Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Here's the real reason Karl Rove flipped out on Christine O'Donnell
Business Insider ^ | 9-17-10 | Joe Weisenthal

Posted on 09/18/2010 3:06:26 PM PDT by STARWISE

The night Christine O'Donnell won the GOP nomination for Senate in Delaware, party stalwart Karl Rove flipped out, and warned that she was a liar, of ill-character, and generally not the kind of person that the party should get behind.

It only took an instant for other party leaders like Rush Limbaugh and Michelle Malkin to flip out right back at him. But why did Rove take this tack? It's not because he's not into right-wingers

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: assassin4romney; christineodonnell; crybabyrove; establishment; guerrillapolitics; karlrove; newbreed; newsheriffintown; palin; rino; rinorove; romney; romneybrownshirt; romneyhenchman; rove; roverino; ryb; sarahpalin; tokyorove
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-203 next last
To: exit82

The only common denominator in this whole mess it seems is Mittens, and men who are hitched to him.

Maybe Rove is syphalitic.


81 posted on 09/18/2010 4:17:37 PM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: AdaGray

Agree. Rove screwed the pooch. In his book he repeatedly tries to take credit for policies (e.g. compassionate conservatism) Dubya adopted. He’s like the rooster who takes credit for the sunrise upon his cock-a-doodle-do. Rove mentions how Laura would hang around when he visited the Governor’s mansion to plot strategery w/ Dubya. I sure she was just keeping an eye on the slimy little bastard.


82 posted on 09/18/2010 4:18:05 PM PDT by shalom aleichem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
Maybe Rove is heavily invested in CCX, and was counting on Castle to vote for cap and tax.

His reaction was very unusual and clearly shows that there is a back story to what is going on. Wish we knew what it really is.

His reaction reminded me of a surprised rat trapped in a corner. It was far from a truly logical and balanced political analysis, which would have included at least a mention of her opponent's baggage(Coons) when assessing her chances.

83 posted on 09/18/2010 4:20:00 PM PDT by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Rove, Crist, Murkowski, and Castle need to start their own party. I’m betting it draws more from the Dems than the GOP.


84 posted on 09/18/2010 4:21:10 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

I see what you mean. That article shows clearly too, just how this is nothing but a ‘game’ to them. Who wins, who is in what position etc. And is precisely why we are in the boat we are in.


85 posted on 09/18/2010 4:22:03 PM PDT by Outlaw Woman (Extremism in defense of Liberty is sometimes necessary...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

“Strategists”, “Handlers”, “Architects”, “Insiders”.... Sarah Palin DESPISES them like a ‘Mama Grizzly’ despises intruders into her den.


86 posted on 09/18/2010 4:22:20 PM PDT by LibFreeUSA (Show me what Obama brought that was new and there you will find things only radical and destructive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

I do agree with that, and I celebrate it! :)


87 posted on 09/18/2010 4:23:18 PM PDT by brytlea (Jesus loves me, this I know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: brytlea
I think it’s just as likely that he really doesn’t think she can win, plain and simple.

Uniting with her would help her win... that's the point. She beat Castle, so obviously she had something going for her in the minds of the voters.

88 posted on 09/18/2010 4:27:38 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

It’s not that. When he said it, She was already the winner. At that point there was no up side of trashing her except to help the libs beat her. He does not care if she loses. He wants her to lose. I can’t figure it out either but its not that he is just smart enough to see she can’t win. He is taking part in her losing. On purpose.


89 posted on 09/18/2010 4:29:43 PM PDT by carjic (Laid off since Dec 08...HELP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cementjungle

I do agree with you. I’m just not sure a lot of people aren’t making more of Rove’s comments than is there. But, I’m subject to being wrong. I have been before and I will be again. And I’m willing to admit that! :)


90 posted on 09/18/2010 4:30:24 PM PDT by brytlea (Jesus loves me, this I know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: ceoinva

>>Guess who is on Fox News Sunday now that O’Donnell has backed out? Yep, “Bush’s Brain”<<

They were going to have both of them on before she opted out. Can you imagine the trap that would have been?


91 posted on 09/18/2010 4:39:55 PM PDT by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: DTogo

You more of a Hillary, Pelosi or Boxer type?


92 posted on 09/18/2010 5:03:43 PM PDT by Minn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ncalburt
Rove should disappear for a long time.

With Sean Hannity around to constantly give him air time, not a chance.

93 posted on 09/18/2010 5:05:40 PM PDT by JohnG45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: meyer

He pushed Bush on us,

~~~~~

What a completely inaccurate and grossly flippant characterization, as if Pres. Bush wasn’t the boss, even as he dealt with the WOT, 24/7, from 9//11 until the last day of his term, and promoted his conservative principles with a Democratic congress.

###

“Indeed, Bush arguably did more to advance conservative priorities than any president that came before him. Consider a few examples:

TAX CUTS. Bush enacted the largest tax cuts in history — and unlike my personal hero, Ronald Reagan, he never signed a major tax increase into law.

..

JUDGES. Bush has the best record on judges of any Republican president in memory – his appointments of Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito will be judged favorably over time compared to Justices Anthony Kennedy, Sandra Day O’Connor, David Souter and John Paul Stevens (all put on the high court by Republican presidents).

..

FREE TRADE. Bush enacted free-trade agreements with 17 nations, more than any president in history.

..

HEALTH CARE. Bush created Health Savings Accounts – the most important free-market health-care reform in a generation. And he courageously stood up to Congressional Democrats when they sought to use the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) to nationalize health care — and defeated their efforts.

..

SCHOOL CHOICE. Bush won a Supreme Court ruling declaring school vouchers constitutional and enacted the nation’s first school-choice program in the District of Columbia.

..

SANCTITY OF HUMAN LIFE. Bush was the most pro-life president in history, securing passage of the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act, the Unborn Victims of Violence Act and the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act.

And Bush steadfastly refused to fund the destruction of human embryos for research — and was vindicated by the scientific breakthroughs that followed. No president did more to protect the sanctity of unborn life.”

Much more here
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/postpartisan/2010/04/bushs_conservative_legacy.html

~~~~~~~~

Compare those days and relative sanity to what we face now.


94 posted on 09/18/2010 5:07:49 PM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

This wasn’t about numbers


95 posted on 09/18/2010 5:08:01 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (When the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn (Pr.29:2))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: UriÂ’el-2012
We have learned a number of things about Karl Rove.Rove also one of those rude guys who says if you want immigration law enforced you must not like "brown people"
96 posted on 09/18/2010 5:10:03 PM PDT by tommix2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: lonestar
Rove was a diaster for Bush.

He almost lost two elections to weak Democrats, Gore and Kerry.

And he did lose the House in 2006 with his 'compassionate conservatism' nonsense.

The Democrats control all three brances of Government because of his 'skill's'

97 posted on 09/18/2010 5:11:26 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (When the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn (Pr.29:2))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

I’m with you.

Although I’d argue that those old fellows who all looked as if swallowing a sour grape...Krauthammer, Rove..., Castle himself...well dag, how’d you like to have these sourpusses up against the bright and very sincere smile of a Christine O’Donnell?

But I digress.

I think that Rove was somehow, someway, employed by the Castle campaign and THERE is the reason for the sour grapes.

although Rove would not, ahem, never, let his own personal fortune stand in the way of the Republican voters’ wishes or anything.

Seriously, I think Rove had a financial stake in it.

Krauthammer is an old blowhard who, in order specifically to avoid the title of blowhard, came out in 2008 with a bright smile as close as Krauthammer can come to such a thing, and declared that Obama was a very intelligent, charismatic fellow and would make a fine President.

Now that’s it’s only some sweet young thing with a smile that lights up the world elected all fair and square by the Republic ilk who carry their guns and bibles in their pockets....well now, hey, he can act like a real asshole.

Mike Castle, another guy with a smile brings out the sunshine on a cloudy day....well his reasons to bash O’Donnell are somewhat understandable.

Buncha old men pushed aside and they know, THEY KNOW, we’re ALL GONNA BE SORRY.

Bah humbug.


98 posted on 09/18/2010 5:13:39 PM PDT by Fishtalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

You don’t attack the nominee the day she has won and then continue to attack her!


99 posted on 09/18/2010 5:14:19 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (When the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn (Pr.29:2))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: brytlea
Frankly, I don't care why he did anything, but I do know WHAT he did, and it was despicable.

No doubt about that.

100 posted on 09/18/2010 5:16:07 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (When the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn (Pr.29:2))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-203 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson