Posted on 09/16/2010 11:35:14 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner
2008 gave America an incredibly charismatic candidate for President of the United States. Speech after speech showed a candidate with increasing momentum as primary race after primary race concluded. And then came the nomination, more speeches, culminating in an election night victory.
(snip)
But after Obama was sworn in, things began to change? Almost immediately. Obama loved to campaign. He clearly didnt like the work of being President though, and that attitude was felt by the entire White House staff within weeks after the inauguration. Obama the tireless, hard working candidate became a very tepid personality to us. And the few news stories that did come out against him were the only things he seemed to care about. He absolutely obsesses over Fox News. For being so successful, Barack Obama is incredibly thin-skinned. He takes everything very personally.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsflavor.com ...
Being the president is a very hard job with many challenges and difficult decisions. Obama's ego must be bruised and battered with so many talking about him like a dog when actually they're sceptical of his idiotic policies. He's still got the personality and thin skin of a teenager.
He's probably freaking out which might be the reason he's always hiding on the golf course.
I wish I was kidding, or exaggerating, but I am not. The President of the United States threw a temper tantrum
. was told that Obama thinks the banking system is out to get him now. That they and the big industries are making him pay for trying to regulate them more. That is the frame of mind the President is in these days. And you know what? Maybe he is right, who knows?
listening to him without his teleprompter exposes his very limited knowledge base...
he talks in circles.....granted, he throws in the big words and has the air of somebody with intellingense, but it was all a phoney act...
he has no real depth of knowledge or experience or common sense or any sense of the American culture....that's because he didn't grow up here..this is not his fatherland....
he's the biggest puff of smoke and I can't wait til he blows away....
The article misses facts that would be well-known to a real 0bama insider, such as claiming that 0bama never lost an election. He lost a big one. Once.
The article also contradicts itself by claiming that 0bama obsesses over Fox News but watches ESPN religiously. Yeah, I know you can have two TVs on...that’s not the point.
The article is unsourced and fits the “whisper” trick long-used by seasoned Democratic Party professionals to trick unwitting conservatives into repeating blatantly false rumors...thereby discrediting the conservatives.
Be smarter than that. Clinton did that for 8 years.
Greg Craig, Clinton lackey.
First, the article isnt believable.
Second, this is a re-post.
Keep in mind that back when Bill Clinton was President that his Machine would float ridiculously false stories (one was that he practiced voodoo, another that he participated in ritual child sacrifices)...
...the goal was to use the anonymous smears to trick conservatives into repeating them by name...thereby attaching a conservative name to the smear and discrediting conservatives.
Dont be a sucker for such tricks again.
Hey, it’s the “seriousness of the charges” right?
Sure, it may be a planted article but Obama has done more harm to his party that Clinton ever did. I still think Obama's welcome is wearing mighty thin within the Democrat party and will be evn more so after November 2nd.
If you’ll remember, one of the “whisper” tricks used by Clinton’s team back in the day was that Clinton had “thrown a temper tantrum” when he was interviewed by Ken Starr on video.
Then the video was released aafter conservatives had championed that rumor...
...the punchline was that Clinton was calm and cool in the entire interview.
Conservatives had been suckered.
It might be true. It might not be true.
Fake but accurate is the Dan Rather standard of journalism.
I don’t care to play.
It may be a false report but I beleive it points in the direction of the truth.
My post is the same thing I've been saying elsewhere for a while now, based on reports straight out of the pro-O press.
This is the conclusion I've come to, which is that this guy is a puppet president, none too bright, probably on par with Kerry and Gore. The key is, he's a puppet. He doesn't govern. His endless speeches arguing for his agenda don't betray any particular knowledge of the nuts and bolts of the actual legislation, because he didn't write it, didn't read it, and doesn't seem to know much about whats in it.
I don't care if its a re-post, I haven't seen it before. I'll take your warning under advisement. But the article doesn't accuse him of being into voodoo, it mainly repeats stuff we already know from the straight press. So if it turns out to be bogus, its a double game, printing a truth in a bogus story in order to discredit the truth; which, truth is, we've already caught the Obamists doing I believe on other issues. So you could be right. "Fake but accurate".
See post #32.
What I also think I’ve seen are articles planted by the Clintons to see if they can get traction, but without their fingerprints on them. I could be wrong but I believe I’ve seen that several times now. Trying to get information out there, but let conservatives take the hit for it.
In fact, sometimes they’ve used their own people and still blame conservatives for it.
Sure they can! There will come a time, and I think soon, where they cannot let Obama damage the party further. Notice I said the party because I believe THAT is the ONLY thing that matters to the Dems. They could care less what happens to the country.
I think that he’s shown he obsesses over Fox News, it’s personalities and Rush Limbaugh.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.