Would be very helpful to know the honest reason.
1 posted on
09/18/2010 3:06:33 PM PDT by
STARWISE
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
To: STARWISE
I think that Rove’s flip out was his “Howard Dean” moment. I suspect he will relegated to the party's scrap heap, as Dean was.
To: STARWISE
IMHO..Rove was actually trying to build his credentials as the one who could broker Tea Party deals. He doesnt understand the Tea Party has no leaders authorized to do such deals. Hes pissed because hes out of the power broker loop as We the People are starting to take responsibility for vetting candidates directly. Wait til all of DC figures out that with modern communications and alternative media...theres no need for power brokers or lobbyists.
163 posted on
09/19/2010 5:44:54 AM PDT by
mo
To: cajungirl
Why is Rove out slanderously attacking the party nominated candidate for Senate in Delaware. Why, if the Delaware race is so vital to the party, is Rove doing everything he can to insure we lose the race?
168 posted on
09/19/2010 5:59:45 AM PDT by
MNJohnnie
(The problem with Socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money. Lady Thatcher)
To: Conservativegreatgrandma; cajungirl
Rather then defending Rove out of a misplaced habit of loyalty to the GOP party leadership, think about it and address the question.
Why is Rove still out there trashing our own candidate each and every day if this race is so very vital to the GOP?
170 posted on
09/19/2010 6:04:42 AM PDT by
MNJohnnie
(The problem with Socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money. Lady Thatcher)
To: STARWISE
Yes and this has been to the detriment of this nation. Conservatives have held their nose to put people in office just because they had an (R) after their name.
Times are a changing. I am so glad that these people like Rove are being exposed for who they truly are. They truly are the “establishment” and we need to get rid of all of them.
Our nation is on the line.
173 posted on
09/19/2010 6:08:54 AM PDT by
truthandlife
("Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Ps 20:7))
To: STARWISE
I would say it but then I would be just like Tokyo. Let your imagination run wild as to the real reason!!!
184 posted on
09/19/2010 7:20:37 AM PDT by
mad_as_he$$
(Playing by the rules only works if both sides do it!)
To: STARWISE
No, the real reason is that Chris O'Donnell is a failed "political activist" who sued when she couldn't cut the mustard and is qualified to run nothing more than her own checking account, and we have reason to be suspicious of even that.
Karl may have his own faults ("amnesty" for votes/"family values don't end at the Rio Grande"), but he is keenly perceptive as to how to win elections state by state. Nevertheless, even Joe and Jane Average could look at Chris O'Donnell's history and come to the conclusion that she isn't someone who they would want to elect to their church social committee, let alone the Senate.
185 posted on
09/19/2010 7:26:16 AM PDT by
Clemenza
(Remember our Korean War Veterans)
To: STARWISE
He took the Castle consulting job on a contingency basis.
192 posted on
09/21/2010 4:48:36 PM PDT by
Crawdad
(Obamacare will lead to back-alley physicals.)
To: STARWISE
I believe C. Rove is peddling a book.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson