Posted on 09/21/2010 11:32:37 AM PDT by chatter4
Video showing the actual Certificates of Nomination issued by the DNC and the Democratic Party of Hawaii. Explains why Nancy Pelosi lied...
I see it is William H. Gilardy Jr. representing Stanly Ann Soetoro in the Divorce Documents. Its printed on the Divorce Document.
Now, for the Hawaii Certification... Is it the same William H. Gilardy Jr. ? How do we know?
Very difficult to explain this away.
It looks like the same lawyer for the divorce. Hats off to Butter, I think she uncovered a rock with a snakes under it.
this is the paper trail to the lies and fraud...
this is the paper trail to the lies and fraud...
this is the paper trail to the lies and fraud...
Thanks chatter4 for posting this thread.
They’ll be here soon.
They are getting orders from the Con Men at the Islamic Cesspool, AKA The White House.
Actually I think they have been told to let this thread die as part of their marching orders.
What is new to me is the HI 2008 election form as differing from the previous two election cycles for president! The democrat party is now the authority of whom is eligible, not the Constitution!
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Seems to me that William H. Gilard Jr. didn't want to lose his license.
Is there anything being argued here that hasn't been repeated and responded to already?
You comment could be said of **every** Obama eligibility thread, yet, within **SECONDS** there are swarms of afterbirthers more than ready to defend the “Won”. They are like the attack of the killer bees!
So?...Here it is post #71 and where are the afterbirthers?
It has me baffled.
Bttt
I guess there is nothing to Argue.
Hawaii declined to look up his records and qualify him. They had a lawyer that knew the answer. He’s not qualified.
I found several errors in the video. The most obvious of which is the claim (at 2:29) that "Tim Allen was an election official in Honolulu during the campaign period," when we know for a fact he was promoting his latest film, Wild Hogs, at the time.
b4L.
BTT
“How could they deny us??? ...”
You can argue we haven’t standing. You see We the People have sold the country, literally, to the Ruling Class elite.
In the USA, the income tax is a “progressive tax” ; in the setting of taxes, “progressive taxation” means the rich pay more. In the USA, LOTS more.
http://www.taxfoundation.org/news/show/22652.html
Basically the top one percent of income earners in the USA pay 40% of the income tax, the top 5% pay 60%, the top 10% pays 70%.
The top 10% of wage earners....basically those whose children attend the Ivy League, have managed, through several generations of progressive taxation, to “buy” the country. The rich, people who have money to buy almost anything they want, can only buy a country through progressive taxation. That is why they are for it.
Arguably, only those in that class may have “standing” to question the credentials of the Ruling Class’ chosen leader for the 2008 election cycle. But its pretty clear at this point, We the People do NOT have standing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.