Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama’s New Stimulus Schemes: Same Song, Umpteenth Verse
Cato@Liberty ^ | 9/6/2010 | Daniel J. Mitchell

Posted on 09/06/2010 8:36:41 PM PDT by Qbert

Like a terrible remake of Groundhog Day, the White House has unveiled yet another so-called stimulus scheme. Actually, they have two new proposals to buy votes with our money. One plan is focused on more infrastructure spending, as reported by Politico.

Seeking to bolster the sluggish economy, President Barack Obama is using a Labor Day appearance in Milwaukee to announce he will ask Congress for $50 billion to kick off a new infrastructure plan designed to expand and renew the nation’s roads, railways and runways. …The measures include the “establishment of an Infrastructure Bank to leverage federal dollars and focus on investments of national and regional significance that often fall through the cracks in the current siloed transportation programs,” and “the integration of high-speed rail on an equal footing into the surface transportation program.”

The other plan would make permanent the research and development tax credit. The Washington Post has some of the details.

Under mounting pressure to intensify his focus on the economy ahead of the midterm elections, President Obama will call for a $100 billion business tax credit this week… The business proposal – what one aide called a key part of a limited economic package – would increase and permanently extend research and development tax credits for businesses, rewarding companies that develop new technologies domestically and preserve American jobs. It would be paid for by closing other corporate tax loopholes, said the official, speaking on condition of anonymity because the policy has not yet been unveiled.

These two proposals are in addition to the other stimulus/job-creation/whatever-they’re-calling-them-now proposals that have been adopted in the past 20 months. And Obama’s stimulus schemes were preceded by Bush’s Keynesian fiasco in 2008. And by the time you read this, the Administration may have unveiled a few more plans. But all of these proposals suffer from the same flaw in that they assume growth is sluggish because government is not big enough and not intervening enough. Keynesian politicians don’t realize (or pretend not to realize) that economic growth occurs when there is an increase in national income. Redistribution plans, by contrast, simply change who is spending an existing amount of income. If the crowd in Washington really wants more growth, they should reduce the burden of government, as explained in this video.

  The best that can be said about the new White House proposals is that they’re probably not as poorly designed as previous stimulus schemes. Federal infrastructure spending almost surely fails a cost-benefit test, but even bridges to nowhere carry some traffic. The money would generate more jobs and more output if left in the private sector, so the macroeconomic impact is still negative, but presumably not as negative as bailouts for profligate state and local governments or subsidies to encourage unemployment – which were key parts of previous stimulus proposals.

Likewise, a permanent research and development tax credit is not ideal tax policy, but at least the provision is tied to doing something productive, as opposed to tax breaks and rebates that don’t boost work, saving, and investment. We don’t know, however, what’s behind the curtain. According to the article, the White House will finance this proposal by “closing other corporate tax loopholes.” In theory, that could mean a better tax code. But this Administration has a very confused understanding of tax policy, so it’s quite likely that they will raise taxes in a way that makes the overall tax code even worse. They’ve already done this in previous stimulus plans by increasing the tax bias against American companies competing in world markets, so there’s little reason to be optimistic now. And don’t forget that the President has not changed his mind about imposing higher income tax rates, higher capital gains tax rates, higher death tax rates, and higher dividend tax rates beginning next January.

  All that we can say for sure is that the politicians in Washington are very nervous now that the midterm elections are just two months away. This means their normal tendencies to waste money will morph into a pathological form of profligacy.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dangerousobama; obamacare; obamanomics; recession; shovelreadyjobs; unemployment; unions

1 posted on 09/06/2010 8:36:44 PM PDT by Qbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Qbert

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2584296/posts?page=4

#35!!!


2 posted on 09/06/2010 8:38:58 PM PDT by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

Pert near soon the economy’s goin ta pick up!


3 posted on 09/06/2010 8:41:33 PM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert
Photobucket

4 posted on 09/06/2010 8:50:28 PM PDT by Dick Bachert (The upcoming election is the most important in our lifetimes!!! BE THERE!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

5 posted on 09/06/2010 9:03:17 PM PDT by Hoodat (.For the weapons of our warfare are mighty in God for pulling down strongholds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

The clown is ready for the nut house.


6 posted on 09/06/2010 9:39:28 PM PDT by Big Horn (Rebuild the GOP to a conservative party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Big Horn

I have already emailed my Congressman and Senators and plan on calling them tomorrow Morning!

We need to be heard. We need to blast their server and telephone lines starting tomorrow with NO MORE STIMULUS!!!


7 posted on 09/06/2010 11:02:48 PM PDT by not2worry (WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

Is the “Infrastructure Bank” anything like the ‘Highway Trust Fund’? (Just another pile of money for DC to raid)


8 posted on 09/07/2010 5:55:44 AM PDT by griswold3 ('Regulation and law without enforcement is no law at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

White House proposals is that they’re probably not as poorly designed as previous stimulus schemes.

Not placing any bets on that.


9 posted on 09/07/2010 6:10:22 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson