Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Delaware Republicans Attack Tea Party Senate Candidate As Unelectable ‘Liar’
One News Now ^ | 9/3/2010 | Philip Elliot

Posted on 09/05/2010 5:28:15 AM PDT by IbJensen

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last
To: RaceBannon

Castle voted for Cap & Trade. Who is nuts? Or is he simply a Traitor?


41 posted on 09/05/2010 6:17:40 AM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hal ogen
Do you want to go through this again. No, NE Republicans are not RINOs.

A RINO is someone who is not nor ever was a Republican but who is usually solicited by Republicans to run under their label for the purpose of winning an election ~ and thereby obtaining control of the legislative agenda.

The NE Republicans ~ typified by Richard Milhouse Nixon, Nelson Rockefeller, George Pataki, etc. were always affiliated with Regular Republicans, and Souvrn' Republicans in the Republican caucus.

Getting rid of real RINOs is of value when we have a Republican who can win. Getting rid of NE Republicans simply PO's the NE Republicans who usually vote for them ~ not that it drives them into the arms of the Democrats, but they don't show up to vote.

We've seen this with Conservatives when the NE Republicans, and the Countryclubbers abuse them ~ they just don't vote, and we all lose.

It's not likely a Souvrn' or Regular Republican can be found to run for office in Delaware ~ and win ~ but they have a NE Republican who has demonstrated that he can win statewide elections (several times).

Frankly, I don't support him but Delaware has a demonstrably erratic, bizarre even, electoral track record. They seem not be concerned with the quality of their Senators ~ any "hack" will do as far as they're concerned.

O'Donnell can probably win in Delaware this year, and so can the NE Republican she's running against. If I were a resident and running for Senate, I think I might win ~ THIS YEAR ~ but maybe not some other year.

The electorate is very angry.

The Republican party bosses in Delaware are in error if they imagine that putting either one of these people in the Senate seat will yield any greater advantages to the state ~ neither one will have Senate seniority.

42 posted on 09/05/2010 6:19:05 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: tgusa; saganite
So what you're saying is that you, personally, don't live in Delaware either, and that means you have no more interest in the race yourself than you were granting to saganite?

Regardless, this race is my my business. If Delaware Republicans nominate an unethical nutball who is going to get killed in November, that affects me. If Delaware elects someone who at least votes the right way some of the time versus someone who votes the right way none of the time, that affects me. Delaware's business IS my business, and saganite's too.

43 posted on 09/05/2010 6:21:31 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (The success of Darwinism was accompanied by a decline in scientific integrity. - Dr. Wm R. Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

I don’t know enough about Castle or O’Donnell to have a direct opinion on either. However I would note Delaware overall is not a particularly conservative state. Just because somebody is endorsed by some Tea Party organization doesn’t mean they are electable.

I doubt the lesson of the win in Alaska is applicable in suburban yuppie/old money Delaware. The risk is whether instead the lesson of Nevada is applicable, where unpopular Harry Reid’s best chance of survival is his Tea party endorsed opponent. Maybe the people in Delaware are better positioned to decide that without name calling by us.

Btw, this business of calling everybody a RINO has really been run into the ground. Besides since in fact you are calling for a Third Party, doesn’t this make you the actual Republican in Name Only ?


44 posted on 09/05/2010 6:22:00 AM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tgusa
suggest you stay out of it unless you have a dog in the fight

We all have a dog in every U. S. Senate fight. This is the most nationalized election season in my memory.

(But then, I'm old and my memory ain't what it used to be.)

Also, judging by your posting history, you don't follow your own advice, do you?

45 posted on 09/05/2010 6:22:23 AM PDT by savedbygrace (Rev 22:20 He which testifieth these things saith, Surely I come quickly. Amen. Even so, come, Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Not guilty.


46 posted on 09/05/2010 6:23:18 AM PDT by Poser (Enjoying tasty animals for 58 years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil
Dupont wanted Cap & Trade. ALL Delaware politicians of every stripe ALWAYS vote with Dupont interests, as well as with the gigantic rip-off credit card operations.

Outside of that Delaware's only industry consists of selling cheap fireworks and condoms to homosexuals at the shore.

47 posted on 09/05/2010 6:23:33 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: tlb; IbJensen
Yes, people who continually threaten "third party action" are, in fact, Republicans in Name Only. Still, as long as they don't run for office as Republicans, or try to get involved in state or local Republican party operations, we don't need to worry about that.

But your point is well taken and such people should be warned that the campaign to rid the party of RINOs (where we can) includes eliminating their running dog lackeys!

48 posted on 09/05/2010 6:26:03 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

Hey Race, have you ever been in financial trouble. Also, I’ve seen you at the WH several times wearing a devil mask. You’re crazy!
:-)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2582923/posts


49 posted on 09/05/2010 6:28:40 AM PDT by BufordP (Once a Marine - always a Marine ... Until Jack Murtha.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma
The truth is the "Maine Twin RINOS" do have some value.

Alright, it's time to truly have it out! Any rinos with power are useless. Why don't you people who support rinos understand this after you have witnessed their destruction just like the rest of us for years? The Maine Twins do the republican party absolutely no good if they vote with the dems destructive agenda.

It's so nonsensical to think electing rinos has "Value" when all it does is make it harder for the party to advance it's conservative nature. Here's a novel idea get rid of these prix and start electing people who are conservative...The time is NOW, no more rinos!!

50 posted on 09/05/2010 6:31:36 AM PDT by sirchtruth (Freedom is not free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I don’t give a rats A what DuPont wanted. I simply know that Cap & Trade was a scam and lie from day 1. It is a poison pill that would kill the US. (It’s intent)

Because of bills like the Cap & Trade Bill, this is a national fight not a state issue. I have never been to Deleware and suspect I never will, but we are currently in a war to regain control of the Republican Party and with it the nation.

It is our duty to oust the “enemies of we the people”. We have no choice, it must be done for the nation to survive as a free people. I do not care what Republican POL is damaged because of this. They either get on the train with us, or they will get run over.


51 posted on 09/05/2010 6:32:06 AM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil
If you don't vote in Delaware ........ let me put it this way ........ even on issues with nationwide impact, Delaware voters will vote the way they want to vote.

Maybe you know some other way to do it, but Delaware is Delaware and they have two issues ~ Dupont and Credit Card operations.

Address those issues a way they like and they'll vote for you.

52 posted on 09/05/2010 6:35:50 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: tgusa

“Are you from Delaware?...This is DE’s fight, and suggest you stay out of it unless you have a dog in the fight.”

If it was an election for a DE STATE senator I’d agree with you. But since this person’s actions will affect the NATION then everyone has a dog in this fight. Problem is we can only root for our favorite not bet on it.


53 posted on 09/05/2010 6:41:36 AM PDT by Mac n Jac (www.vetsfightingms.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma

No third party. We take over the GOP.

Thank you for some sanity.

I’ll third that.....time for the conservatives to take control.


54 posted on 09/05/2010 6:47:23 AM PDT by Cathy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: sirchtruth
Why wasn't HCR passed under the "RINO" Republicans? Why in 2001 and 2003 were tax cuts passed instead of a trillion dollar stimulus for teachers and unions?

Simple...more conservative Republicans controlled the agenda.

Control of the House and the Senate are the most important thing for the future of this nation and Republicans have to have seats in liberal states. That means moderate candidates.

The alternative is leaving control in the Dems hands and the continued destruction of our way of life. In case you didn't notice, every RINO defeated in 2006 and 2008 was replaced by a Democrat.

55 posted on 09/05/2010 6:47:40 AM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun
No, it doesn't mean "more moderate" candidates, it simply means more "winning candidates".

The basic rule of party politics is that the majority party organizes the legislative body and sets the legislative agenda.

If you aren't in the majority all you get to do is vote.

Let me organize this like one of those Mazlo Needs charts:

1. Where we can elect a Conservative we must do so.

2. Where we can't, we may have to go with a Republican.

3. Where we have difficulty on even that score, we probably should run a RINO.

4. Where that can't happen, we need to use open primary laws to vote in Democrat primaries for the more conservative candidate.

I don't see where there's any room whatsoever for a "moderate" in that mix.

56 posted on 09/05/2010 6:56:49 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain

Yo Happy Rain—You’ve got it wrong. The RINOs, because they’re owned lock, stock and barrel by the demrats are actually in the majority. Why wouldn’t they be content with their eole as useful idiots to the left?

You don’t seem to understand America has not had a credible opposition party to the Demrats since Reagan. Once you understand, that everything else falls in place.


57 posted on 09/05/2010 6:58:02 AM PDT by dools007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
No, it doesn't mean "more moderate" candidates, it simply means more "winning candidates".

Just semantics. "Winning" unfortunately translates to "moderate" in uber lib country.

I agree with the rest of your post wholeheartedly...

58 posted on 09/05/2010 7:01:43 AM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun

A “winning candidate” is one who wins. It has not been demonstrably the case in recent years that a purely “moderate candidate” can be elected anywhere!


59 posted on 09/05/2010 7:08:33 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Poser

Somebody had to say it!


60 posted on 09/05/2010 7:16:09 AM PDT by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson