Skip to comments.
The Rush Limbaugh LIVE Radio Show Thread - Friday, September 10, 2010
The EIB Network ^
| 09/10/2010
| Rush Limbaugh
Posted on 09/10/2010 8:23:42 AM PDT by IMissPresidentReagan
AND NOW . . . amidst billowing clouds of fragrant, aromatic first- and second-hand premium cigar smoke. . . it is time for . . . that harmless, lovable little fuzz ball, the highly-trained broadcast specialist, having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have, from behind the golden EIB microphone, firmly ensconced in the prestigious Attila-the-Hun chair at the Limbaugh Institute of Advanced Conservative Studies, serving humanity simply by showing up, and hes not retiring until every American agrees with him, do NOT doubt him, with shrieks of joy at the mere mention of his name (thats Rush, for those in Rio Linda),the Mandarin of Talk Radio, with talent on loan from G-d, at the cutting-edge of societal evolution, with half his brain tied behind his back just to make it fair, the all-knowing, all-caring, all-sensing, all-feeling, all-concerned Maha-Rushie! Americas anchorman, truth detector, and doctor of democracy. A Real Man, a living legend, a way of life. Commander in Chief of U.S. Operation Chaos. Chief Waga-Waga El Rushbo of the El Conservo Tribe. Chief of the Patriotism Police. Leader of the Conservative Movement. A Weapon of Mass Instruction. El Rushbo (a little Spanish lingo, there). He is the man who is running America (you know it and I know it). He knows the Democrats like every square inch of his glorious naked body. He is ready to do what he was born to dothats host. Get ready to what you were born to dothats listen (and post your comments on the Rush Limbaugh LIVE Radio Thread).
TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: elrushbo; rushlimbaugh; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 161-179 next last
To: Clint N. Suhks
101
posted on
09/10/2010 10:34:12 AM PDT
by
acsrp38
(Happy Gorbal warming day to you all!! Leave the lights on!!)
To: Clint N. Suhks
102
posted on
09/10/2010 10:34:17 AM PDT
by
mylife
(Opinions $1 Halfbaked 50c)
Shanklin should parody the homeless not getting their one dollar burgers with Cheeseburger in Paradise.
103
posted on
09/10/2010 10:34:17 AM PDT
by
ReneeLynn
(Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it*s the new black. Mmm Mmm Mmm.)
To: mylife
104
posted on
09/10/2010 10:34:46 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Still voteless in NY-29. Over 400 roll call votes missed and counting...)
To: Clint N. Suhks
105
posted on
09/10/2010 10:35:35 AM PDT
by
del4hope
(The Inalienable Rights Movement is here for all Americans)
To: mewzilla
106
posted on
09/10/2010 10:35:49 AM PDT
by
Sensei Ern
(Akbar Zib (Burning the Quran will incite anger? You mean they are using joybuzzers against us now?))
To: del4hope
She is going to Parent’s Weekend, you all should hook up. Not my cup of tea but she’s trying to talk me into it. Won’t happen...
107
posted on
09/10/2010 10:36:00 AM PDT
by
Clint N. Suhks
(0bama, I'll stop calling you a dog when you stop treating us like a fire hydrant (Palin/Cheney 2012)
To: mewzilla
Or THIS:
Jihadists blow up Buddha statue in Afghanistan
MINGORA: Some unidentified militants blew up the historic statue of Buddha in Jihan Abad area of Swat district on Saturday. Talking to The News, Muhammad Aqleem, deputy curator of Swat Museum, said some unidentified militants had exploded the 7th century historic statue of Buddha in Jihan Abad area of district Swat on Saturday night. "This is second attack on the 7th century statue of Buddha. The fresh attack caused irreparable loss to its head and also damaged its shoulders."
The curator maintained that the statue belonged to 7th century A.D, and it was the most complete and inspiring symbol of Gandahara art. After the historic statues of Bamyan in Afghanistan, which were destroyed by the Taliban, the swat statue was the sole example of Buddhist cultural heritage.
"It was seven meters tall and 20 feet high from the land, showing Buddha in the condition of meditation. I don't know what they want to achieve by such actions," he added. Aqleem said he had reported the incident to the local police but he did not think that the police would be able to protect Buddhist cultural sites in swat as they themselves were the victims of terrorist attacks.
Or THIS:
Attacks on the Buddha's statue
Preface to 2001, under the Taliban
In July 1999, Mullah Mohammed Omar issued a decree in favor of the preservation of the Bamyan Buddha's statue. Because Afghanistan's Buddhist population no longer exists, which removed the possibility of the statues being worshiped, he added: "The government considers the Bamyan statues as an example of a potential major source of income for Afghanistan from international visitors. The Taliban states that Bamyan shall not be destroyed but protected."[10]
However, Afghanistan's radical clerics began a campaign to crack down on "un-Islamic" segments of Afghan society. The Taliban soon banned all forms of imagery, music and sports, including television, in accordance with what they considered a strict interpretation of Sharia.[11]
Information and Culture Minister Qadratullah Jamal told Associated Press of a decision by 400 religious clerics from across Afghanistan declaring the Buddhist statues against the tenets of Islam. "They came out with a consensus that the statues were against Islam," said Jamal.
According to UNESCO Director-General Koïchiro Matsuura, a meeting of ambassadors from the 54 member states of the Organisation of the Islamic Conference (OIC) was conducted. All OIC states - including Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, three countries that officially recognised the Taliban government - joined the protest to spare the monuments.[12] A statement issued by the ministry of religious affairs of Taliban regime justified the destruction as being in accordance with Islamic law.[13] Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates later condemned the destruction as "savage".[14] Although India never recognised the Taliban regime in Afghanistan, New Delhi offered to arrange for the transfer of all the artifacts in question to India, "where they would be kept safely and preserved for all mankind.", but these overtures were rejected by the Taliban.
Dynamiting and destruction, March 2001
Site of a statue after it was destroyedThe statues were destroyed by dynamite over several weeks, starting on March 2 [15], carried out in different stages. Initially, the statues were fired at for several days using anti-aircraft guns and artillery. This caused severe damage, but did not obliterate them. Later, the Taliban placed anti-tank mines at the bottom of the niches, so that when fragments of rock broke off from artillery fire, the statues would receive additional destruction from particles that set off the mines. In the end, the Taliban lowered men down the cliff face and placed explosives into holes in the Buddhas.[16]
On 6 March 2001 The Times quoted Mullah Mohammed Omar as stating, "Muslims should be proud of smashing idols. It has given praise to God that we have destroyed them." During a 13 March interview for Japan's Mainichi Shimbun, Afghan Foreign Minister Wakil Ahmad Mutawakel stated that the destruction was anything but a retaliation against the international community for economic sanctions: "We are destroying the statues in accordance with Islamic law and it is purely a religious issue".
On 18 March, The New York Times reported that a Taliban envoy said the Islamic government made its decision in a rage after a foreign delegation offered money to preserve the ancient works. The report also added, however, that other reports "have said the religious leaders were debating the move for months, and ultimately decided that the statues were idolatrous and should be obliterated."[17]
Then Taliban ambassador-at-large, Sayed Rahmatullah Hashemi, said that the destruction of the statues was carried out by the Head Council of Scholars after a single Swedish monuments expert proposed to restore the statues' heads. Hashimi is reported as saying: "When the Afghani head council asked them to provide the money to feed the children instead of fixing the statues, they refused and said, 'No, the money is just for the statues, not for the children'. Herein, they made the decision to destroy the statues". However, he did not comment on the claim that a foreign museum offered to "buy the Buddhist statues, the money from which could have been used to feed children."[18]
108
posted on
09/10/2010 10:36:44 AM PDT
by
Eagle of Liberty
("Stop Spending. Stop Spending. Stop Spending. STOP SPENDING!!!")
To: mewzilla
That is quite a list of losers.
109
posted on
09/10/2010 10:36:57 AM PDT
by
mylife
(Opinions $1 Halfbaked 50c)
To: Clint N. Suhks
Oh, please go. You would enjoy meeting Mr. del and our friends. The kids probably won’t make time for us though, lol.
110
posted on
09/10/2010 10:38:46 AM PDT
by
del4hope
(The Inalienable Rights Movement is here for all Americans)
To: del4hope
Phelps is a Libtard who worked for Owl Bore? In my best "O Brother Where Art Thou" voice,
that makes no sense!Go figure.
111
posted on
09/10/2010 10:40:46 AM PDT
by
Clint N. Suhks
(0bama, I'll stop calling you a dog when you stop treating us like a fire hydrant (Palin/Cheney 2012)
To: Sensei Ern
Finally, footballI was rooting for the Vikes. Geezers rule :)
112
posted on
09/10/2010 10:41:14 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Still voteless in NY-29. Over 400 roll call votes missed and counting...)
To: mylife
I think Jimmy’s spent a bit too much time in Margaritaville :)
113
posted on
09/10/2010 10:41:55 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Still voteless in NY-29. Over 400 roll call votes missed and counting...)
To: Clint N. Suhks
Why does it not make sense? They are a leftist front group, masquerading as a church. I think this Jones guy is the same. Paid stooges and attention whores who are trying to be as outrageous as possible whose goals are twofold. 1) Make Christians look kooky, and 2) Convince the sheeple we need legislation to stifle our first amendment.
114
posted on
09/10/2010 10:43:59 AM PDT
by
del4hope
(The Inalienable Rights Movement is here for all Americans)
To: All
Rush is the best, it is cute how he is talking to this kid!
115
posted on
09/10/2010 10:46:45 AM PDT
by
ColdOne
To: del4hope
Del, that was my first thought, but he is directly offending the annointed one’s religion, so I had second thoughts. I reckon he is a Charismatic because they tend to do things more irrationally. Or, he has another reason for aiming so directly at Islam.
By the way, I was among the first evangelical Christians to identify the One World Church of Revelation to be Islam and not Catholicism.
116
posted on
09/10/2010 10:47:30 AM PDT
by
Sensei Ern
(Akbar Zib (Burning the Quran will incite anger? You mean they are using joybuzzers against us now?))
To: ColdOne
Yes, it’s cute, but enough already . . . (I’m cranky when the football chat gets out of hand).
117
posted on
09/10/2010 10:47:40 AM PDT
by
rightwingintelligentsia
(Forcing one person to pay for the irresponsibility of another is NOT social justice.)
To: del4hope
1) Make Christians look kooky, and 2) Convince the sheeple we need legislation to stifle our first amendment.Well puts 2 and 2 together. Since there are "tea party crashers" who attend the rallies to yell the N-word that makes perfect sense.
118
posted on
09/10/2010 10:49:16 AM PDT
by
Clint N. Suhks
(0bama, I'll stop calling you a dog when you stop treating us like a fire hydrant (Palin/Cheney 2012)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
FYI that was “Fantasy Football” chat.
Shall I explain the difference?
119
posted on
09/10/2010 10:50:44 AM PDT
by
Clint N. Suhks
(0bama, I'll stop calling you a dog when you stop treating us like a fire hydrant (Palin/Cheney 2012)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Yes, its cute, but enough already . . . (Im cranky when the football chat gets out of hand). I agree.
120
posted on
09/10/2010 10:50:52 AM PDT
by
ColdOne
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 161-179 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson