tonight, that he was "backtracking" and actually "complimenting" her. I don't have time to ping to my comment all these folks who think this.

Rove is using a standard propaganda trick....a field in which he's well-versed. To not get into convoluted detail and to describe Rove's MO in plain language.....he's basically praising her with faint damns and then damning her with faint praises in the overly-generous time slots Fox producers are allocating to him on every one of its pundit shows every night.

Rove is accepting every one of these gigs....it's almost as if he's possessed. Is he even sleeping?

Notice what happened tonight after he began his diatribe by being so "conciliatory", soothing and olive-branch-ist. He was putting people off guard. THEN he started to wind up. The anti-O'Donnell words started spilling out of his mouth a mile-a-minute. He didn't blink, change expression, look left or right and he hardly came up for air.

As the words spewed faster and faster, Hannity let him run on. But Karl then started into a sentence or two that was starting on a path of being a little personal about Christine. Hannity quickly cut him off at the pass. But the damage of his long, almost manic soliloquy was done.

Please watch a video with a new eye if you can, keeping in mind my analysis. You'll see what I mean.

The way the Fox producers are rotating the same faces (Rove, Perino, Morris, etal) over and over between the three nightly talk shows is telling. I'm of an almost certainty that it's the producers that are instructing these pundits what show they will be on every night....and Hannity is stuck with Karl's rotation every second night or so because that's what the producers want.

Here's an interesting paragraph from the NYSlimes that sheds some light, perhaps, on Fox's role in the taking-down of Christine O'Donnell....

"The second-largest stockholder in News Corp. - which owns Fox News, the Wall Street Journal and the New York Post - is Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talall.

"The prince, nephew of Saudi King Abdullah, owns $2.3 BILLION of News Corp. stock.

"In the past, he's donated $300,000 to projects led by Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf who wants to build an Islamic community center near Ground Zero".

To me, it looks like while Fox apparently leans conservative, it's not OUR kind of conservative, but "elite conservative" aka ruling class conservative....the conservatism of Rove, Krauthammer, Kristol, McCain and others.

Christine is evidently perceived by the elites as one who will not play ball with elite Arabs or elite Australian publishers or elite Long Island ex-school teachers....she's been been tapped by them as one of us dangerous, bitter-clinger, hick, no-brain constitutionalists.

The continued, unrelenting attacks on Ms. O'Donnell is indicative of the current elite strategery....and folks, just because it's Fox doesn't mean that the network's wealthy owners and high mucky-muck board members don't have agendas.

It's appearing more every hour that Rove is just the vicious little point-man for Fox management's concentrated assault on a woman possibly holding the key to a majority 51st vote.

Watch these not-too-subtle tactics get overt in the next couple weeks before election. You think things are dirty now??????

Leni

227 posted on 09/22/2010 8:34:14 PM PDT by MinuteGal (Are any Americans better off than they were 4 trillion dollars ago?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Scythian
Here's a video (scroll below text and click on video).

So, where's your video to back up your assertion Rove was absolutely railing?

228 posted on 09/22/2010 8:38:11 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bwc2221

Rove is paid to give his honest opinion .....he did that, he has said the candidate is weak and will have to work very hard to win .This is called being an analyst. Rove has done it a long time . Is he wrong sometimes absolutely .....but would you prefer that he lie and tell you O’Donell will sail through because then you will be happy ?

This is a lot like a movie critic ....Many movies are trashed by critics then go on to become huge successes. Hating the critic might feel good but its a waste of time . They do what they are supposed to do.... give you their opinion.

I think Rove has helped this candidate immensely by telling her to open up answer the questions and move on.


229 posted on 09/22/2010 8:48:45 PM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: who knows what evil?

“Perhaps it should be changed to “Karl Rove Tries to BS His Way Back Into the Good Graces of Tea Party Conservatives”...that would be reasonably accurate. :-) “

Agreed. Interestingly, my husband and I simultaneously gave him a one finger salute at some point during Hanity’s show. What comes to my mind- back handed compliments. Neither my husband or I thought it was complimentary. I got the sense of- she’s a nitwit, but at least she hired some good people. His sour grapes over his guy Castle losing is still showing.


230 posted on 09/22/2010 8:49:40 PM PDT by pops88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: Scythian

We need to stop talking incessantly about O’Donnell. The national media is trying to make her the face of the Republican party. We need to raise the profile of some of the other important candidates like Rubio, McMahon, DioGuardi, Toomey, Johnson, Raese, etc.

As she herself acknowledged, she needs to stop doing national interviews and start criss-crossing Delaware for the next 6 weeks.


231 posted on 09/22/2010 9:09:56 PM PDT by nbenyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cammie
"Whatever he said, probably no worse than she deserves. She’s a nut and the seat is going to remain Democrat because she’s a nut."

Oh yes, the Senate is just a fount full sanity.
I bet it would even fill a thimble.
O'Donnell will bring a lot more common sense and honesty to the Senate than what the country has seen displayed in the past by the power grasping establishment political animals that now infest that place. Whether she will win the election is another question entirely. But feel free to place your trust with likes of McCain, Snowe and Castle.

232 posted on 09/22/2010 9:11:20 PM PDT by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal

Wow. That thread went crazy. When I left it, it was up to about 93. Anyway, I’ll try to find it on Youtube; because apparently something was missed in translation regarding this appearance.

I’ve never liked Rove, never have trusted him and don’t doubt that everything you say is true. He is part of the problem and in large part, responsible for the marxist election. We are in trouble, not only because of who is in office but because of those, supposedly on the ‘right’ side, selling us down the tubes for years.


233 posted on 09/22/2010 9:17:02 PM PDT by Outlaw Woman (Extremism in defense of Liberty is sometimes necessary...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: samantha

I didn’t watch....I trusted that the poster who started the thread knew what he as talking about....also, its believable about Rove...


234 posted on 09/22/2010 9:31:03 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: cherry
The original poster was obviously watching a different Show than most of us.

I think everyone needs to judge for themselves, but if you get the transcript or watch the interview on re-run or tape, you will not see him slamming COD, it was mostly positive and upbeat. Tone of voice was fine,inflection was appropriate,body language looked positive to me also. He was the opposite of the dreadful,creepy,nasty unhinged Karl of last week.

235 posted on 09/22/2010 10:38:40 PM PDT by samantha (The New Media fighting the DBM for our Sanity, Survival ,Soldiers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: pops88
Agreed. Interestingly, my husband and I simultaneously gave him a one finger salute at some point during Hanity’s show. What comes to my mind- back handed compliments. Neither my husband or I thought it was complimentary. I got the sense of- she’s a nitwit, but at least she hired some good people. His sour grapes over his guy Castle losing is still showing.

Christine was nominated by the people of Delaware. If little crybaby Karl doesn't like it because his good 'ol boy Castle got smoked; too bad. He should have pitched his fit at home; NOT on a national television program. He should have attacked Coons, not Christine. Any complimentary talk now rings hollow.

236 posted on 09/23/2010 2:47:40 AM PDT by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: Samizdat

I understand that Rove tried to broker a deal between Castle and the Tea Party. The Tea Party declined, got behind O’Donnell and she pulled off the upset.

It isn’t his finances that were hurt, but his ego.


237 posted on 09/23/2010 2:59:19 AM PDT by Nickname
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: samantha
"I think everyone needs to judge for themselves,
but if you get the transcript or watch the interview
on re-run or tape, you will not see him slamming COD,
it was mostly positive and upbeat.
Tone of voice was fine,inflection was appropriate,
body language looked positive to me also.
He was the opposite of the dreadful,
creepy,nasty unhinged Karl of last week.
"

Ahhhh, he is a shapeshifter, just like the Backstabbing Bastard
Romney whom the deceitful Rove serves.

The two of them gave America Obama by throwing the last Election.
How is that working out for you?

238 posted on 09/23/2010 4:04:50 AM PDT by Diogenesis ('Freedom is the right of all sentient beings.' - Optimus Prime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: samantha; Scythian; JulieRNR21; hole_n_one; Heart of Georgia; woofie

i see the original poster never came back to this thread to defend it, after it was exposed as inflammatory and totally inaccurate. his lack of credibility is duly noted.


239 posted on 09/23/2010 7:19:51 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy

Not that big a deal in this case, Rove needs to go and conservatives know it, that week of infamy and attack revealed such anti-conservative passion and devotion in Karl Rove that we now know that he will work to deliver an actual GOP Senate seat to the Democrats to take out the conservative grass roots.

Rove is traitorous, anti-conservative scum that needs to be removed as a public face and voice of the GOP.


240 posted on 09/23/2010 7:30:56 AM PDT by ansel12 ([fear of Islam.] Once you are paralyzed by fear of Mohammedanism...you have lost the battle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-263 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson