Posted on 09/20/2010 6:45:30 AM PDT by kristinn
At the House Energy and Commerce Health Subcommittee hearing last Thursday, Democrats passed a bill to require federal health officials to question anyone seeking services from Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) community health centers or other programs about their sexual orientation and “gender identity.”
Introduced by Rep. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), H.R. 6109 requires HHS to obtain, retain and analyze sexual identity information from patients who seek healthcare, including children.
“This bill is about collecting data, no more, no less,” Baldwin said.
According to Baldwin, the current “lack of cultural competency” among federal officials means that “we are left with gaping holes in our knowledge on LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered) policy” resulting in “significant health disparities.”
Baldwin is the first openly-declared lesbian elected to Congress.
The new bill’s requirements would apply to all HHS health service programs, requiring the health service employees to ask everyone receiving services their sexual orientation and gender identity -- including those that focus on children at school-based health centers. Children who seek help at government-funded school health clinics would be asked whether or not they are gay, lesbian, bisexual or if they know their gender identity.
(Excerpt) Read more at humanevents.com ...
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.
New Dem Motto:
We Molest the Nation's Children on the Backs of Taxpayers!
Just when you think it can't possibly get any worse, it gets worse. If the fiends didn't have money, they couldn't do this crap. TOSS THEM OUT OF OFFICE!
We have to start somewhere and fiscal issues are the first key to gaining control
This is what happens when homosexuals are elected. Stupid voters get what they deserve.
A homosexual is one who commits homosexual acts. Key word = SEXUAL. It then follows that these Administrators are sponsoring sex acts.
According to Baldwin, the current “lack of cultural competency” among federal officials means that “we are left with gaping holes in our knowledge on LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered) policy” resulting in “significant health disparities.”
Once you realize the truth that they are behaviours you can discuss causes and whether these are proper behaviours which the libs do not want us to discuss.
Do you think it's OK to have "Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) community health centers" as long as they are exclusively staffed by those who share your own values?
Nope, but see, this brings up another point, which is the pure idiocy of trying to separate out "fiscal" and "social" issues, as if they were two mutually-exclusive sets of issues. I can just as easily ask a lot of social liberaltarians if they are willing to keep the DHHS, so long as it reflects their social values - and the answer from many of them would be (and in fact, HAS been) "Yes."
I've known libertarians who want to eliminate the federal Dept. of Education, but who then say they'd be entirely cool with allowing homosexual indoctrination in schools, once they're devolved to the states. That's just as bad as the federal DHHS doing it, and shows that they just don't "get it."
Conservatives need to work hand in glove to advance ALL of conservatism - not just one preferred little corner of it that they try to carve out as "theirs." Someone who is not willing to work just as hard for social conservatism, when one or more of those is the issue of the day, asthey are for fiscal conservatism cannot really be called a "conservative" and does not really have any place in the conservative movement, except as an opportunistic scavenger.
The Democrats envision a sex-positive socialist paradise in which children as young as 5 are getting it on with other children and adults.
When the majority fail to participate the experiment will fail.
said this before and I will say it again including to the teacher who was on here saying how she talked about homosexuality in her classroom and that is OK.
This kind of crap should not be in the classroom, it is not their business but that person’s and certainly I would hope the parents with some decent teachers speak up and take a stand.
The power of the school is from parents who stand together.
I’ve already talk to my kids teachers, told them that they had better not talk about this and I don’t want any books with it in either.
Every teacher I have spoken too agrees, though this is a more republican county.
The new principle tried to put on the obama speech in the school.
Trust me I got others too to call her and tell her we do nto want this and let her be on notice.
She the new principle was at first shocked I think , but even more so when she found that the teachers refused to put the speech on even though she got on the school speakers telling them to turn it on..
If this new principle thinks she is coming in here with a liberal agenda then she had better keep her bags packed as she won’t be around here for long
I found that really amusing and scary at the same time.
Democrats: The Child Molesting Party.””
This is the goal of nearly every male homo out there. Molesting young boys is a big part of the lifestyle and they will not be satisfied until they have full access to kids; either they will be able to molest them thru membership in child organizations or they will own them through the “adoption” process.
I don’t see what the educational/health application of this information is.
Something smells fishy here.
Children who seek help at government-funded school health clinics would be asked whether or not they are gay, lesbian, bisexual or if they know their gender identity.
**********************
Agreed.
In fact, bears repeating:
Nope, but see, this brings up another point, which is the pure idiocy of trying to separate out "fiscal" and "social" issues, as if they were two mutually-exclusive sets of issues. I can just as easily ask a lot of social liberaltarians if they are willing to keep the DHHS, so long as it reflects their social values - and the answer from many of them would be (and in fact, HAS been) "Yes."
I've known libertarians who want to eliminate the federal Dept. of Education, but who then say they'd be entirely cool with allowing homosexual indoctrination in schools, once they're devolved to the states. That's just as bad as the federal DHHS doing it, and shows that they just don't "get it."
Conservatives need to work hand in glove to advance ALL of conservatism - not just one preferred little corner of it that they try to carve out as "theirs." Someone who is not willing to work just as hard for social conservatism, when one or more of those is the issue of the day, as they are for fiscal conservatism cannot really be called a "conservative" and does not really have any place in the conservative movement, except as an opportunistic scavenger.
You expect 6 year old children to refuse to go along with the program and become rebels?
This is insanity.
Throwing children into the gaping maw of public school is to open them to indoctrination of the worst kind.
Little children need their innocence unperverted, you can’t expect little children to know right from wrong in the face of horrible onslaughts like this, or to be able to stand up to authorities.
Children should respect their teachers; that’s why they should only have teachers that are worthy of respect.
It’s the adults’ job to fight this insanity, not little childrens’ job.
Good for you. It is the parents’ jobs to protect children from leftist hateful nonsense. Kids cannot.
Excellent points.
>“This bill is about collecting data, no more, no less,” Baldwin said.<
Sure it is, you evil witch.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.