Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Republicans firm on tax cuts for rich (Again MSM calling $200k "rich")
reuters ^ | 9/14/2010 | By Kim Dixon and Andy Sullivan

Posted on 09/14/2010 4:20:05 AM PDT by tobyhill

Republicans in the U.S. Senate poured cold water on Monday on hopes for a compromise with President Barack Obama that would have allowed Bush-era tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans to expire.

Taxes have become a flashpoint going into a November 2 election in which Republicans are seeking to wrest control of Congress from the president's fellow Democrats. Obama says the cost of keeping the tax cuts for the rich is too high as the United States emerges from recession with a massive budget deficit.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 09/14/2010 4:20:07 AM PDT by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Taxes on the “rich” keep creeping up. Every tax cut is targeted to the middle class and most tax increases are disproportionately targeted at the “rich”. We’re now in a situation where the “rich” (top 5%) pay over half of all income taxes. That’s dangerous when the middle class and poor vote themselves benefits on the backs of the “rich.” Republicans need to do a much better job pointing out that most of the “rich” are small business owners who hire people and rent buildings and are the backbone of the economy. They aren’t Ted Kennedys and John Kerrys sitting around sponging off the wealth someone else built up for them.


2 posted on 09/14/2010 4:32:54 AM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

the cost of keeping the tax cuts for the rich is too high as the United States emerges from recession with a massive budget deficit.

Frankly Scarlett, this doesn’t appear to be emerging from anything. Wouldn’t increases in employment be a leading indicator of emergence?

The question in my mind is this: Isn’t the cost of keeping that, (freedom of speech unavailable for use) in the White House way too costly?


3 posted on 09/14/2010 4:33:53 AM PDT by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

I have to admit, I would be alot more comfortable with $200K coming in


4 posted on 09/14/2010 4:37:28 AM PDT by SF_Redux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Tweaking the tax code is not what we should be doing. We need a wholesale wipeout of the communists entrenched in the government. They are destroying us day by day with no one calling them out.


5 posted on 09/14/2010 4:40:31 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (counter revolutionary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SF_Redux
but $200k is not “rich”, $250k for couples. I don't make either one but I work for a couple that together makes about $300k. If the taxes go up for them then they will pay an additional $10,000 a year in taxes and a round about way take either money or benefits out of my pockets.
6 posted on 09/14/2010 4:45:30 AM PDT by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Just make the tax cuts permanent, dang it!!!


7 posted on 09/14/2010 4:46:20 AM PDT by fwdude (Anita Bryant was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

The Federal Tax receipts were the largest ever in 2007, under the current tax rates.
The deficits are created by SPENDING!
Do we really believe that “rich people” bury their money in the back yard?
They buy goods and services, hire more employees, or invest their hard earned money, making it available for other hard working people to borrow to buy goods and services, expand their business, and hire more employees?


8 posted on 09/14/2010 4:56:20 AM PDT by G Larry (I'd rather see the voters write off Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Well America, Do you want JOBS or Class-warfare?


9 posted on 09/14/2010 5:00:51 AM PDT by Rodm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
You hit the nail on the head. If small business owners (those "wealthy" making 300K/year - BEFORE expenses) get hit with this additional tax, it may mean foregoing an employee or equipment, etc.

Obamster's tax on the wealthy, is actually a tax on employers. IOW, unemployment increases.

10 posted on 09/14/2010 5:03:06 AM PDT by Jane Long (America, while you were sleeping the Socialists took over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard

another word for “the rich” is - “employers”


11 posted on 09/14/2010 5:27:20 AM PDT by silverleaf (Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine

Tweaking the tax code is not what we should be doing. We need a wholesale wipeout of the communists entrenched in the government. They are destroying us day by day with no one calling them out.


That is exactly right.


12 posted on 09/14/2010 5:51:11 AM PDT by ravenwolf (Just a bit of the long list of proofs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

If tax cuts aren’t good for the rich, why are they good for the middle class?

Pray for America


13 posted on 09/14/2010 5:57:27 AM PDT by bray (The Tea Party Manual: http://www.brayincandy.com/id239.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

DH and I barely qualify for the “rich” To earn this distinction, we work 14 hour days, nights, and holidays. Once you reach this benchmark, you get to pay confiscatory taxes, and I suspect our take home is not much different from those making far less than we do.
There is the AMT, deductions roll off and no financial aid for college for you, you are “rich” We paid over 6 figures in state and federal tax last year, and our accountant told us to expect 15K more this year. While I will survive the tax increase, I am cutting back on things like paying someone to clean my house, someone to mow the lawn etc. It will hurt those people far more than it will hurt me. And I can work an additional 2-3 14 hour days per month just to pay uncle sam. Once my kids are out of college, I plan on selling the house and cutting WAY back. I’m tired of the fruit of my labor being taken from me at gunpoint and being given to someone else. /rant off


14 posted on 09/14/2010 6:06:28 AM PDT by Mom MD (Jesus is the Light of the world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
The terminology drives me nuts. An income tax is NOT a tax on wealth, it is a tax on wealth-creation, productivity. If we had actually had a "tax the rich" policy, the Kennedy kids would be delivering pizzas by now.

And Nancy Pelosi would be on the fishing boat with Sarah.

Instead we have a system where guilt-ridden trust-fund babies, who pay very little in taxes, spend their idle time trashing those aspiring to get to higher levels through creativity and hard work.

15 posted on 09/14/2010 9:46:26 AM PDT by cookcounty ("I can see November from my house!" ---Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodm

Star Parker said she was raised to believe that

“You and I are poor because they’re rich”.

The left has done this on purpose. It is evil and destructive,
but it does give them POWER, and that’s all that matters to them.


16 posted on 09/14/2010 9:49:54 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson