Replies

The difference is that Mexicans are not opposed to Western culture - they are Christians, descendants of the Western Christian culture of Spain, and while you may not like them, they aren’t out to kill us or take us over. The Muslims, on the other hand, would gladly crush every German Christian head into the ground.

And the Muslims here, in places such as Detroit and Minneapolis, will gladly do the same. They’ve already silenced bells in those cities and are broadcasting their Islamic howlings. And, incidentally, probably the majority are legal immigrants, brought in through family reunification, or illegals who overstayed a legal family reunification or student visa. So illegality is not necessarily the defining issue here. What is legal or illegal all depends on US immigration law.

Don’t criticize Merkel unless you intend to do something about our own immigration policy, which is heavily slanted towards Islamic countries (especially after Obama changed it by an administrative act the month after he was inaugurated).

Our immigration policy was designed by the Democrats back in 1965 and they have continued to bring in more “exotic” people all the time. When the Republicans get in, we have to pressure them to cut back on immigration. If the Repubs were smart, they would drive home the point to the nation, that the liberal Democrats with all of their politically correct policies were the ones who brought in millions of Muslims.

The immigration issue has to be brought up for discussion. No matter whether they calls us nativists, bigots, blah blah blah, we have to point out that the Democrat policies are endangering our country. The people will be on our side, everybody is fed up with the Muslims and all of their garbage. Stopping Muslim immigration is a sure fire winner for the Republicans.

Thing to remember here is that when you scratch the surface, hispanic immigration *is* muslim immigration, or at least is trending that way. A long time ago, Mecha met with Arafat to sort of coordinate their "struggles". And the hispanic ideological agenda is now pretty much indistiguishable from the palestinians. What you now have on the border (and the rest of the US) is an intifada, and clearly islamist-inspired. And the hispanic orgs have long formally rejected any integration. Just to give you an idea, from Mecha:

The adoption of the name Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan signaled a new level of political consciousness among student activists. It was the final stage in the transformation of what had been loosely organized, local student groups, into a single structure and a unified student movement.
Adamant rejection of the label "Mexican-American" meant rejection of the assimilation and accommodationist melting pot ideology that had guided earlier generations of activists. Chicanismo involves a crucial distinction in a political consciousness between a Mexican-American (Hispanic) and a Chicana/o mentality. El Plan de Santa Barbara speaks to such issues of identity politics by asserting: "The Mexican-American (Hispanic) is a person who lacks respect for his/her cultural and ethnic heritage.

So the hispanic "reconquista" is just that; invasion. Just as the jihad. And all the while the Catholic bedrock of Mexico is being replaced (and fast) with islam. Back in 2007, Mecha's leader had an Arabic name, Omar Medina.

What a crock!

Tell that to La Raza and the many 'hispanic' organizations that sued to have govt. documents in spanish.